• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

New Evidence Could Prove That The Billy Meier UFO Case Is Real !

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently this bloke has said that the Chicago O'Hare incident was a hoax (!!). I think he might just be a wee tad flakey. Tomorrow he'll probably say that the Meier stuff is a hoax again.

Actually reading some other stuff he says that he hoaxed some of the reported Chicago O'Hare pics as a social experiment which tries to show that photographic evidence is not wholey reliable ... uuuhhh ... hellooooo ... we all know that already.

I think he's just out there trying to stir up trouble. Although if he had the nachos ... sorry ... cahones to come back here and debate us maybe we would find out more. My hunch is that he won't.
 
I think he's just out there trying to stir up trouble. Although if he had the nachos ... sorry ... cahones to come back here and debate us maybe we would find out more. My hunch is that he won't.

Hmmm, feeding trolls just makes them multiply. Many of us here lived through the first Meier melee in the forums and emerged somewhat dumber for having taken part in it. If it was overly harsh it is because that time was so frustratingly bad that this particular subject matter is basically permanently non grata.
 
ufo junky, if you are still around... I am also a contactee claimant, although not of Meier's caliber, I guess one has to start small... Would you like to study my case ?
 
Did anyone get the fact that this individual is trying to pass themselves off as Tony Wharton?

I didn't but you're probably right :D ... its so difficult to tell sometimes. I have to take it on trust that the person posting is the same person as the poster says he/she is ... and then ... say something really dumb ... put my foot in it big time :D.

I say we just ignore any posts to do with Meier from now on. At least it will mean that I don't have to spend five minutes trying to get Meier spelt correctly :cool:... now ... on with more important things.
 
Who is Tony Wharton? I thought Anthony Wharton AKA UFO Junky was the person who wrote the post.
 
hi again just to say that "Tony" is the shortened name for "Anthony" in response to "Who is Tony Wharton? I thought Anthony Wharton AKA UFO Junky was the person who wrote the post"and also that if you check UFO junkys profile he joined this forum over 2 years ago has made 6 posts 5 of which are anti Meier and by his own admission has been studying the Meier case/hoax for 6 years so there is no possiblity that he is a newcomer: to quote Tom from hong kong "There is also the off-chance that he is a somewhat naive newcomer." I have also just checked the posts he has made, and found one where he refers to himself as "tony" here is the link Billy Meier-??? and in other posts he says how easy it is to replicate the Meier pictures/videos and did so himself The Wedding Cake UFO-Easily Replicated!!!!. I can only draw 2 conclusions (1)his account has been tampered with or (2)he is experiencing so personal difficulties.

Dear Anthony/ufo junky I know we do not know each other but if I can help you in any way or you just need some one to talk to PM me.
Aloha han
 
Dear Anthony/ufo junky I know we do not know each other but if I can help you in any way or you just need some one to talk to PM me.
Aloha han

Or if you need a new case to turn the page over the 6 years you have lost studying one of the dumbest case in history of ufology, you can count on me...
Well, I've still got two arms and THEY haven't invited me in THEIR spaceship yet, but I'm sure we can cook up something...
 
Just let me say this.........I have recently received several emails from the paracast.com people saying just how much we miss you on the forum.......please come onto the forum..........Well maybe I shouldn't have bothered???

Look, I also think the evidence is kooky..........I posted it here and on youtube to be nothing more than fair to Horn and Meier. Even they want to debunk it, saying that billy has been told by the plejarans that it wasn't them and they dont speak telepathically to people??? They just dont simply want anyone else to come within a 1000 miles of their rubbish.

If you are going to attack anything........at least try to replicate it first before attacking it...............the craft actually moves.........slightly............so does the trees.........and people can be seen walking around inside the house.

What ever your thoughts are.................it's at least interesting.........................shadow on the craft is caused by several extremely large conifer trees which are just out of shot???? That's what Juliet said!

And if it is an obvious hoax............then just goes to show how easy it is to replicate Meier's nonsense, despite what Horn tells people. Maybe that was the angle I was coming from.......think about it...........think about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, maybe Juliet is nothing more than a figment of my imagination??????????? Maybe I am writing this post from inside my padded cell??? who knows??????

www.flickr.com/photos/thesecretsofthesaucers

:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p

Take A Listen To My Talk..........

<EMBED height=505 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=640 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/6-A489nGS4w&hl=en_GB&fs=1?rel=0 allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></EMBED>
 
photoshop_book.jpg

Here's the video:


<EMBED height=505 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=640 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/lJVwoJsr63A&hl=en_GB&fs=1?rel=0 allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></EMBED>
</EMBED>

If you want someone to believe your story, or better yet, even READ it, you should probably have "better" evidence that it's not a hoax. All of your credibility, albeit very little, was thrown out the window by showing that gawd aweful video clip. Bogus, and Boring. Good luck Panhandling the rest of your story.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 PM ----------

If you are going to attack anything........at least try to replicate it first before attacking it...............the craft actually moves.........slightly............so does the trees.........and people can be seen walking around inside the house.

What ever your thoughts are.................it's at least interesting.........................shadow on the craft is caused by several extremely large conifer trees which are just out of shot???? That's what Juliet said!

your shadows casting from the trees is a lie. Look at the way the shadows are being cast on the house. Sun is to the left casting shadows to the right. On the alleged Craft the sun is shining from the right casting shadows on the left side of the craft. What a bunch of crap!
 
I suppose Gene could invite Tony to the show and get him to either

(1) Verify the comments under ufojunky are his and if not
(2) Ban the member for impersonating another individual (a perfectly reasonable action).
 
I suppose Gene could invite Tony to the show and get him to either

(1) Verify the comments under ufojunky are his and if not
(2) Ban the member for impersonating another individual (a perfectly reasonable action).

I'd need to examine option 2 more carefully. Option 1 is not in the cards.
 
dear ufo junky
conifer? altho not always an evergreen species they have needles as opposed to leaves, so why are there brown leaves on the trees in the video? also they grow in conical form i.e MIT-snapshot.jpg not like the oak trees which grow like this Crosby.jpg so in my mind "juliet" cant identify a tree any more than you can identify an obvious hoax!

lastly why did you not post the videos seperatley and un-edited?

p.s I have wasted too much time on this. Maybe people are correct when they say people will believe what they want to believe. I am trully sorry if you do and I am asking you not to
peace and love han
 
If you want someone to believe your story, or better yet, even READ it, you should probably have "better" evidence that it's not a hoax. All of your credibility, albeit very little, was thrown out the window by showing that gawd aweful video clip. Bogus, and Boring. Good luck Panhandling the rest of your story.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 PM ----------

your shadows casting from the trees is a lie. Look at the way the shadows are being cast on the house. Sun is to the left casting shadows to the right. On the alleged Craft the sun is shining from the right casting shadows on the left side of the craft. What a bunch of crap!

Gumbo76 is right about the shadows...

Anyway my brain doesn't run on a primitive Pentium, my eyes are not a pair of webcams and I don't need a picture analysis software to see that this object is around a foot in diameter and is appearing bigger because it is close to the camera.

So ufo junky, either you think we are retarded or you are seriously retarded...

Ron and Angel, I know you took the Mod job only 24hrs ago but what about giving your first ban for this one ? Just a thought, you rule ...8)
 
The poster is an obvious troll -- he isn't the real Tony Wharton and therefore is simply impersonating. He took the image off google images (just google Anthony Wharton and you'll find the seedy glasses pic in the top 20.)

If I am wrong...well...then someone needs to take a few lessons in authenticity.
 
And if it is an obvious hoax............then just goes to show how easy it is to replicate Meier's nonsense, despite what Horn tells people. Maybe that was the angle I was coming from.......think about it...........think about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

UFO Junky, quit playing games. You obviously don't need to convince anyone on this Forum that the Meier material is bogus. Having ostensibly been a member of the Forum for several years, and having posted on the Meier topic previously, you should be well aware of that. And, if you happen to be impersonating another individual, then you deserve to be banned permanently. Frankly, all of us have to deal with enough jokers in our everyday lives without having to deal with another on this message board.
 
I googled the name "ufo junky" and came up with a flickr (photo sharing website) account linked here: Flickr: ufo junky's Photostream aswell as an account on the website "unexplained mysteries" Search Form - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums
I also googled anthony wharton and ufo junky together and found that you get the same result. I do not beleive that "ufo junky" is an impersonator as at all times he has gone to great lengths to label all his uploaded photos/videos on all sites as "copyright Anthony Wharton" going back as far as 2008. there is also a continuity to what he says in all these places, i.e. in 2008/9 he is making posts stating the billy meier case is a hoax and easily replicated untill his apparent U-turn. so to my mind they are the same person of course i could be wrong too

WILL THE REAL ANTHONY WHARTON PLEASE STAND UP! lol :)
Aloha han
 
FAKE so fake its not funny! more fake then Reeds alien. I could do better! i found myself looking for the wires....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top