Han
piscator ψ
This is a very difficult situation, I want to help, but I really don't know how. This is not the first time I have seen this type of situation.
My opinion is that although it wouldn't be possible to prove a crime had taken place the trauma suffered by the abductee could.
If we imagine that the same type of trauma was inflicted in a non-paranormal scenario, even if no one could or had yet been prosecuted for inflicting the suffering, the victim should be given support.
I care little if the events in an abduction are "real" or just "imagined" the consequences are just as devastating either way, and it could even be argued that because UFO's are not "real" the repercussions are more profound.
I think what I am trying to say is that if it was up to me I would treat victims of abduction as if a crime has taken place, and by this I don't mean a police investigation, I mean that the victim should have the same right to "victim support services" (counseling etc).
If the abductee was based in the UK they would be able to access existing healthcare services with a referral, but I don't know how it works elsewhere.
This has all reminded me of what I find to be one of the most disturbing aspects of "pop culture" UFO's, and that is the absolute disregard and lack of respect that "victims" are shown.
I could go into a big tirade about how it is not just in UFOlogy, I mean look at all the "real" crime shows, but as this is about abductions I will stick to that: I find it tragic that people are payed to recount what must have been or continue to be absolutely horrific experiences in front of a paying crowd, lest we forget they used to sell tickets to visit bedlum or to watch a life changing operation.
What I mean is: that if your claim to fame is that you are a victim of a famous criminal, and then you are payed to speak and relive that experience to a paying audience, that must be a very lonely place.
I think that if you removed the paranormal element it would be impossible to imagine a similar situation in today's society, or at least without serious moral objections from Joe Bloggs (John Doe US) and academics alike. to clarify what I am getting at:
How many people here would pay a victim of a heinous crime recount it in lurid detail?
There is a time, place and context for discussing such traumas, and yes in some cases speaking publicly can help in terms of both prevention and awareness, but that doesn't seem to be the goal in the case of UFOs.
It is very easy to critisise but I genuinely feel that an organisations such as "MUFON" and others should take much more responsibility in helping victims of abduction, the last thing I am suggesting is that they should be care givers, rather that they should take a much more active role in helping victims find the services they require.
But academia also needs to do more, it is easily demonstrable that a perceived crime can be as damaging as a "real" one, and the consequences are just as drastic.
My opinion is that although it wouldn't be possible to prove a crime had taken place the trauma suffered by the abductee could.
If we imagine that the same type of trauma was inflicted in a non-paranormal scenario, even if no one could or had yet been prosecuted for inflicting the suffering, the victim should be given support.
I care little if the events in an abduction are "real" or just "imagined" the consequences are just as devastating either way, and it could even be argued that because UFO's are not "real" the repercussions are more profound.
I think what I am trying to say is that if it was up to me I would treat victims of abduction as if a crime has taken place, and by this I don't mean a police investigation, I mean that the victim should have the same right to "victim support services" (counseling etc).
If the abductee was based in the UK they would be able to access existing healthcare services with a referral, but I don't know how it works elsewhere.
This has all reminded me of what I find to be one of the most disturbing aspects of "pop culture" UFO's, and that is the absolute disregard and lack of respect that "victims" are shown.
I could go into a big tirade about how it is not just in UFOlogy, I mean look at all the "real" crime shows, but as this is about abductions I will stick to that: I find it tragic that people are payed to recount what must have been or continue to be absolutely horrific experiences in front of a paying crowd, lest we forget they used to sell tickets to visit bedlum or to watch a life changing operation.
What I mean is: that if your claim to fame is that you are a victim of a famous criminal, and then you are payed to speak and relive that experience to a paying audience, that must be a very lonely place.
I think that if you removed the paranormal element it would be impossible to imagine a similar situation in today's society, or at least without serious moral objections from Joe Bloggs (John Doe US) and academics alike. to clarify what I am getting at:
How many people here would pay a victim of a heinous crime recount it in lurid detail?
There is a time, place and context for discussing such traumas, and yes in some cases speaking publicly can help in terms of both prevention and awareness, but that doesn't seem to be the goal in the case of UFOs.
It is very easy to critisise but I genuinely feel that an organisations such as "MUFON" and others should take much more responsibility in helping victims of abduction, the last thing I am suggesting is that they should be care givers, rather that they should take a much more active role in helping victims find the services they require.
But academia also needs to do more, it is easily demonstrable that a perceived crime can be as damaging as a "real" one, and the consequences are just as drastic.