Crowned Face instead of Cydonia

[Zandroid]

I've been in touch with JPL and NASA. They weren't going to image the "face" back then if you remember? They did, after a slew of well... spew..... On my birthday actually.

Arguments have not ended in failure, only disagreement. That statement alone makes you a fool not worth discussing any details I know. If you truly want to know answers, stop acting like you know them.

There is no reasonable reason to discuss photos. PERIOD. One camp will say the other camp faked it, or vice vers/// You'll need to go there (Mars) and dig. The fact you even argue with certainty shows you know not about proof, only preference.

Now, go conclude Jim H. lives on mars because there's a pic of Kermit. PLease. Oh, and the smiley fave too. Have a Nice day came from Martians, NOT people reading into things. And, bigfoot, pepsi cans, weeble woobles. You name it. Some dolt, has seen it on Mars. With your certainty. Those who remain unconvinced, aren't your nemesis. Your stupidity is.

"Crowned Face on Mars" as you see above.
The odds of such a detailed face happening to just be random natural feature, are to the point of impossible that it is not created, by us or some other form.

Now maybe you think "The Statue of Liberty" just occured like a face in the clowds and nobody created it, its what you are hoping to prove. This is how silly your argument really is.
Statistical chances of probability that "The Crowned Face" as seen above just happened to be there by chance from rocks forming into an obviously symetrical, proportional, detailed face, tells anybody with a logical brain someone put it there.

 

[Zandroid]

This image is in the public domain now, so if any spooks, or lookyloos viewing this its too late to cover this artificial structure up, and it is artificial.

Now I enjoy Robert Zubrin's thoughts on colonize Mars, but someone has been there before, and or there now, so unless Robert wants to go in and take over someone elses planet we have to live under the Martians rules.

 

[wicro]

"Crowned Face on Mars" as you see above.
The odds of such a detailed face happening to just be random natural feature, are to the point of impossible that it is not created, by us or some other form.

Now maybe you think "The Statue of Liberty" just occured like a face in the clowds and nobody created it, its what you are hoping to prove. This is how silly your argument really is.
Statistical chances of probability that "The Crowned Face" as seen above just happened to be there by chance from rocks forming into an obviously symetrical, proportional, detailed face, tells anybody with a logical brain someone put it there.

Out of curiosity how do you calculate the odds of a 'detailed' face being artificial or random? I would have thought through the sheer amount of images, that there is no criteria (i.e size, angle, profile etc), and that our poor monkey brains suffer from pareidolia that the chances of there not being a perceived face would be rather low.

 

[Schuyler]

Humans are excellent at facial recognition. We even see faces that aren't really there. This is a perfect example. It's not even very good. I've seen better faces in grease rivulets in frying pans or sticking out of a cat litter box. There are any number of better 'faces' on Earth. Just google 'Old Man Rock' and look at the images. There's an excellent face made of rocks in the second "Pride & Prejudice" (The TV series, not the recent movie). Yet no one claims these Earth-based 'faces' were the result of human intervention. They are simply natural formations. Look here for some excellent examples: http://www.needlesports.com/rockfaces/rockfaces.htm. So much for calculating the odds as 'impossible.' If someone wants to base their reputation on shilling for this so-called Mars face, by all means go ahead, but be prepared to be the subject of well-deserved ridicule as a reward for your efforts.

 

[skunkape]

Future visitors from another world may wonder if this is a sign that Earth once had intelligent life.

 

[bobheck]

"Crowned Face on Mars" as you see above.
The odds of such a detailed face happening to just be random natural feature, are to the point of impossible that it is not created, by us or some other form.

Now maybe you think "The Statue of Liberty" just occured like a face in the clowds and nobody created it, its what you are hoping to prove. This is how silly your argument really is.
Statistical chances of probability that "The Crowned Face" as seen above just happened to be there by chance from rocks forming into an obviously symetrical, proportional, detailed face, tells anybody with a logical brain someone put it there.

This image is in the public domain now, so if any spooks, or lookyloos viewing this its too late to cover this artificial structure up, and it is artificial.

Now I enjoy Robert Zubrin's thoughts on colonize Mars, but someone has been there before, and or there now, so unless Robert wants to go in and take over someone elses planet we have to live under the Martians rules.

Zandroid. My god, man. Are you delusional? I had trouble even making it out. There is no symmetry, and it is clearly part of the natural formation in which it is found. The crown is a cliff that spans nearly the entire right 2/3's of the image. The rest of the image is wind-blown dunes and bumps.

 

[skunkape]

Bobheck...you wouldn't happen to be kin to the mysterious pipe-smoking salesman on the wall in young Sarah Palin's dorm here would you?

 

[bobheck]

Bobheck...you wouldn't happen to be kin to the mysterious pipe-smoking salesman on the wall in young Sarah Palin's dorm here would you?

uummmm....

Nope, I just don't get the reference. Throw me a bone.

Edit: nm, got it: Dobbs. I'll take that as a compliment 8)

 

[Ron Collins]

The face at the beginning of this thread is take from NASA. If you still don't see a face then I suggest you get glasses.

If you are convinced you don't see a face and want to know more, I can give you the data NASA provided after that image was taken by them, and processed at JPL.

Ask JPL about this image, maybe they faked it

Arguments against this image have ended in utter failure to post anything.

Really? Do you not see the congruence in the adjacent geology?

I see a huge reason why this is not an engineered monument.

Geologically, this is an absurd place for any civilization to build a massive face monument. Monuments are built for exposure. They are built to inspire or to remember. This face is not in a location that promotes these things.

This is the link to the wide angle area this strip was pulled from. The geology of the area is pretty apparent.
http://barsoom.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/jpegctxmaps/M0203052.jpg

Hundreds and hundreds of craters. Crater walls make bad and places for construction and even worse places for monuments. You do not need to be a world renowned architect (or giant mountain sculptor) to know that crater walls would be more susceptible to decay and erosion. Thus, bad places to plan public monumental works.

Questions:
1 -- If this was a monument in a crater how do the "people" get in to view it?
2 -- Why is the "face" constructed in a crater wall along the slope of the wall?
3 -- How does this "face" show a rapid departure from the surrounding geology enough to make it noticeably artificial?
4 -- Does it make sense to be here?

I think that this is a wonderfully natural formation that just to happens to remind folks of a face. Nothing more. That is just my opinion. If someday i am proven wrong, nobody would be happier than I!

 

[Schuyler]

Actually, there is more than one 'face' in that picture. i do not have a drawing program on the PC I'm using, so a text description is all I have. But consider: There is also an 'ape' face.

Look at the first face.
Look at the face's left eye (on your right).
Imagine that eye now looking to the left in profile rather than straight ahead, the ape's left eye.
Note the ape's flattened snout down to its mouth just below the original 'mouth'.
Now go from the eye to the right until you see the ape's round ear.

Quite obviously the second face in profile proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that evolution from ape to man happened on Mars! See how easy it is to come to wild conclusions? Prove me wrong!

Oh, and if you can't see it, you need glasses.

 

[skunkape]

uummmm....

Nope, I just don't get the reference. Throw me a bone.

Edit: nm, got it: Dobbs. I'll take that as a compliment 8)

Your avatar looks like NHGH. Made me wonder.
...and back to the thread...
That is obviously Kid from Kin 'n Play. It must have been Martians that made it.

 

[skunkape]

biddy, biddy, biddy