• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Australian Encounter - Westall 1966

Free episodes:

I was quite interested in this because it was a case I hadn't heard of. But as I was watching it I was getting more and more skeptical. It has a "made up" feeling to it and I began suspecting that the entire documentary might be a farce like The Secret KGB UFO Files from several years ago. But I looked it up on the net and was finding references to it indicating it was a genuine report.

The details presented in this documentary are quite sensational; hundreds of witnesses, directly overhead, landing, people actually touching it as it was on the ground, government and military operatives running around, etc. At one point something was even said about a girl who got close to it never being seen again. Apparently the military people showed up within 20 minutes.

I don't know, the whole thing seems pretty Tom Clancy to me. I don't actually know one way or the other but my gut feeling is that this case has been dramatically exaggerated over the years and that some of these witnesses are of the me-too crowd.
 
Given the # of witnesses I doubt a hoax. And I doubt it was something prosaic. As for exaggeration, it wasn't so spectacular--the 1994 Zimbabwe case was more so.
 
Australian researcher, Bill Chalker, seems pretty impressed by this case

Two things add to its credibility. First, there have been at least three other reports, from widely separated geographical areas, of UFOs appearing before schoolkids. Second, it coincided, more or less, with at least one other Australian report, involving a "saucer nest" or burned ground from a landing.
 
Given the # of witnesses I doubt a hoax. And I doubt it was something prosaic. As for exaggeration, it wasn't so spectacular--the 1994 Zimbabwe case was more so.

I don't agree with that. The Zimbabwe case doesn't have all the cloak and dagger aspects that this does. It's just a good mass sighting. This yarn has a bunch of paranoid conspiracy elements like missing film, swarms of government agents showing up within 20 minutes, a girl disappearing and never being seen again, sabotaged landing traces, etc. When you add up all the details it's as sensational as a Hollywood script.

That's as far as this documentary goes anyway. I don't know what written reports are like. But it seems to me that over time this case has been corrupted by a heaping helping of bs just like Roswell.

Zimbabwe is the better case simply because it is much more believable.
 
I don't agree with that. The Zimbabwe case doesn't have all the cloak and dagger aspects that this does. It's just a good mass sighting.....Zimbabwe is the better case simply because it is much more believable.

By " more spectacular" I meant that Zimbabwe had humanoids, who conveyed a message; there was more than just a landing.
 
Speaking of the Zimbabwe case (This is a case that I've referenced in conversations quite a few times as one that I find very convincing alongside Allagash, the Hills, Kelly Cahill, Pascagoula, etc.) the witnesses of that event would be adults now. Has anyone heard of any kind of recent follow-up that might have been done? I'm curious as to whether or not their stories have grown more sensational over time.
 
Speaking of the Zimbabwe case (This is a case that I've referenced in conversations quite a few times as one that I find very convincing alongside Allagash, the Hills, Kelly Cahill, Pascagoula, etc.) the witnesses of that event would be adults now. Has anyone heard of any kind of recent follow-up that might have been done? I'm curious as to whether or not their stories have grown more sensational over time.

This was just discussed on some other board. Not long ago a researcher went there to do followup and heard that the participants had left the area. But while asking around he heard stories of other UFO sightings at the same time as the school incident.
 
I had to laugh at the Skeptic talking in the video( the really do craic me up sometimes) They all witnessing a Balloon. A Balloon explains everything. Ya i think they saw something more than just a balloon here mate.
Who here would mistaken a Balloon for a disc craft like object. Hands up ... i think they saw what they saw however with all cases. You can never be sure who saw this event and who are the messers making up stories for their own particular reasons.

---------- Post added at 12:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 AM ----------

Speaking of the Zimbabwe case (This is a case that I've referenced in conversations quite a few times as one that I find very convincing alongside Allagash, the Hills, Kelly Cahill, Pascagoula, etc.) the witnesses of that event would be adults now. Has anyone heard of any kind of recent follow-up that might have been done? I'm curious as to whether or not their stories have grown more sensational over time.

If i was picking ten of the best UFO cases of all time. The Ruwa Zimbabwe case would be one of my top ten cases. Very compelling case and worthy of greater mention in the UFO field of study.
 
Considering how some of you appear to be so thoroughly against the weather balloon idea I guess I might catch some heat for this but I actually consider that to be a viable possibility. According to what I read at skeptoid.com (Yeah, I know. But the article seemed honest enough.):

A weather balloon, reported the next day in the newspaper The Age as a possible explanation for the event. It was launched from Laverton two and a half hours before the sighting, 32 kilometers west-northwest of Westall. The Age reported that the wind was blowing from the west, and if it continued southeast near Clayton South, the balloon could likely have disappeared from view behind the row of trees, very close to 11:00am when the sighting happened.
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4208

And the great majority of the witnesses were children so it seems possible to me that they might make such a mistake. I'm not saying I'm sold on this idea but I don't dismiss it out of hand either. After seeing dozens of videos of people ooing and awing over what are obviously jets dropping flares there's no telling the extent to which group hysteria can transform something perfectly ordinary into the extraordinary.

 
If i was picking ten of the best UFO cases of all time. The Ruwa Zimbabwe case would be one of my top ten cases. Very compelling case and worthy of greater mention in the UFO field of study.

It's a great case but I don't know if I'd rate it that high. So many others have physical evidence and/or adult/expert witnesses.
 
A couple of the photos clearly show the object above the wires and away from the trees. The photo I posted shows the object above the wire and appears to be well away from tree (notice the focus on the tree is sharp and the object is not) and above the field. I like the photo because it has the car in the foreground, the fellow looking directly at the object, and the plane in the sky. I have to wonder if the photo isn't legit and we are seeing some sort of UAV of unknown origin and purpose frightening a couple of old guys on the way home from a party.
 
A couple of the photos clearly show the object above the wires and away from the trees. The photo I posted shows the object above the wire and appears to be well away from tree (notice the focus on the tree is sharp and the object is not) and above the field. I like the photo because it has the car in the foreground, the fellow looking directly at the object, and the plane in the sky.

Skeptics will think of something.::)

I have to wonder if the photo isn't legit and we are seeing some sort of UAV of unknown
origin and purpose frightening a couple of old guys on the way home from a party.

UAV? I dunno; some of the shrimpier humanoid types could probably fit inside.:)
 
UAV? I dunno; some of the shrimpier humanoid types could probably fit inside.

If beings from elsewhere are exploring other planets I think there is a good possibility that they, like us, would send robotic, unmanned probes. It would certainly make as much sense for them as it does for us. Its cheaper, its safer, and avoids the nasty prospect of unintended contact. Granted, you might scare the b-jesus out of a couple of old guys with a camera, but you design the thing to look like a hubcap or two metal bowls glued together as "camouflage." :)
 
Back
Top