Pat on the back, guys. Just finished listening.
The part where David was talking about the UFO's not obeying the "rules" of physics as we know them, and looking for clues as to what they are using for a propulsion system, brings to mind a case that almost certainly contains some clue. I don't remember the man's name...I only met him once and it was more than 10 years ago. He told me that he fired an anti-aircraft cannon at a 'disc' off the coast of Hawaii during WW2. He said you could see by the tracer rounds that the stream of fire was arcing around the object...not ricocheting, but going around it and then straightening back out! The guy seemed to be honest and sane. I don't know how to interpret this report, assuming it's a fact, but there must surely be some clue as to the physics involved.
Thanks!
Such testimony is indeed very interesting. The behaviour you describe would support the ideas I mentioned earlier (by Hill and others).
To quote from Dr Puthoff's review of Hill's book:
[SIZE=-1]
One of the consequences of the above identification of field propulsion type by Hill is his conclusion, supported by detailed calculation, computer simulation and wind-tunnel studies, that supersonic flight through the atmosphere without sonic booms is easily engineered. Manipulation of the acceleration-type force field would, even at supersonic speeds, result in a constant-pressure, compression-free zone without shockwave in which the vehicle is surrounded by a subsonic flow-pattern of streamlines, and subsonic velocity ratios. An additional benefit of such field control is that drops of moisture, rain, dust, insects, or other low-velocity objects would follow streamline paths around the craft rather than impact it.
[/SIZE]I was planning to look for old debriefings of WWII crews firing at "foo fighters" to see if they were reporting effects such as the one you just shared with us. If anyone has come across such material, please let me know.