• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Rendlesham Forest?

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

russhorseman

russhorseman

Not Too Deep A Thinker
Guys,

I'm reading Georgina Bruni's You Can't Tell the People, the exhaustive account of the Rendlesham Forest incident back in 1980. Have you ever done a show on this case? I searched the archives and might have missed it. I'd love to hear The Paracast's take on this fascinating case.

Thanks for all you do.

Russ
 
I dont think there has ever been a specific show on this but it has been discussed before in various episodes.
Out of the blue the documentary does a fairly good piece on it.
 
russhorseman said:
Guys,

I'm reading Georgina Bruni's You Can't Tell the People, the exhaustive account of the Rendlesham Forest incident back in 1980. Have you ever done a show on this case? I searched the archives and might have missed it. I'd love to hear The Paracast's take on this fascinating case.

Thanks for all you do.

Russ
Click to expand...


It's a great parable on skeptical thinking.
 
There was a Peter Robbins interview not long ago, I think. I remember David asked whether it could have been a psy-op, which I suppose is possible, but I must say the accounts have many specifics that very, very strongly suggest a test of a EMP weapon, along with a few conjuring tricks (either to add a psy-op effect or to distract the airmen from what was really going on). UFO Hunters did a show on it, relying on Vince Thurkettle, "solving" it all as a lighthouse effect, which struck me as very weak. Hard to tell what is really going on with those guys.
 
Guys,
Your probably all sick to death of the term Remote Viewing but I have to tell you remote viewers know what really happened at rendlesham and its not what you think it is. yes, something did land there but it certainly was NOT of ET origin. The answer may surprise alot of folk.

NSA
 
NSA said:
Guys,
Your probably all sick to death of the term Remote Viewing but I have to tell you remote viewers know what really happened at rendlesham and its not what you think it is. yes, something did land there but it certainly was NOT of ET origin. The answer may surprise alot of folk.

NSA
Click to expand...


Thanks for the cliff-hanger NSA, would you care to tell us what really landed there?
 
NSA said:
Guys,
Your probably all sick to death of the term Remote Viewing but I have to tell you remote viewers know what really happened at rendlesham and its not what you think it is. yes, something did land there but it certainly was NOT of ET origin. The answer may surprise alot of folk.

NSA
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll bite....so....What DID 'happen' there, then.?
 
Bixyboo said:
Ok, I'll bite....so....What DID 'happen' there, then.?
Click to expand...

Youll find out soon enough. We employed the use of one of the best Remote Viewers in the world on this case as well as a few other remote viewers. There has been alot of utter BS about what happened but funny enough the eye witnesses at the time pretty much described it as it happened. Someone mentioned Georgina Bruni's book, "You Cant Tell The People" which does hold some clues as to what happened but its still somewhat biased towards the ET theory. Please do NOT take Nick Pope's claims seriously either. As as ex MOD personel he should have known EXACTLY what landed there, where it came from and the whole cover up. I dont trust the guy knowing what I know now about the event.

I can only tell you this for now. The craft was man made, Triangular and originated from the US.

Makes you wonder where these flying triangles seen by many people today actually came from.

'Nuff Said

NSA
 
NSA said:
Youll find out soon enough. We employed the use of one of the best Remote Viewers in the world on this case as well as a few other remote viewers. There has been alot of utter BS about what happened but funny enough the eye witnesses at the time pretty much described it as it happened. Someone mentioned Georgina Bruni's book, "You Cant Tell The People" which does hold some clues as to what happened but its still somewhat biased towards the ET theory. Please do NOT take Nick Pope's claims seriously either. As as ex MOD personel he should have known EXACTLY what landed there, where it came from and the whole cover up. I dont trust the guy knowing what I know now about the event.

I can only tell you this for now. The craft was man made, Triangular and originated from the US.

Makes you wonder where these flying triangles seen by many people today actually came from.

'Nuff Said

NSA
Click to expand...


Ok NSA. So you gave us a bit more info..that it was apparently a man-made gov. experimental craft and technology, then?

So...when are you gonna say more? Or are you just enjoying being 'mysterious' ?
 
This doesn't really make me think about the 'flying triangles' at all. The description of this object is different than the 'flying triangles'. This was smaller, I guess sort of like a pod or satellite like object. The others are bigger and probably are mad made.
 
DVS said:
This doesn't really make me think about the 'flying triangles' at all. The description of this object is different than the 'flying triangles'. This was smaller, I guess sort of like a pod or satellite like object. The others are bigger and probably are mad made.
Click to expand...

Well it was a triangle and it was flying.
Also bear in made the appearance of this object onto the ufo scene back in the early 80's.
Back in those days Black Flying Triangles were not as common as they are today.
You could think of this technology as perhaps an early prototype of what witnesses are seeing today.
Or it could be something else entirely..
Remember we are talking about an event that occured almost 30 years ago.
There is a lot you can accomplish within that period...in total secrecy.

NSA
 
pupilstutor said:
NSA

You don't have a clue. There were three different craft involved not including small basketball sized flying objects.
Click to expand...

Feel free to believe what you want. But please don't say I don't have a clue especially if you believe the main sighting
Was nothing more than "basketballs"

Like I said we know what happened. You don't.

NSA.
 
NSA said:
Well it was a triangle and it was flying.

Also bear in made the appearance of this object onto the ufo scene back in the early 80's.
Back in those days Black Flying Triangles were not as common as they are today.
You could think of this technology as perhaps an early prototype of what witnesses are seeing today.
Or it could be something else entirely..
Remember we are talking about an event that occured almost 30 years ago.
There is a lot you can accomplish within that period...in total secrecy.

NSA
Click to expand...

It wasn't flying, it landed and one of the witnesses approached and claims to have touched it. I really think you don't know anything about the event and that's self evident by now.
 
DVS said:
It wasn't flying, it landed and one of the witnesses approached and claims to have touched it. I really think you don't know anything about the event and that's self evident by now.
Click to expand...

The only thing evident here is your rudeness and ignorance.

I havent even told you what happened or what EXACTLY remote viewers were tasked against you seem to think we are talking about EVERY SINGLE DETAIL from the rendelsham story which is NOT what we tasked.Viewers were simply tasked against factual evidence such as the landing site and specifically what caused the radiation at the landing site at a specific date and time FULL STOP.

We dont care about your pet theory or whatever you have read in the past. Secondly if something landed it obviously must have been airbourne and data suggest the object which caused
those indentations and traces of high radiation was airbourne ....flying.

NSA
 
Back
Top