NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
It could be, methshin. It's possible. I guess my overall issue is the same as a lot of people here who point out, quite rightly, that we have to be careful about being anthropomorphic or ethnocentric when we speculate on motivations and intentions of 'others'. If any of us were to take a field trip to the Central New Guinea Highlands, pick out a tribe, and speak English to the inhabitants, then report back they were too stupid to understand us, we'd be raked over the coals and pilloried.
In the same way, IF whoever makes these things IS trying to communicate, then they're failing. It's not working because, as a whole, we're not getting it. I realize some people THINK they know, but there is certainly no agreement.
Of course, my own statement is ethnocentric, too. I'm assuming 'they' are attempting to communcate with 'us.' Maybe they're communicating with birds, successfully, and we just don't realize it.
yes, yes, we are aware that there are people that do this too.
Yup, those perfectly rendered mandelbrot sets were created by two old geezers and a two by four in the dead of night with a flashlight. Makes perfect sense to me.
i love the crop circles. i just do not see the alien connection. why would they try to communicate with a crop circle?
To all: if it is so spectacular and improbable, surely some trained scientists would want to examine it, no?
The link ddd provided is worth a look. I'm a little dubious of the claim that 100% of circles fall into this category, but may be. I also question the time element. Just because someone claims they have done something doesn't mean they did. I know for a fact that certain well known UFOs are complete fakes done by humans with an attempt to deceive. Does that mean ALL UFOs are fake?
I would like to see these guys, under controlled and overt conditions, and even with the benefit of daylight being given to them, to perform a complex circle from start to finish with the cameras rolling, before and after shots, the whole nine yards. I'd also like to see what arrangements they have made with the owners of the fields, the farmers, whose crops they have destroyed for the sake of their art. I would think they would be liable for any economic loss suffered by the growers.
I don't have kids, but if my 4 year-old gathered up some friends and went and made a crop-circle, I'd buy the little imp a candy-bar. I don't think I ever did better than catching a shed on fire at that age. I probably had made a crap-circle or two by then.Communication hardly seems a likely explanation for crap circles, unless the intelligence attempting to communicate has the IQ of a bright four year old and cannot read, write, speak or have developed some form of hive exchange of information, like telepathy or olfactory signing and body movements.