Michael Allen
Paranormal Adept
I disagree in part.
There is absolutely no question that governments, particularly the United States government, has used the UFO phenomenon as a smokescreen for its own secret projects, and for other purposes related to intelligence gathering. Anyone who thinks otherwise is hopelessly naive, and doesn't have a grasp on the history of the subject. More than a few cases in Hall's work are most likely explainable as one or the other.
However, to say that the "GH" is the only explanation is patently absurd.
Paul
There are several problems with this statement.
(1) You have to distinguish between "usage" meaning (a) the government employing actual craft to fool the public from (b) the use of documentation, misinformation, and hoaxed artifacts , etc. and (c) the employment of individuals who pretend to experience contact with the said phenomenon.
In the former case, the statement "no question..." does not apply, as this would imply you have proof that a UFO was in fact an IFO. Ideally the scientific ufologists would weed out these special IFO cases from the start. In a less ideal situation, you have the government failing to convince everyone along their perlocutionary intentions.
So, in short., if you have incontrovertible evidence that the U.S. government utilized UFO phenomenon, then you effectively push (by that same evidence) the phenomenon out of the unidentified pool.
As for (b) and (c) --> these situations are irrelevant to the "governmental hypothesis" which states that the government is behind the creation of the actual phenomenon.
In short we probably should make these (and perhaps other) clarifications/distinctions.
(The hopelessly naive are usually created by the hopelessly vague--the devilish details might remove some of this doubt.)
So based on these observations and clarifications, I claim that there IS a question concerning the government employment of the ufo phenomenon (in any sense enumerated above). If you accept the affirmative answer as given, then certainly you'll need to call into question the possible employment of fake ufo related documents to spoil ETH. And...I think that would be case (b) mentioned above, if I am not mistaken.
---------- Post added at 06:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:18 PM ----------
It is difficult to imagine a scenario where there is only one hypothesis (a UH -Unified Hypotheses ) that explains everything about the phenomena. I have always suspected that we have yet to actually imagine what the true explanation actually might be. IMHO the truth is probably stranger than we can actually imagine.
This is because the data may show separate causal streams--one stream dealing with human genetic memory (the collective unconscious), another dealing with real physical events (i.e. aliens from other star systems) as well as beings that are in a nearby "world" or universe that happens to collide with ours (perhaps caused by two branes converging to a point for a brief moment). So the truth may be simpler if we narrow the scope. Lumping all unexplained phenomenon into the "paranormal" bucket is both ontologically deceptive and counterproductive.