H
hopeful skeptic
Guest
I don't know that Messrs. Steinberg and Biedny could have expected anything different from their efforts than what they're receiving: spirited, contentious debate on their show topics. If you start a podcast with the avowed purpose of getting to the "truth" behind claimed "paranormal" phenomena, why would you not expect debate and discussion to ensue? Isn't that the purpose of a forum? Don't we think this helps the show? Let me tell you something: controversy immensely helps a show. Immensely.
The forum here is almost completely devoid of the usual nastiness I see on other forums. I'm only sorry that paranormal proponents misuse the term "negativity" when they really mean "reasoned, logical critique." Of course, I can only imagine how difficult it is to defend the (often) indefensible.
Must be tough.
The forum here is almost completely devoid of the usual nastiness I see on other forums. I'm only sorry that paranormal proponents misuse the term "negativity" when they really mean "reasoned, logical critique." Of course, I can only imagine how difficult it is to defend the (often) indefensible.
Must be tough.