• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Phoenix Lights A Hoax Just Like '97

Free episodes:

blindethos said:
Not one single close up, daylight piece of video of a single UFO.

What's your point? Show me a video of a meteor actually hitting the earth. Damn few (if any videos) but it still happens ---- lots.

blindethos said:
Someone releases wedding lights and everyone thinks about little green men.

Not everyone.

blindethos said:
Utter nonsense.

Maybe.

But everybody who has taken the time to study the phenomenon seriously (that I know of) has walked away at least puzzled.

In my own mind, it's not even a matter of *whether* a phenomenon exists but what is it?

But I would certainly agree that "utter nonsense" permeates this topic.
 
Let's expand on captain moron's tea light, or wedding light theory.

In order for Captain Moron to be right about his nonsense, the following would have to be true.

1. There could be NO WIND what so ever. The objects sit stationary how long?
2. The wire used to tether the lights together would have to be rigid, so as to not allow the lights to sway back and forth. That's even without wind.
3. The Wire would have to defy the laws of physics, as it would pull the lights diagonally to the ground.
4. The wire in of itself, would leave evidence behind the second that the helium left the balloons, or the flares burned them.
5. The fact that the lights turn on by themselves, also means there would have be some kind of remote device to light them, or if there were wires to do so, they too would also leave traces behind.

We're talking an inordinate amount of wire, or string, and balloons that would be easily found the next day.

This blindethos person must be James McGaha. That's the only other person I can think of off the top of my head with this level of idiocy.
 
blindethos said:
Not one single close up, daylight piece of video of a single UFO.
Not one single close up, piece of video showing wedding lights and wire and remotely controlled lights. Sorry,.. candles.

blindethos said:
Someone releases wedding lights and everyone thinks about little green men. Utter nonsense.
Proclamation doesn't get you anywhere but further from the truth.

It is also utter nonsense that everyone thinks of little green men. The question is ,what is it? What was the thing that passed over Phoenix and other areas hours before you released your wedding lights?? Just show us the video so we can see it done. Otherwise your argument is completely useless. And I'm just guessing you're not going to offer anything except unsubstantiated proclamations.

Carry on you clever debunker.
 
The guy who claimed he did it with helium balloons and flares apparently forgot that flares would light up the underside of the balloon.

Then there's the whole how did the lights turn on by themselves, and of course the wire...

But again... I'm hoping that blindethos (HA, What a name...) will document his attempt at replicating the event.
 
Tommy Allison said:
The guy who claimed he did it with helium balloons and flares apparently forgot that flares would light up the underside of the balloon.

Then there's the whole how did the lights turn on by themselves, and of course the wire...

But again... I'm hoping that blindethos (HA, What a name...) will document his attempt at replicating the event.

Despite the questions from this alleged confession, it'll go down as a hoax pure and simple. That's just how things are, although I hope more meaningful evidence is found.
 
You're right. It will remain a hoax until a ship that size actually crashes into Phoenix. Even then, people like BlindEthos will denounce it as a hoax.
 
I'll mention that we need to differentiate between the lights filmed later in the evening (which do seem to have been sourced from the military, perhaps as a diversion), and the massive moving craft seen earlier in the evening, which was not one of ours.

dB
 
Tommy Allison said:
This blindethos person must be James McGaha. That's the only other person I can think of off the top of my head with this level of idiocy.

I think I get it now. Blindethos is Anonymous22, or for a bit, ETHypothesisisJUNK until that was banned.

Check out those posts. He was banned, but is back somehow and has now has toned it down a bit, well, ... sort of. (Different computer or Dave and Gene let him come back) Same repeating stuff in numerous threads which I guessed would happen. Wait for it, soon we'll hear the gospel of psycho-social phenomenon, or military ops and Betty Hill.

Hmmmm, there it is.
"Betty Hill's case was a total psy-op. It's almost laughable."
"Betty Hill starmap. Seriously folks. Come on. "
"UFO's could be just a psychological phenomenon."
Etc, etc, etc

Why would someone who KNOWS what is happening even bother with us morons?? Oh well.
Sorry if I'm wrong here, maybe it is his brother or something.
 
blindethos said:
Not one single close up, daylight piece of video of a single UFO. Someone releases wedding lights and everyone thinks about little green men. Utter nonsense.

Saying "everyone thinks about little green men", is non-sense.
 
Back
Top