• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Meteor Impact in Russia

Free episodes:

anyone see that film "Night of the Meteor"?
I think you're referring to "Night of the Comet (1984)".

Two pretty high school girls (one a cheerleader!) don't like their stepmother or her new boyfriend ("Daddy would have gotten us Uzis!"). One morning, they wake up to find that everybody in Los Angeles has been turned to dust by a Comet except them, a guy who looks like Erik Estrada, some zombies and the occupants of a secret underground government installation.

I'm surprised a movie studio hasn't done a remake on this one. It's got everything! Dumb hot girls, zombies, secret government installations and an Eric Estrada look alike!
 
Good catch boomerang !
When this news was breaking last night about 23:00 pst the newscast showed that name on a map and for some reason it resonated with me, but I couldn't put a finger on it at the time, leave it to a fellow paracaster to point this out.
 
This is sounding like a fairly significant impact (As far as meteorites go). It astounds me that the major news networks with their "supposed" 24 hour coverage have yet to report on this. Yet when Lindsay Lohan gets arrested and it's a bulletin within 15 minutes.
They will report the end of the world, about 2 minutes before it happens. :D
 
(personally I think the boom was caused by the secret Tunguska meteor-gun that motors up out of a lake once every hundred years and destroys a potentially fatal meteor, like this one!)

Well, exactly! And may Quantum Consciousness bless those ancient aliens for setting up their meteor combat dome array in Northern Asia in the middle of nowhere, so that from the safety of our western screens we can watch the show. Talk about mass devastation from the sky.
 
There was also one that passed by Northern California yesterday around 11:30am that was only 17,000 miles outside the atmosphere. It was so close that it was sucked in to Earth's gravitational pull. If it hit it could have been catastrophic.
 
yesterday i Posted that i felt that this was debris trailing the astriod that thought was fulfulled when several OTHER metors were seen coming in...
Feb 16 - It's Going Down! Meteors Seen Over California, Russia & Cuba

Meteor streams over San Francisco on heels of Russian meteor exploding - Hartford Top News | Examiner.com

Well, as a joke I was going to post this picture I took as I was walking to work yesterday (I live in la) & push it off as a meteorite. now having read vesve's post maybe the joke was on me :)

aju9y9a2.jpg


Speaking of pictures clouds appreciators thread, I have not forgotten you we have some catching.up to do.
 
Here is an interesting video. It claims that it was no meteor and that a UFO caused it to break up. Funny mad conspiracy? Maybe, but nonetheless it is very interesting. One of the pieces of footage clearly shows a solid object accelerating toward the 'meteor' on an exact matching trajectory, it collides with and splits the meteor, emerging out the front, apparently unchanged/undamaged itself, and it continues on...ahead of the main part it hit.

Now it may seem at first thought that it could just be part of this meteor or a companion one but when you think about it, that would be impossible almost.

For a start, to have the precise trajectory to enter the comet precisely from behind, whilst on the exact same flight path in 3-D space, it would have to have been part of the meteor prior to entry into our atmosphere. But if it was, how did it end up slower, to fall behind and then so much faster so that it could then accelerate and punch through the main part? Even a difference in wind resistance due to size and shape would not have as pronounced effect as is seen.

So if the object that smashes the meteor was not part of the actual meteor, what are the chances of two completely separate objects, entering our atmosphere on the exact same path, and the following object catching up?

Another thing is that if it was just a collision, there is such a small chance of the smaller object being undamaged and not being deviated from it's course whatsoever? We are thinking billiard balls in 3-D space, you know how it works in a game of pool etc.

I'm not saying that there is any spaceship etc but the behaviour of this piece that breaks the main part is just not random at all. One final thing, at least the way it looks in the video, the smaller object either just appears near the meteor tail, or it emerges from the tail, which would be highly impossible as it would have to have deviated it's course a fair bit - and how? Now I know lots of possible ways of moving could be caused by various collisions etc but that is just not what is shown in the video.

PLEASE make sure to watch some other footage of a supposed previous meteor entry, specifically starting at 11min 23seconds, there are two 'meteors' on a diverging flight path (they are pointed in different directions and definitely far from parallel).
They both go behind some clouds and when they reappear there is one 'meteor' going far, far faster, followed by TWO more who for all the world look like they are in formation and a formation that is directly following the front object. It almost looks like all three are connected physically. But how can that be from two who had different flight paths?
I suppose one could have split behind the clouds etc but that doesn't account for the increased speed or course-change?

Maybe I am seeing what I want or expect to, I am always willing to admit I've been wrong, but I am so, so sure that this is not standard ballistic behaviour. Humans are pretty darn good at spotting such things as over our whole lives all we ever see is forces and ballistic movements by the book, on earth, without interference, objects will always obey Newtons' laws and these ones have either done a quick-change behind the clouds or something more controlled is happening.

I anxiously await some opinions from anyone in the forum - it's part of why I come here, there are plenty intelligent, thoughtful people here and I truly respect many who participate here.


RUSSIAN METEOR WAS A UFO MOTHERSHIP: VIDEO PROOF! (and more) - YouTube
 
Here is an interesting video. It claims that it was no meteor and that a UFO caused it to break up. Funny mad conspiracy? Maybe, but nonetheless it is very interesting. One of the pieces of footage clearly shows a solid object accelerating toward the 'meteor' on an exact matching trajectory, it collides with and splits the meteor, emerging out the front, apparently unchanged/undamaged itself, and it continues on...ahead of the main part it hit.

Now it may seem at first thought that it could just be part of this meteor or a companion one but when you think about it, that would be impossible almost.

For a start, to have the precise trajectory to enter the comet precisely from behind, whilst on the exact same flight path in 3-D space, it would have to have been part of the meteor prior to entry into our atmosphere. But if it was, how did it end up slower, to fall behind and then so much faster so that it could then accelerate and punch through the main part? Even a difference in wind resistance due to size and shape would not have as pronounced effect as is seen.

So if the object that smashes the meteor was not part of the actual meteor, what are the chances of two completely separate objects, entering our atmosphere on the exact same path, and the following object catching up?

Another thing is that if it was just a collision, there is such a small chance of the smaller object being undamaged and not being deviated from it's course whatsoever? We are thinking billiard balls in 3-D space, you know how it works in a game of pool etc.

I'm not saying that there is any spaceship etc but the behaviour of this piece that breaks the main part is just not random at all. One final thing, at least the way it looks in the video, the smaller object either just appears near the meteor tail, or it emerges from the tail, which would be highly impossible as it would have to have deviated it's course a fair bit - and how? Now I know lots of possible ways of moving could be caused by various collisions etc but that is just not what is shown in the video.

PLEASE make sure to watch some other footage of a supposed previous meteor entry, specifically starting at 11min 23seconds, there are two 'meteors' on a diverging flight path (they are pointed in different directions and definitely far from parallel).
They both go behind some clouds and when they reappear there is one 'meteor' going far, far faster, followed by TWO more who for all the world look like they are in formation and a formation that is directly following the front object. It almost looks like all three are connected physically. But how can that be from two who had different flight paths?
I suppose one could have split behind the clouds etc but that doesn't account for the increased speed or course-change?

Maybe I am seeing what I want or expect to, I am always willing to admit I've been wrong, but I am so, so sure that this is not standard ballistic behaviour. Humans are pretty darn good at spotting such things as over our whole lives all we ever see is forces and ballistic movements by the book, on earth, without interference, objects will always obey Newtons' laws and these ones have either done a quick-change behind the clouds or something more controlled is happening.

I anxiously await some opinions from anyone in the forum - it's part of why I come here, there are plenty intelligent, thoughtful people here and I truly respect many who participate here.


RUSSIAN METEOR WAS A UFO MOTHERSHIP: VIDEO PROOF! (and more) - YouTube

Kind of baffled by this Goggs... Will think about it on my flight back home as I have just got off tour.
 
Something that this event made me think about: a meteorite like this is a rare event, more rarely reported that UFOs. However, this was caught on video by a lot of cameras. Why doesn't that happen with UFOs?
 
I would like to know why no one knew this russian meteor was coming.

Angelo I am surprised you haven't seen any UFO's caught on video. There are lots of them.
 
You're right, there are, but nothing captured this well and at so many different angles. That's the thing that bugs me. I'd guess that if a UFO was caught this well, it would not be a UFO for long because we would be able to see it was something more mundane.
 
Why doesn't that happen with UFOs?

It does, if you don't think of UFOs as disc-shaped metal vessels probably controlled by some non-human intelligence.

There is a nice Youtube channel called SeeingUFOsPA. Or you might try the Hessdalen project site, it has a download section.

Oh and there's a guy in Scotland I believe, who gets so many manoeuvering, zig-zagging "stars" that he thinks there's a war going on in space.

But of course, these are just some lights in the sky. Could be anything. :rolleyes:
 
Something that this event made me think about: a meteorite like this is a rare event, more rarely reported that UFOs. However, this was caught on video by a lot of cameras. Why doesn't that happen with UFOs?
I'm betting ufo's are being captured, just ignored or over looked.
The reason the Russkies have cameras is for protection from insurance fraud and crooked cops, not ufo image capture. They may not even notice or be aware of something strange in the sky unless it's like that exploding meteor.
Did you see the one video that perfectly captured the entire fireball from the dash point of view? The Russian driver never slowed or pulled over or even yelled "Святая корова!" (Holy Cow!)....he just kept on driving like nothing happened.
How shocked is someone like that going to be by a light in the sky, or a disc whizzing by?
 
Back
Top