• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

New Evidence Could Prove That The Billy Meier UFO Case Is Real !

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.

ufo junky

Paranormal Novice
3554042268_11259d6983_o.jpg

I have been researching the Billy Meier UFO case for over 6 years now, trying to prove whether the case is just simply a hoax, or whether there is any truth in Billy Meier’s claims. I have always tended to support the hoax theory and my reasons and research can all be found at- www.youtube.com/user/billymeierhoax

As a Billy Meier researcher and a person with an interest in the UFO subject, I feel it is my duty to put forward into the public domain any new research I am sent or any new research I come across myself, as long as it is reasonably credible, and to let people make up their own minds.

Over the last few days I have sat and talked with a woman for many hours and listened and discussed what she had to say, and I have to say, at times it was very moving and emotional. If this woman was just any old Tom, Dick or Harry of the street, then I probably would not have even given her the time of day, but because she is someone who I have known for many, many years I decided to listen to what she had to say. This woman wishes to remain anonymous, she has no interest in the UFO subject, she is not the sort of person to go running to some kind of media format looking for attention, and I can clearly state that she is of sound mind and is a very credible individual. Over the last few days this woman told me an incredible story, what follows is what she told me. I will call her Juliet for argument sake. Juliet’s experience happened in the autumn of 2009, it is only now that she has spoken to anyone about it, she actually told me that she was going to throw her evidence away and never speak another word of it!!!!

Juliet told me that she was just out and about minding her own business when she spotted a circular shaped object high up in the sky, she said that the object was rather distant and blinked out after several seconds. Juliet told me that several seconds later, an extremely large, metallic flying saucer shaped craft suddenly appeared right in front of her, she said that the craft was enormous, completely silent and it hovered very slightly over the roof of a large house.

Juliet said that she could not believe what she was seeing; she told me that she began to feel ill; she said that she started to feel funny, dry mouth, beating heart, sweaty palms; she said that she actually thought that she was either dying or having a mental breakdown. Juliet calmly reached for her mobile phone and started to film the flying saucer, sadly after 30 seconds the film clip was automatically saved and the phone flashed “Low Battery”. Juliet quickly went back into the camera settings and luckily the camera started recording again, only this time the saucer was now hovering directly behind the roof of the house. Again after 30 seconds the film clip was automatically saved and the phone switched itself of, Juliet explained that she was lucky enough to zoom in on the craft in the second clip before the phone shut down, Juliet’s explanation for this was that she had not charged her mobile phone up for several days, let that be a lesson to all of us!!!

Juliet told me that after filming the craft she stood and observed it for about a further 20 seconds before a very frightening thing happened to her. She told me that she was suddenly frozen, paralyzed, she said that she could not move a millimetre, Juliet said that she actually thought that she was suffering from some sort of seizure or stroke, she said it was very frightening. Juliet told me that she suddenly heard a very loud telepathic voice inside of her head, which said “We reveal ourselves to you today just to prove that we do exist and are real, Billy is not a liar”. Suddenly the whole experience was over explained Juliet, the craft was gone, she felt completely normal and it almost felt like it never happened, said Juliet.

Now I can imagine that most people will say “That’s one hell of a claim”?
I did too, but incredible claims require incredible evidence, and I have to say that Juliet’s evidence is incredible. When you watch the first film clip you would probably say that it could be done with a small model, it’s only when you view the second clip that you realise just how big the craft actually is, and anyone can clearly see that the Flying Saucer is clearly hovering behind the roof and is partially obscured by the roof of the house, proving that what you are observing in the footage is not a small model, but an extremely large object. You can also clearly see that the craft is not just similar to crafts that Billy Meier has filmed and photographed, but it is almost identical?

I asked Juliet why she is telling me this and what she expects me to do with her evidence? Juliet said that it is pretty clear that the plejerans are a real living extraterrestrial species, and she thinks that they chose to reveal themselves to her because they knew that she would speak to me about her experience, and because they know that I trust her. I have to say, does rather make sense to me, that’s if it is true, of course? She told me to either destroy the original files and forget that this conversation ever took place, or do the right thing and show people that Billy Meier is not a liar.

Well taking everything into consideration, does this mean that the Billy Meier case is real??? I wouldn’t go that far just yet, however, I do think that Juliet is a credible person and I do also think that her evidence is among some of the best UFO footage I have ever seen, especially the second clip. As someone who has worked with small models for many years, I can’t see how someone could fake something like that with a small model, maybe you could do it with a 50 foot model and an industrial crane, but that would cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds, maybe even millions??? And I find it very fascinating that the craft is identical to UFO’S that Meier has captured on camera! I would just like to make it clear; Juliet has no money and is not a skilled model maker, and is certainly not a liar or an attention seeker.

So there we have it, there is not really much else that I can say. I had two options, either sit on the evidence and say nothing, or release it into the public domain for scrutiny; I chose to release it as I feel it is my responsibility to share all UFO evidence with the UFO community, no matter how controversial it may be. I would like to say, I suspect that many people will have an opinion on this new evidence, that’s fine and is to be expected, all I will say is, please DON’T shoot the messenger.

Over the weekend I had a UFO researcher take a look at the film clips and I asked him for his opinion. Late Sunday evening he telephoned me, and speaking of the record he said this, “I ran both the film clips through several computer analysis programs and digital filters, I can tell you 100% that both clips are genuine mobile phone clips and have not been manipulated in any way, the pixilation and frames are untouched. When dealing with UFO footage one can never rule out the possibility of a deliberate hoax, however, if the film clips show a model then it must be a very huge model, something roughly the size of a small truck, to replicate this evidence with a small and tiny model close to the camera lens would simply be impossible.” He told me he is having some photographic experts look at it this week and will give me an update.

Is Billy Meier telling the truth, are the plejerans a real, breathing living extraterrestrial species which visit human beings, should we take a closer look at the Billy Meier UFO case and perhaps listen to what Billy has to say??? This is something you will have to answer for yourself, me personally, I have decided to take a fresh and closer look at the claims of Billy Meier before making any final judgment!

All photography and film clips Photo Copyright 2010 Anthony Wharton-Not to be used without permission.

Anthony Wharton, ST-Helens, Merseyside, UK, June 28TH 2010.

Here's the video:


<EMBED height=505 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=640 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/lJVwoJsr63A&hl=en_GB&fs=1?rel=0 allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>
</EMBED>
 
To improve the strength of your case you probably should have an independent, credible UFO investigator come in and confirm the account (someone like Nick Pope?), including providing reasonable access to Juliet. That independent investigator should probably also help coordinate the review of the video by an independent, reputable film technician, who is likewise willing to go on the record with his identity and formal findings.
 
How in fuck's sake does this case keep coming up? This case and the cult guru Meier are 100% frauds.

There is no reason to re-visit the case. There is no reason to keep investigating. There is no reason for the case to be brought up ever again, except as an educational tool to show how to detect a fraud.


Edited to add:

Just because I couldn't watch the "video" at work, I decided to watch it here at home. I'm glad I did because I really needed a laugh.

It's obvious that it's a fake just on casual observation, but in case anyone needs it pointed out:

Shadow on the "craft" is facing the light source.

The only thing moving in the video is the camera.


I'm not an expert in image manipulation or anything of the sort, which makes it UNBELIEVABLE that anyone with any common sense could miss those two items which scream "I AM A HOAX!"
 
To improve the strength of your case you probably should have an independent, credible UFO investigator come in and confirm the account (someone like Nick Pope?), including providing reasonable access to Juliet. That independent investigator should probably also help coordinate the review of the video by an independent, reputable film technician, who is likewise willing to go on the record with his identity and formal findings.

Except that Pope wouldn't touch this shit. Its so obviously fake that any analysis would be a waste of time and effort.
 
Except that Pope wouldn't touch this shit. Its so obviously fake that any analysis would be a waste of time and effort.

Nick Pope, or another credible researcher, probably would not want to get involved . . . . but does that mean you have be nasty to the original poster? If you believe "ufo junky" is a fraud, just ignore him.
 
@ufo junky - you've put this here just to be funny right? If not, you're posting B.M stuff in the wrong forum. Please let us know if you're being serious so that we can clearly explain to you why this stuff is complete garbage.

A
 
Nick Pope, or another credible researcher, probably would not want to get involved . . . . but does that mean you have be nasty to the original poster? If you believe "ufo junky" is a fraud, just ignore him.

I agree with you Tom. But if the guy is going to post Billy Meier stuff here, and he is claiming Billy Meier could be the real deal. Well then, I speaking for myself. Would expect our Friend to be prepared to fight his corner, and debate the evidence he alleged he has found. I don't think he will return for a while, just my opinion!!
 
Nick Pope, or another credible researcher, probably would not want to get involved . . . . but does that mean you have be nasty to the original poster? If you believe "ufo junky" is a fraud, just ignore him.

Sorry, I wasn't intentionally trying to be nasty. Just my absolute disdain for the Meier stuff leaking through.
 
This is my first post on these forums, I hope it does not come across as an attack. I felt that I had to say something about this post: in case ufo junky was not joking which i believe he is not. Here are my problems with the post in no particular order
(1) to quote ufo junky "and she thinks that they chose to reveal themselves to her because they knew that she would speak to me about her experience, and because they know that I trust her" ? why didnt they just contact you?
(2) another quote from ufo junky "This woman wishes to remain anonymous, she has no interest in the UFO subject," versus "Juliet told me that she suddenly heard a very loud telepathic voice inside of her head, which said “We reveal ourselves to you today just to prove that we do exist and are real, Billy is not a liar”." if she had no interest in ufos then how would she know of Billy meier?.
(3) ufo junky quote again "I have been researching the Billy Meier UFO case for over 6 years now," versus "I have decided to take a fresh and closer look at the claims of Billy Meier before making any final judgment!" what have you been doing for six years?
(4) there are supposed to be 2 video clips why did you combine them? also what was the original format of said videos? and what was the model and manufacturer of the mobile phone?
(5) Billy Meier's ex wife admited that it was all a hoax in 1999.
(6) im puzzled by this one "If this woman was just any old Tom, Dick or Harry of the street," do you mean OFF the street or of the street? quite different things :)
(7) as you have admited to studying the meier case for six years (5 years after Meier's wife confessed the truth) and also say that you have a working knowledge of minatures/models like Billy Meier i propose you made the film your self and concocted this witness from thin air i.e. she doesnt exist, also you can hire a crane with operator for alot less than a million quid (pounds) if you really want to persue the "it cant be minature" path!
(8) last quote i promise :) "
As a Billy Meier researcher and a person with an interest in the UFO subject, I feel it is my duty to put forward into the public domain any new research I am sent or any new research I come across myself, as long as it is reasonably credible, and to let people make up their own minds. versus "She told me to either destroy the original files and forget that this conversation ever took place, or do the right thing and show people that Billy Meier is not a liar." well he is a proven liar just ask his wife etc.
(9) should have been number one BILLY MEIER IS COCKNEY RHYMING SLANG FOR LIAR. :)
thanks for reading all sorry to make it so long aloha :)
 
I agree with you Tom. But if the guy is going to post Billy Meier stuff here, and he is claiming Billy Meier could be the real deal. Well then, I speaking for myself. Would expect our Friend to be prepared to fight his corner, and debate the evidence he alleged he has found. I don't think he will return for a while, just my opinion!!

Kieran, I agree, but there are different ways to approach this. Either we can: (i) send him away and tell him to do his homework, which effectively means we don't believe what he is saying is genuine, or (ii) verbally attack him and his post. Given Meier's credibility, I understand why people will want to throw tomatoes at him, but I suspect that is exactly the reaction that he wants to evoke. There is also the off-chance that he is a somewhat naive newcomer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top