Sentry
Paranormal Adept
I just found my notes from reviewing on the Aztec case and looking over Jim Moseley's book as well as his notes for his unpublished 50s book. The top points:
1) In 1953, Newton and Scully attended the first flying saucer convention (even after being exposed by Cahn).
2) Mike Conrad, the filmmaker (that promoted his movie The Flying Saucer with phony claims that his film contained genuine saucer footage) knew Frank Scully.
3) Frank Scully was active or at least well informed about the saucer scene. He had planned a second saucer book about one of the contactees.
4) Silas Newton was aware of the other saucer stories being circulated and tried to use them to support his own claims. He also claimed to have accompanied GeBauer in an investigation of the scene of George Adamski's meeting with Orthon!
None of this proves that the Aztec case was true or false, but it demonstrates a high concentration of baloney among the story's original supporters. Good work, Jim!
1) In 1953, Newton and Scully attended the first flying saucer convention (even after being exposed by Cahn).
2) Mike Conrad, the filmmaker (that promoted his movie The Flying Saucer with phony claims that his film contained genuine saucer footage) knew Frank Scully.
3) Frank Scully was active or at least well informed about the saucer scene. He had planned a second saucer book about one of the contactees.
4) Silas Newton was aware of the other saucer stories being circulated and tried to use them to support his own claims. He also claimed to have accompanied GeBauer in an investigation of the scene of George Adamski's meeting with Orthon!
None of this proves that the Aztec case was true or false, but it demonstrates a high concentration of baloney among the story's original supporters. Good work, Jim!