NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
207 posts and counting, we need to give this dude some kind of award. isuggest we club together and buy him this;
Amazon.com: Official Adobe Photoshop 2.0 (9780679790242): David Biedny, Bert Monroy: Books
Hi there,
I recently listened to the two shows with Nancy Talbot. I found the first show very interesting as the people that Nancy said found some real anomalies in her samples seem to be much credited in their professional fields (but as for the Imbrogno's case that should be taken with caution)
I think it was a good idea to bring RVDB and his friend Stan for another show. As for Stan being a mentalist and well versed in computers (as others on the forum pointed out), I personnally think that what Nancy, RVDB and Stan claim is so incredible, that RVDB and Stan are frauds and that Nancy, too committed in to stand back, has been fooled.
Another thing that is illogic in RVDB'story and makes me think that way is that he said his experiences have a family background. If that's the case, why then his parents wouldn't believe his experiences when he was a child and place him in a mental institute? They sure wouldn't do this if they had similar experiences and knew their son was not crazy.
I don't think this by itself should necesseraly impact on Nancy's BLT and crop-circles research...It's too bad for fer that she believes so strongly in RVDB and Stan's claims that she can't think of the possibility that they are frauds.
It's interesting to contrast the first show with Nancy Talbot with the second. When she was discussing her crop circle research, she seemed rational. When it came to RVDB, she seemed to lose any ability to think critically. Two things appear obvious to me after listening to the second show carefully again. One, Nancy experienced some events with RVDB that "blew her mind", and two, she's been charmed by RVDB and is, in a sense, blinded by "love". I believe she is an honest person, just as I believe that Robert is a charlatan and a sociopath. Nancy appears to be a person who is naive about how easy it is to trick the human mind and create incredible illusions.
I remember one time at a friends' wedding reception I performed a few simple mentalist tricks. Most at the table were entertained and somewhat shocked, but accepted that it was some kind of psychological manipulation. One guy at the table, however, followed me around for the rest of the night, convinced that I could read minds -- it almost seemed like he was ready to form a cult around me. It took a long time for me to convince him that I had no such abilities, and I felt like he was never quite convinced. I remember in college, I went to a show by the amazing Kreskin -- he hypnotized one of my friends and told him that he would not be able to see one of his assistants, and then had that assistant carry a chair around the stage. Nothing I said after the show could convince my friend that Kreskin didn't have powers of telekinesis.
It's interesting to contrast the first show with Nancy Talbot with the second. When she was discussing her crop circle research, she seemed rational. When it came to RVDB, she seemed to lose any ability to think critically. Two things appear obvious to me after listening to the second show carefully again. One, Nancy experienced some events with RVDB that "blew her mind", and two, she's been charmed by RVDB and is, in a sense, blinded by "love". I believe she is an honest person, just as I believe that Robert is a charlatan and a sociopath. Nancy appears to be a person who is naive about how easy it is to trick the human mind and create incredible illusions. I remember one time at a friends' wedding reception I performed a few simple mentalist tricks. Most at the table were entertained and somewhat shocked, but accepted that it was some kind of psychological manipulation. One guy at the table, however, followed me around for the rest of the night, convinced that I could read minds -- it almost seemed like he was ready to form a cult around me. It took a long time for me to convince him that I had no such abilities, and I felt like he was never quite convinced. I remember in college, I went to a show by the amazing Kreskin -- he hypnotized one of my friends and told him that he would not be able to see one of his assistants, and then had that assistant carry a chair around the stage. Nothing I said after the show could convince my friend that Kreskin didn't have powers of telekinesis.
so put the 40 ounce down and ffs get with the programme grandma your not making sense dammit!Brown a mentalist? Myabe, maybe not. Illusionist. Yes. Disillusionist? Absolutely. Nicely wraps interesting acts and results with complete disillusions, fakery and stunting.
Good entertainment but as paranormal as a snneze.
a mentalist is from "mentalism" its a form of trickery that uses a combination of psychology, nlp, suggestion, hypnotism, showmanship and slight of hand. he makes a point of claiming that there what he does is not paranormal. as in the fucking video.
so put the 40 ounce down and ffs get with the the programme grandad your not making sense dammit!
So to add to the endless confusion, some character posted a review of The Paracast over at iTunes suggesting I asked too many questions, that I should have just let Talbott and van den Broeke filibuster and let the listeners decide. Of course, they've already done that elsewhere; it was time we held their feet to the fire.
i still dont understand what your talking about. your not making sense.S
Sure. Derren Brown is a fucking, proven fraud. Understand, kiddie?
Brown a mentalist? Myabe, maybe not. Illusionist. Yes. Disillusionist? Absolutely. Nicely wraps interesting acts and results with complete disillusions, fakery and stunting.
Good entertainment but as paranormal as a snneze.