DISCLOSURE - SURE

[mike]

I'm always open to new ideas/theorys.
But at the end of the day I need to ask where did this "data" come from.

It does have a scientology ring to it, thats for sure.

The issue here, and its a common error, is to present this stuff as "The Answer"........

If you are going to posit some out there idea, always start with the disclaimer its just your POV, not "The Answer".

Internalise whatever theory you like, thats a human thing to do, religion is replete with examples of every crackpot idea you can think of, but when you externalise it as "the truth" then thats where the problems start.

 

[trainedobserver]

Exactly Mike. Where does this data come from? How was it communicated? Any portion of it verifiable? How many assumptions does it require? I think the big tell, the absolute indication that such things can be be discarded from serious consideration only after a cursory examination is the human centrism of the world-view. All of these cosmic soap operas have the gods and their failed creations overly preoccupied with the actions and even the thoughts of individual human beings. The absurdity is so glaring in that it requires a human-centric world view to hold up and we know that human beings are no more the center of the universe than the Earth has proven to be.

Having said that, I was digging the Lovecraft-like sense of impending cosmic doom radiating from the Key's prose.

 

[dannytorrance]

ROFLMAO. He's pulling the ole chains dudes. Man, is this the infamous Paracast forums? Where's ole Davey B? At least he would be kicking some tail. The hosts of the show seem like nice enough guys and they try. I actually like both of them. But, some of you really need to step back and read a post in it's context.

 

[Angel of Ioren]

He's been banned and now this thread will be closed.