He Who Shall Not Be Named? & The Billy Meier Contacts
I just want to point out again that ZTGR, again, has typed his head off and still has not responded to the issues (which he asked for) that I presented to him 2 pages ago. Seems he'd rather talk about me then to me.
Are you sure you arent He Who Shall Not Be Named??
I'd like to know what comparison was shown that made people chuckle, as there's never been a chuckle before when I showed this:
I'll bet this wasnt the comparison you got at He Who Shall Not Be Named?'s party of propagand...I mean lecture. Considering Meier's shows no real detail and mine shows a well structured craft...mine also doesnt have a warped hull like many of Meier's do. Take note mine is also shot in blue sky, not Meier's overcast days which are so good at hiding supportive strings. Mine is also not shot into the sun, nor attached to a tree. It's a painfully simple shot, and done with nothing but a camera, model and string.
If you cannot see the absolute similarites, (including that niether mine nor Meier's have *any* atmospheric distance haze) then there's no need for you to "feel" for me, as I feel much more for you. As far as I'm concerned, all his shot has over mine is a prettier backdrop. Both craft are in similar focus, the buildings behind are similar focus, and I personally believe the objects are approximately just as far away, perhaps Meier's a tad more distant then mine, not by very much though. The point was made, and like David said, it really doesnt prove anything but that I can duplicate fake photos.
You also need to realize that Meier's photos you see online are likely scans of lithograph prints or books, as thats all thats been available. This too obscures the judgement of the comparison, as mine is a direct scan. I duplicated the Meier photos as he asked. I find it amusing that when I did them even he said they were "very good", now, they arent.
It's not surprising as he talks out the other side of his face all the time. He also has some delusion he's "playing" us, when we talk about the case in message boards and such. The fact is, and anyone bothering to read it, is that we have the factual data and hard questions that he's refused to address...he's the only one looking like a fool. He can delude himself as much as he wants, it's all out there in black and white. And soon, there will be a major release of an information clearing house on this whole matter, so we can move on to more important work and just refer people with questions there.
As far as He Who Shall Not Be Named?'s mention of the police reports, as the US media representative he should have that data and he doesnt apparently, as he dropped like a stone from Victor's list after a weeklong flurry of emails. He stopped cold after that question. We're waiting, and others have also called him out on the list for it. No reply.
Of course you can reply to this, and address it and the other points made to you 2 pages ago, or youre going to ignore it and continue to say whatever you want. I dont personally care what you want to believe either, but if you want to argue points, make them. If you dont, then accept the fact you just want to believe more then you want to know.
I dunno, maybe you just want to be a sockpuppet for He Who Shall Not Be Named?.
I just want to point out again that ZTGR, again, has typed his head off and still has not responded to the issues (which he asked for) that I presented to him 2 pages ago. Seems he'd rather talk about me then to me.
Are you sure you arent He Who Shall Not Be Named??
I'd like to know what comparison was shown that made people chuckle, as there's never been a chuckle before when I showed this:
I'll bet this wasnt the comparison you got at He Who Shall Not Be Named?'s party of propagand...I mean lecture. Considering Meier's shows no real detail and mine shows a well structured craft...mine also doesnt have a warped hull like many of Meier's do. Take note mine is also shot in blue sky, not Meier's overcast days which are so good at hiding supportive strings. Mine is also not shot into the sun, nor attached to a tree. It's a painfully simple shot, and done with nothing but a camera, model and string.
If you cannot see the absolute similarites, (including that niether mine nor Meier's have *any* atmospheric distance haze) then there's no need for you to "feel" for me, as I feel much more for you. As far as I'm concerned, all his shot has over mine is a prettier backdrop. Both craft are in similar focus, the buildings behind are similar focus, and I personally believe the objects are approximately just as far away, perhaps Meier's a tad more distant then mine, not by very much though. The point was made, and like David said, it really doesnt prove anything but that I can duplicate fake photos.
You also need to realize that Meier's photos you see online are likely scans of lithograph prints or books, as thats all thats been available. This too obscures the judgement of the comparison, as mine is a direct scan. I duplicated the Meier photos as he asked. I find it amusing that when I did them even he said they were "very good", now, they arent.
It's not surprising as he talks out the other side of his face all the time. He also has some delusion he's "playing" us, when we talk about the case in message boards and such. The fact is, and anyone bothering to read it, is that we have the factual data and hard questions that he's refused to address...he's the only one looking like a fool. He can delude himself as much as he wants, it's all out there in black and white. And soon, there will be a major release of an information clearing house on this whole matter, so we can move on to more important work and just refer people with questions there.
As far as He Who Shall Not Be Named?'s mention of the police reports, as the US media representative he should have that data and he doesnt apparently, as he dropped like a stone from Victor's list after a weeklong flurry of emails. He stopped cold after that question. We're waiting, and others have also called him out on the list for it. No reply.
Of course you can reply to this, and address it and the other points made to you 2 pages ago, or youre going to ignore it and continue to say whatever you want. I dont personally care what you want to believe either, but if you want to argue points, make them. If you dont, then accept the fact you just want to believe more then you want to know.
I dunno, maybe you just want to be a sockpuppet for He Who Shall Not Be Named?.