• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Stupidity, Thy Name is Nussbeck

Free episodes:

I'm not usually a grammar snob, but I stopped reading when I saw "Alien's" for the second time, instead of "aliens". If someone claims to be a writer, the least they can do is know when, and when not to use a capital letter, and when, and when not to use an apostrophe. Yeah, petty I know :D.
 
I'm not usually a grammar snob, but I stopped reading when I saw "Alien's" for the second time, instead of "aliens". If someone claims to be a writer, the least they can do is know when, and when not to use a capital letter, and when, and when not to use an apostrophe. Yeah, petty I know :D.

crawls under the persian rug, and hope no one notices my obvious bulge
 
Wow. Federation of planets and Palladians :rolleyes:.

Builds his case with compelling stuff (1541 nuremberg..etc.) only to destroy the effort with truths by proclamation.
 
I don't see how the author makes his conclusions from his presentation.

Who are the "scientists" that deemed the photo (and by inference his "pictograph analysis") "real?"

While I have my own beliefs regarding the legitimacy of aliens and UFOs, I do not think that there is enough quantifiable data/evidence to prove a) the origin of the craft b) the origin of the occupants c) the reason that they are seen around earth. Nor do I think there is anything other than speculation when one concludes something about our "visitors."
 
Taking a Rorschach blot picture and from it making two entire alien races, each along with their own respective agenda.

Who does that sound like? Oh, I know -- maybe Nussbeck and Hoagland drink the same punch?

What a nut job.
 
I'm not usually a grammar snob, but I stopped reading when I saw "Alien's" for the second time, instead of "aliens". If someone claims to be a writer, the least they can do is know when, and when not to use a capital letter, and when, and when not to use an apostrophe. Yeah, petty I know :D.

NOT petty. That is the way I feel. People are so afraid to make a mistake, they throw everything in they think of, instead of just reaching for a handy reference book. One of my favourite bad examples was on a menu: Scrambled Egg's.

Words can be used like paint to create an image, those who know the rules can get away with breaking them in order to creat a masterpiece; the rest of us have to reach for that reference book just to follow the numbers...
 
In order for there to be waste, must there not first be something in the bucket???

Indeed, I stand corrected. Nussbeck is truly moronic, I started listening to an interview with him on a car-crash called "Paradigm Radio" with the incredibly mindless "Raven", and I couldn't take more than a few minutes, my brain cells started atrophying faster than the speed of farts.

dB
 
It was a particularly special moment when he mentioned that the "Alien's" are here looking for "spice."

(Anyone know of a reputable site online that does give information about astronauts' UFO experiences?)
 
Does the hubble have a shot of this giant present? If so,I bet it's photoshop'd. The first sentence in the second paragraph has me glued to my couch.
 
Jeez, if you think the article is a load of twaddle, check out the comments section, and what some of those blinkered, delusional idiots are saying about David. Did you know that: [SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]DB is a professional debunker from New York who is a self professed MAC Master... He goes to every site debunking and lying about every article written. My friend tell me he is paid to attack UFO article's. He has in the past used intimidation and threats.[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]And how about these profound words of wisdom:
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]DB, you offer no proof that anything said by Mr.Nussbeck is not true, your hatefull attitude is frightful. You should consult a doctor for this mental disorder quickly. Everyone is entitled to their views but I think you protest to much......[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]Aaaaaaaaarrrgggh. No wonder the UFO field is messed up to the point of being totally effed! It's hardly surprising that sensible, rational individuals like Don Ecker, have decided to jump ship. I'm starting to seriously regret ever having publicly allied myself with the UFO subject, for fear of being tarred with the same brush as such myopic and illogical imbeciles.

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
 
Jeez, if you think the article is a load of twaddle, check out the comments section, and what some of those blinkered, delusional idiots are saying about David. Did you know that: [SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]DB is a professional debunker from New York who is a self professed MAC Master... He goes to every site debunking and lying about every article written. My friend tell me he is paid to attack UFO article's. He has in the past used intimidation and threats.[/SIZE][/SIZE]

Interesting that that commenter misuses apostrophes in exactly the same way as Nussbeck does.
 
Back
Top