P
Paul Kimball
Guest
Now folks, let's keep it civil... I would hate to have to use my new moderator powers.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Speaking of childish. Do you often ask random questions to people who aren't involved in the conversation? I assume you have some kind of disturbed fascination with me because you try your hardest to get my attention. Man love maybe. Who knows. I don't judge.
First we have your false assumption and now you're seeking an answer from someone who simply isn't involved.
Now, I already answered your question. I said it was either fairy dust, aliens or the weight of Alex Jones' contrived bullshit. I'm open to other suggestions: Gnomes, dragons, pixies etc etc.
Again, consumption of tinfoil is not recommended as a dietary supplement. Try something with a little more fibre.
there is NO WAY a cold office fire can "sit and cook for weeks" and go from 700 degrees to 2800 degrees. AND btw- molten IRON is not HARDENED STRUCTURAL STEEL.
Actually no analysis was done of the molten material so the composition of it is unknown. To call it "iron" or "steel" goes beyond the facts. Of course to call the fires resulting from a huge building collapse after being struck by an airliner, an "office fire" is not exactly what one might call reasonable either.
Actually no analysis was done of the molten material so the composition of it is unknown. To call it "iron" or "steel" goes beyond the facts. Of course to call the fires resulting from a huge building collapse after being struck by an airliner, an "office fire" is not exactly what one might call reasonable either.
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]1.3 TEMPERATURES DURING BUILDING FIRES[/FONT]
<TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2 border=1><TBODY><TR><TD class=Normal vAlign=top>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Hot gas layer[/FONT]
</TD><TD class=Normal vAlign=top></TD></TR><TR><TD class=Normal vAlign=top>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Floor temperature[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]600°-1000°[/FONT]
</TD><TD class=Normal vAlign=top></TD></TR><TR><TD class=Normal vAlign=top>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Glowing smoldering combustion[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]>180°[/FONT]
</TD><TD class=Normal vAlign=top></TD></TR><TR><TD class=Normal vAlign=top>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Flashover[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]to 600°[/FONT]
</TD><TD class=Normal vAlign=top></TD></TR><TR><TD class=Normal vAlign=top>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Glowing coals[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]>600°[/FONT]
</TD><TD class=Normal vAlign=top></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]to 1300°[/FONT]
Thank you.
Before we call it "molten steel" or even think that the molten metal was still molten when it was found we need to have evidence. There was ZERO credible evidence that the metal was still liquid when it was found, nor evidence as to the composition of the metal itself.
As far as temperatures in an office fire...or a structural fire go...I found an interesting page:
http://www.tcforensic.com.au/docs/article10.html#2.1.2
So yes, the temperature may have been only 700* F but at times it could have been as high as 1300* in some parts.
1300 is not hot enough to melt steel or keep it molten for a few weeks. there is plenty of video, photo and eye witness evidence of molten metal.
you get paid to be here don't you?
Yes, unfortunately the molten metal reports are only anecdotal. At the time, it wasn't appreciated that conspiracists find anything they can to hang their demented ideas upon. No one knew that the crazy thermite theory would be created. I suspect that finding such metal was not even surprising to those used to working in such conditions (the testimony above seem to support that).
And just to expand upon Jose's above post--there is no official claim of "molten steel" the temps were likely NOT hot enough for that. The temps WERE hot enough to compromise the strength of the steel.
The conspiracy nuts continue crawling out of the woodwork.
Jose there is nothing wrong with seeking the truth.
What is wrong is criticizing people who want answers to things they don't feel make sense.
I think we still have to ask the question of how these buildings came down at free fall speed as we all saw. It is impossible for a 110 story building to come down and end up in a neat pile of rubble unless some sort of controlled demolition was used.
Even if the heat did reach temps that could melt steel, these temps would have only been reached at the point of impact. What about the other 100 floors?
If they came down because of the pancake theory like we are told in the official story, they don't come down at free fall speed.
Jose there is nothing wrong with seeking the truth.
What is wrong is criticizing people who want answers to things they don't feel make sense.
It is impossible for a 110 story building to come down and end up in a neat pile of rubble unless some sort of controlled demolition was used.
Even if the heat did reach temps that could melt steel, these temps would have only been reached at the point of impact. What about the other 100 floors?
If they came down because of the pancake theory like we are told in the official story, they don't come down at free fall speed.