NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I hit 'Like' but seems an odd thing to 'Like' - ya know? One of those moments when it feels like an explanation is in order - I agree that privatized water is insanity - and runaway greed. Shame on them/us!
In the April issue of 'Scientific American' -
Earth Will Cross the Climate Danger Threshold by 2036 - Scientific American
From March 24, 2014 - a 'moderate' view if there can be such in such a situation - ticking off all the boxes of concern - the 'unknown unknowns' - the man is talking sense -
A YouTube poster puts it this way, it's always nice to get the 'how will this impact my life' scenario: "Though we probably have underestimated the outward radiation increase due to flawed modelling. There will probably be some lag due to the build up of more mitigating cloud cover but those are just short term effects.
"The problem with 'reading the signs' with this sort of issue is the suddenness of spike once all the loops start to add to the loop effect and actually begin reinforcing the loops themselves across the board. It won't merely be a runaway issue. Think of it more in terms of warp speed.
"The ultimate delaying factor is not an increase in cloud cover but the willingness, if you will, of the oceans to take it up the ass, CO2 wise. If predictions are correct, we should see their [the oceans'] willingness to falter as early as 2016 after the the coming El Niño has had its way with them. And if they [the oceans] stop taking up more CO2 or even start to expel that stuff be sure to tune into the Weather Channel on a regular basis. No Brat Pitt movie will be able to top it and it's all in natural 3D!
"In the past, CO2 rise has always been a side effect to warming, never a trigger.
"We better hope we are up for an ice age this century."
I 'liked' but same ambiguity - I just appreciate what you're saying @stonehart.
As far as what I know from my own experience - I do know that planting cycles are being impacted - that means local food production. But I think I am in a sufficiently vigorous local milieu that we will figure it out as it happens, as individuals and as a municipality - even as a state. I do not anticipate a societal breakdown - we will just have to 'adjust' far more rapidly than anticipated. I'm in California and we already have systems in place for catastrophe (earthquakes). Los Angeles has factored in a rise in sea level in its civic planning - though the plans have 2040 as the target date to be ready for.
As I'm writing this it occurs to me to get involved in some local planning. Has to be incredibly complex as so may people are not making choices with 'extinction' as the background narrative. Would be interesting to be involved in, though.