NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
If I wanted to smoke dope, I would have voted the Green Party.
I guess the alternative would be to create another thread with the same name so if people are interested in anything prior they would have to go to a whole other thread. For some reason that just doesn't make sense to me. I always look for existing threads with the same names before creating a new one. Like why create 29 new Bigfoot threads. That seems more like something for the mods should discourage.You're responding to people who haven't been on the forums for years. The post you responded to was 10 years old. You can think Randall for posting a new post in a dead thread. In the Astronomy forum, you would get banned for doing that
should I bust out the ban hammer? nah! I save that for trolls!You're responding to people who haven't been on the forums for years. The post you responded to was 10 years old. You can think Randall for posting a new post in a dead thread. In the Astronomy forum, you would get banned for doing that
dealt with! thank you for flying the unfriendly skies!Some twit got signed in as me thanks to that forum bug we've all been dealing with.
Everyone please delete anything that you've quoted from me today - none of that crap was posted by me, and I don't want my name associated with any of that trash-talking idiocy.
Thank you.
Posturing? Yes. Meaningless? Not necessarily. The issues cited in the article are serious.Meaningless political posturing.