JFK Assassination Conspiracy Photo

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

Hey, if you want to believe that Greer did the dirty deed, by all means ... be my guest.

Decker

I believe Greer killed jfk only because I proved it beyond any doubt and anyone can see that by reading my blog. There is 10 times more evidence against Greer than OJ because we have three films that prove film alteration to hide Greer's movements that killed Kennedy. Even though only a few people gave testimony for a Greer shot, there are several witnesses who provide corroboration for this fact.

 

[pixelsmith]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

it is possible you have a crappy display and can't really see what you are posting because that is not a gun.

 

[Angel of Ioren]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

I believe Greer killed jfk only because I proved it beyond any doubt and anyone can see that by reading my blog. There is 10 times more evidence against Greer than OJ because we have three films that prove film alteration to hide Greer's movements that killed Kennedy. Even though only a few people gave testimony for a Greer shot, there are several witnesses who provide corroboration for this fact.

Well, you better be careful then - "they" may come to get you soon.

---------- Post added at 11:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 AM ----------

it is possible you have a crappy display and can't really see what you are posting because that is not a gun.

That was funny.

 

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

it is possible you have a crappy display and can't really see what you are posting because that is not a gun.

It is possible you have a crappy display and can't really see what is happening because that is a gun Greer is placing in his left hand and that bleached gun flies to the floor in frame 319. Saying you can't see the clear view of the gun is NOT a defense because the film was altered to the hide the gun that they could NOT edit out.

<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: ad_showthread_firstpost_sig --><!-- END TEMPLATE: ad_showthread_firstpost_sig -->

 

[pixelsmith]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

The reflection is absent from Mary's pic, nix and muchmore films and you are ignoring those brand new facts and posing the same silly denials that were started more than 20 years ago.

yes you are correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film, Do you really think the specular highlights would be the same from different directions?... and thank you once again for proving you are wrong with your own photos and video. It is very helpful. PLEASE post more visual proof that you are wrong, this is fun...

Ok... it is plain to me now that this is a joke... there is no way you could be serious.

 

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

yes you are correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film, Do you really think the specular highlights would be the same from different directions?... and thank you once again for proving you are wrong with your own photos and video. It is very helpful. PLEASE post more visual proof that you are wrong, this is fun...

yes I am correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film. Do you really think the specular highlights would not be present on top of Roy's head? You can't prove this is possible because there is NO other side to the top of the head.

---------- Post added at 12:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 PM ----------

Well, you better be careful then - "they" may come to get you soon.

---------- Post added at 11:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 AM ----------



That was funny.

Mocking his silly post was funny.
It is possible you have a crappy display and can't really see what is happening because that is a gun Greer is placing in his left hand and that bleached gun flies to the floor in frame 319.

---------- Post added at 12:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 PM ----------

yes you are correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film, Do you really think the specular highlights would be the same from different directions?... and thank you once again for proving you are wrong with your own photos and video. It is very helpful. PLEASE post more visual proof that you are wrong, this is fun...

Ok... it is plain to me now that this is a joke... there is no way you could be serious.

yes I am correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film. Do you really think the specular highlights would not be present on top of Roy's head? You can't prove this is possible because there is NO other side to the top of the head.

Ok... it is plain to me now that you are a joke... there is no way you could be serious.


---------- Post added at 12:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:04 PM ----------

yes you are correct about the reflections being absent from other photos and film, Do you really think the specular highlights would be the same from different directions?... and thank you once again for proving you are wrong with your own photos and video. It is very helpful. PLEASE post more visual proof that you are wrong, this is fun...

Ok... it is plain to me now that this is a joke... there is no way you could be serious.

Connally's reflection is accurately depicted in both the pic and film while the fake blob of white is missing from Roy's head in Mary's pic and the two other films.

 

[Kieran]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

I'm posting visual facts with zero challenge. That is exactly what's happenning here and any where I've posted where people denied facts.

The object that you claim is a handgun has the wrong shape for it to be a handgun (when i say it has the wrong shape it actually looks more like a space-weapon, a weapon you see in movies like Star Wars) you really do need to get your eyes checked friend. The anomaly when it is shown on the clips you posted has a color, and the same color appears on the drivers head at the back, when he turns around to look at Kennedy.

The front passengers head just at that time the driver turned around, well both of their heads get that light or silver effect on top their heads, if only happened to one of front passengers the anomaly would be still solvable, but more puzzling. But the fact the light effect color effect appears on both the driver and front passenger hair is conclusive that it was not a handgun. It so obvious it amazes me you can't see that!

 

[pixelsmith]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

Thank you again for helping prove yourself wrong. In the last photo you can see it is shot at a different angle as evidenced by the windshield. It still has some reflective properties because it is metal. In the image on the right you can still see a little light on the head.... or it could be another gun i suppose.

 

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

Thank you again for helping prove yourself wrong. In the last photo you can see it is shot at a different angle as evidenced by the windshield. It still has some reflective properties because it is metal. In the image on the right you can still see a little light on the head.... or it could be another gun i suppose.

Thank you again for helping prove yourself wrong. In the last photo you can see it is shot at a different angle as evidenced by the windshield. In the image on the right ,the top of his head is exposed and no exaggerated white is present because it's fake and so are your silly posts.
<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: ad_showthread_firstpost_sig --><!-- END TEMPLATE: ad_showthread_firstpost_sig -->

---------- Post added at 12:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 PM ----------

The object that you claim is a handgun has the wrong shape for it to be a handgun (when i say it has the wrong shape it actually looks more like a space-weapon, a weapon you see in movies like Star Wars) you really do need to get your eyes checked friend. The anomaly when it is shown on the clips you posted has a color, and the same color appears on the drivers head at the back, when he turns around to look at Kennedy.

The front passengers head just at that time the driver turned around, well both of their heads get that light or silver effect on top their heads, if only happened to one of front passengers the anomaly would be still solvable, but more puzzling. But the fact the light effect color effect appears on both the driver and front passenger hair is conclusive that it was not a handgun. It so obvious it amazes me you can't see that!

You are ignoring the fact that Greer's left arm crosses in the nix film which proves the goons altered the zfilm to hide those movements which killed Kennedy.

---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 PM ----------

The object that you claim is a handgun has the wrong shape for it to be a handgun (when i say it has the wrong shape it actually looks more like a space-weapon, a weapon you see in movies like Star Wars) you really do need to get your eyes checked friend. The anomaly when it is shown on the clips you posted has a color, and the same color appears on the drivers head at the back, when he turns around to look at Kennedy.

The front passengers head just at that time the driver turned around, well both of their heads get that light or silver effect on top their heads, if only happened to one of front passengers the anomaly would be still solvable, but more puzzling. But the fact the light effect color effect appears on both the driver and front passenger hair is conclusive that it was not a handgun. It so obvious it amazes me you can't see that!

The object that looks like a handgun is the alteration that covers the movements for the zfilm but that visually happen in the nix film. The alteration displays and arm, hand and gun. It has the exact shape for it to be a handgun ( you really do need to get your eyes checked). The anomaly is the alteration committed by the government to hide jfk's real assassin, the driver.

 

[pixelsmith]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

if you were driving with both hands on the wheel and wanted to see way back behind you in a limo like that, it would not be unreasonable for you to take your left arm off the wheel so you could could turn far enough to see behind you. In the zfilm you can plainly see Greers left shoulder in the film, it would be pretty hard to move your left shoulder that far without taking your left hand off the steering wheel.

 

[Kieran]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

---------- Post added at 12:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 PM ----------[/COLOR]



You are ignoring the fact that Greer's left arm crosses in the nix film which proves the goons altered the zfilm to hide those movements which killed Kennedy.

---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 PM ----------



The object that looks like a handgun is the alteration that covers the movements for the zfilm but that visually happen in the nix film. The alteration displays and arm, hand and gun. It has the exact shape for it to be a handgun ( you really do need to get your eyes checked). The anomaly is the alteration committed by the government to hide jfk's real assassin, the driver.

Your posting lot of clips so I have to study everyone of them , the Zfilm you don't argue I am correct on what I say and others claim, your belief though it was messed with the Zfilm, ok show me the nix film or have you posted it already, I see if there is any differences between the two films.

 

[icculus]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

This is silly. The "gun" is simply a reflection of the top of the passenger's head for f*ck's sake. Geez.

 

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

if you were driving with both hands on the wheel and wanted to see way back behind you in a limo like that, it would not be unreasonable for you to take your left arm off the wheel so you could could turn far enough to see behind you. In the zfilm you can plainly see Greers left shoulder in the film, it would be pretty hard to move your left shoulder that far without taking your left hand off the steering wheel.

The bulk of evidence for Greer killing jfk is proving film alteration, primarily the main film, Zapruder. Greer has both hands off the wheel at frame 241 because he's placing the gun in his left hand before he even turns the first time. This visual fact has to be ignored and has been until I started posting about it. He never places it back on wheel because we can see his left crossing in the nix film. These facts all by themselves prove Greer killed jfk. FRAME 241.

All they did was crop upward during those moments when Greer moved the gun from the lower position to near his right collarbone. He simply pushed the gun over his shoulder and fired. Frame 278 is the last frame the fitted gun is seen and the following frames are cropped upward.

 

[Angel of Ioren]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

Okay, so 7forever, how much time have you spent on this idea? If you are not a troll and are not trying to pull of some sort of Kaufmannesque joke, I feel bad for you. Sort of how I feel bad for the people on the show Hoarders.
I wish you luck. Hopefully you will find help.

 

[7forever]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

This is silly. The "gun" is simply a reflection of the top of the passenger's head for f*ck's sake. Geez.

The only silly people are those who claim authority of which they have none. You haven't quoted any of my posts because you're just like everyone else. YOU CANNOT challenge any of what I've posted because if anyone could, it would be picked apart in a logical and deliberate fashion. I've made claims and backed them up with visual proof for my conclusions. That's the only authority in a murder case and if the defense can debunk or challenge the evidence against the accused. Everything Greer is doing in these films is consistent with him shooting jfk and the pathetic 1963 forgery that followed to hide his guilt.

 

[The Pair of Cats]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

The only silly people are those who claim authority of which they have none. You haven't quoted any of my posts because you're just like everyone else. YOU CANNOT challenge any of what I've posted because if anyone could, it would be picked apart in a logical and deliberate fashion. I've made claims and backed them up with visual proof for my conclusions. That's the only authority in a murder case and if the defense can debunk or challenge the evidence against the accused. Everything Greer is doing in these films is consistent with him shooting jfk and the pathetic 1963 forgery that followed to hide his guilt.

Then why hasn't the case reopened and Greer officilally recognized as the murderer if your evidence is so overwhelmingly strong.

 

[Decker]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

This will probably be my last post on this subject so I recommend you pay attention.

When this vid first surfaced and I saw it, it was in November of 1988 in the den of John Lear in Las Vegas. As I later discovered when speaking to Lars Hansson, Hansson told me that at the time they secured a "very poor copy" of the Zapruder film, it was about a 5th gen. copy. Remember now, originally the film was in color but Hansson and his two fellow researchers took it to a lab of someone Hansson knew, they "washed" all the color out to enhance the contrasts, and were looking to see what they could see. The reflection off Roy Kellerman's head (the Secret Service guy in the passenger seat) for just a second, looks like a .45 caliber automatic, and Kennedy is shot as this flash happens. It is obvious to me, and I have had extensive experience with handguns, rifles, submachineguns, assault rifles and shotguns, that there is NO muzzle blast from what looked like (for a split second) a pistol. I mentioned this to Lars and he told me this also became apparent to him and his two guys. But, he made copies and gave them out to several people. His objective then was to try to secure funding to further their research and also to GET A BETTER COPY OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM.

One of the people he gave a copy to was John Lear. At the time Lear was working on his all encompassing theory on aliens, UFOs, secret Govt. programs, and what he saw then as THE ALIEN PLOT! And do not loose sight of this very important fact ... THE NOW VHS TAPE WAS AT LEAST A 6TH GENERATION COPY. Lear copied his video and sent it to Bill Cooper. NOW THIS FUCKING THING WAS A 7TH GENERATION COPY! Cooper suddenly remembered that he saw all this in his secret U.S. Navy documents way back when ... he was briefing top Navy Brass on all the fucking secrets of the fucking Cosmos. Oh yeah, and as he said in radio interviews, on TV, and told people ... he had been looking for this tape (not film??) for YEARS! This by the way was in 1989-90.

Hansson was by now convinced that the driver, Bill Greer, shooting JFK was bogus. He told Lear it was bogus, and when he found out Cooper was pushing this at lectures, and now was selling it to people at his lectures with prices up to $35.00 per copy, Hansson tried to get Cooper to stop. Cooper told Hansson to go fuck himself. Oh yeah, and now we are talking about an 8TH GENERATION COPY! Oh, one more thing, in this video, narrated by Hansson, he mentions a nickle or chrome plated .45 caliber automatic as theorized Hansson, being used by Greer. However, now it was apparent by anyone with firearms knowledge, there is no FUCKING MUZZLE BLAST! Even Wild Bill Cooper at some point realized this. So, what does Bill do? Well, I will fucking tell you ... Cooper sends it off to JAPAN ... has it re-colorized ... had Lars Hanssons narration REMOVED ... and good ol' Wild Bill Cooper started telling folks at his lectures, radio shows, and TV, that the gun, as used by Bill Greer ... was a "SUPER-DUPER TOP-SECRET CIA AIRGUN ... SHOOTING PELLETS FILLED WITH SHELL-FISH TOXIN." Oh yeah 7-forever, by now this fucking discredited film is at least a 9TH OR 10TH GENERATION FILM.

Buddy, you are full of shit .. like I told you ... I WAS FUCKING THERE .. I KNEW ALL THE FUCKING PLAYERS AND WITNESSED IT AS IT HAPPENED. UNDERSTAND?

Decker

 

[The Pair of Cats]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

The motorcade passes 4 people at the point that you say that Greer shoots JFK. Why hadn't any of them come forward to support your evidence? At least 2 of them would have been within 10 feet or so of the car at that point.

 

[pixelsmith]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

The bulk of evidence for Greer killing jfk is proving film alteration, primarily the main film, Zapruder. Greer has both hands off the wheel at frame 241 because he's placing the gun in his left hand before he even turns the first time. This visual fact has to be ignored and has been until I started posting about it. He never places it back on wheel because we can see his left crossing in the nix film. These facts all by themselves prove Greer killed jfk. FRAME 241.

All they did was crop upward during those moments when Greer moved the gun from the lower position to near his right collarbone. He simply pushed the gun over his shoulder and fired. Frame 278 is the last frame the fitted gun is seen and the following frames are cropped upward.

In your top photo I see clear evidence that Jackie killed her husband. See the gun in her hand?!?! Oh wait! I see another gun concealed on top of her head!!! And look! the passenger has a gun on top of his head too!!!

---------- Post added at 07:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:33 PM ----------

7forever took his ball and went home. I guess he really is 7...forever. Fight or flight I guess.

 

[Kieran]

Crazy kooks posing simple denial of facts

The motorcade passes 4 people at the point that you say that Greer shoots JFK. Why hadn't any of them come forward to support your evidence? At least 2 of them would have been within 10 feet or so of the car at that point.

It's a crazy theory there is zero evidence so far to prove the gun theory. I don't think it exists anyway, the driver would not open fire, with so many people in the car as passengers, who could have easily identified him as a shooter later, well at least three would have noticed the gun even in the panic of it all, it's a fairly small space they were all in, and to shoot a gun so close to the front passengers left ear and head would be so dangerous and easily heard by people on the grass at that time. Trajectory of the bullet well it came from right side of the motorcade to me, but wasn't Oswald alleged to have fired down from a position of height, but it was position were he was looking forward, the car had passed it was not back or down below as bullets came in, so that is fairly conclusive of another shooter, unless Oswald was equipped with bullets that could a zig zag around and change course, he hardly had heat seeking bullets either lol Max Payne most of been in Dallas that day!