NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Sorry, don't mean to be difficult, but I still don't understand what you are talking about. Retracting creation?? I just don't get it.If there is some agent advancing creation - then why cannot there be an agent retracting creation? Matter vs Antimatter - in a sense.
The Ying andd Yang, Newton's 3rd, Oscar and Felix, Two Face from Batman, the list goes on and on. If there is good then it follows that there is evil. The typical christian God is both of these things. The argument can be made that our concept of the devil can be melded with our concept of God. Two sides of the same deified coin. Who knows.
In the imortal words of Denis Miller..."Fuck it. Who wants pie?"
So again I ask, objectively is there anything that could be considered real "evil"?
I read a case a few months ago, somewhere in the country -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2746778.ece
Now, I suppose you could argue that he was under the influence of drink and drugs - however they had the conscience to make the decision to be able to record is actions on the mobile phone and publish it on U-tube.
Then you have the cases of Fred West, Hindley and Sutcliffe, Miyazaki, Jeffrey Dahmer.
So I ask, objectively how does science account for these - of course, you will argue because of some affect in there lives, damaged childhood or whatever - but before we immediately rush there defence, excusing them because of there past we must know - is this conclusive, is it tested, can psychology say for definite and without doubt?
Has anyone EVER observed something that could even slightly be considered EVIL outside of human activities?
Animals that kill and eat people do it for food, not out of evil doing.
Volcanoes erupt, earthquakes ...umm quake, tornadoes devistate, etc. etc., but they are natural forces of nature explainable by science and common sense.
Diseases? That's nature again.
Even what we may perceive as actual human evil acts can be attributed to bad brain wiring or bad nurturing in a bad environment.
Hell, humans can't even agree what constitutes "evil". Suicide is seen as honorable in Asia, yet it's an unforgiveable sin in the Christian dominated West.
I can't find any evidence at all for the existence of "evil" in the natural world, or really the human one either.
Can anyone name ANY? Even just one?