musictomyears said:
RonCollins, sorry for being a bit blunt here, but the question is not whether or not *you* think that a cover-up makes sense, but what is actually occurring on the ground. If those people who are obsessed with controlling our lives were anything other than criminally insane, we wouldn't have this discussion. Let me also say - and I don't want you to take this personally - that there are millions of armchair researchers who think they know it all, because they have read a few books and watched a few videos. They know Jack shit. Unless you have mixed with people who actually work in this field, you are clueless.
The Question was “Government Secrecy, Justified or Not?” with an opinion poll at the top… Yes, it is about my opinion. I have freely admitted, on this forum no less, that I am merely a 3rd string arm-chair QB. So….treat me like I know jack shit and give me some valid reasons to believe you.
Understand, that I fully expect you and others to type some insult laden diatribe about how stupid I am and how I don’t get it. Mind you, these are the same people that bitch and groan about others who, lacking proof, float the “Believe me, I know. My neighbor was in the CIA!” mantra.
musictomyears said:
The superpowers already have at their disposal sufficient destructive power to blow up the entire planet, *several**times**over*. They don't need any faster planes, bigger bombs or cheaper fuels. They don't even need more money - or if they would, they'd simply print more. The elite operates outside of what regular people like you and me consider normal.
Do you honestly believe this? Yes, superpowers and some not-so-super powers have nuclear arms. The reason they will not be used was clearly defined during the cold war…Mutual Assured Destruction. Nuclear weapons are a status symbol. They are the essentially price of admission for better digs at the UN.
Modern Warfare is not about this. Modern warfare concentrates on relatively small units with ultra mission specific tactical advantages. We need faster and more tactically specific planes, vehicles, and ships/boats to accomplish specific missions. During the planning stages of these missions, it is the small incidentals that occupy the commanders. Things like, how do we provide emergency extraction, how much and what supplies are needed for the mission. Things like, how much fuel a plane or helicopter will need to stay on station are not to be glossed over.
Your basic theme is “Its all about the money. The sooner you realize this the better off you’ll be.” I don’t disagree with this. However, take a look at the opposite side for a minute. The US military spends a bunch of money to train each soldier. In 1998 it was almost 65k per soldier on average. That’s just basic training. Add the money to equip, maintain, feed, and transport these troops and that is a huge investment per soldier.
Frankly, you are talking like someone who has a mega-preconceived notion about the military and those who run it. It’s a bit of duality really.
musictomyears said:
The magic word is "control". Control over populations, control over land and other assets, control over resources. Money is only a tool for exerting control, and wars the means for frightening populations into submission. If you expect to detect straight forward logic in the actions of the elite, you are barking up the wrong tree. Their particular brand of logic is irrational.
Wow, this is staring to sound familiar.
=== From the movie “So I married an Axe Murderer”
Stuart: Well, it's a well known fact, Sonny Jim, that there's a secret society of the five wealthiest people in the world, known as The Pentavirate, who run everything in the world, including the newspapers, and meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado, known as The Meadows.
Tony: So who's in this Pentavirate?
Stuart: The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, and Colonel Sanders before he went tits up. Oh, I hated the Colonel with is wee beady eyes, and that smug look on his face. "Oh, you're gonna buy my chicken! Ohhhhh!"
====
musictomyears said:
Free energy - and by extension information about UFOs - is being suppressed because governments and corporations do not want exotic technologies to be used *by anyone*, including their own military and official space programmes. It is a Pandora's box that, once opened, can never be closed. There is no "let's have a bit of anti-gravity here, and a bit of over-unity there". It doesn't work like that.
So, let me get this straight… “Governments” (plural) and “Corporations” (also plural) all get together (ostensibly at The Meadows every third Teusday) and agree on this? Really? You don’t think…and I’m just throwing this out there, that “Corporations” would use this technology to increase profit margins?
musictomyears said:
Whoever reads this is free to disagree with me, and not believe a single word. Be my guest. However, you can't say you haven't been warned.
Well, I do disagree with you. Listen, National Security concerns are why the US government has not embraced disclosure. I don’t have the foggiest clue why others have also opted to stay silent. Maybe, its because they don’t know what the hell it is. As for the Pentavirate, I think that is a separate thread.