NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I'm sorry, but to call this a documentary does a disservive to people who make real documentaries. This was a publicity stunt. What did we learn? That MacDonalds is bad for you when eaten in excess? Well, d'uh. Even MacDonalds will admit that.
The doc's were wrong and didn't know how bad off the guy would be btw. That is if this is the same guy I read about. So even educated people on health, or at least disease, did learn from it I gather.
I didn't learn much from your documentary btw. I think I saw one of them. It was still enjoyable.
Kimball, have you ever given serious thought to making a mockumentary? A UFO mockumentary, maybe. Wait, Mr. Vaeni made one of those already.
Greg Bishop, Mac Tonnies and I were having a drink once in LA, and we started discussing the idea of hoaxing a UFO incident and filming it, and people's reactions to it, as sort of a real-life mockumentary. I could certainly do such a thing - I have the tech know-how and the necessary equipment to do a good job of it. And it would be fun, in a sense. But then, after a chuckle, we all decided that most ufologists do a pretty good job of unknowingly making fun of themselves, so we decided against it.
For now.
Besides, somebody already beat me to the hoaxing stuff with MJ-12.
Seriously, though, I've never really been a fan of mockumentaries, with the notable exception of This is Spinal Tap, so it's not something I would ever consider as a film project.
That MacDonalds is bad for you when eaten in excess? Well, d'uh. Even MacDonalds will admit that.
thanks for posting this, I have been wanting to watch this for some time now and I'll watch it this week. I havn't eaten at McDonalds in about 20 years. My girlfriend and I used to frequent Micky D's every week. One night we drove through the drive thru and then parked in a spot in the parking lot to eat. It was kinda dark but we could see with light from parking lot lights and nearby businesses. I took a bite and thought it wasn't very good and then another to make sure. She did the same and said she didn't want it. I turned on the interior and both were Raw, Raw, RAW inside! I took it back in, stood in line and when I got to the cashier/supervisor woman I said a few choice words and opened the box (they came in a styrofoam container then, not sure about now) and let everyone see it standing in line. She snatched that thing outta my hand faster than you could blink. I thought the Flash came through or something. She threw it under the counter and immediately ...I mean immediately put on that stupid ass fake big smile and said "welcome to Mc'Donald's, how can I help you?" I think everyone just sort of stood there looking at her, each other and me and was ...WTF? I just walked out.
just curious. who do you feel the "publicity stunt" was for? I guess I'm a little slow. I thought all documentaries were some what of a publicity stunt to draw attention to a cause or certain subject. I guess I don't understand your objection and assumption that everyone already knows all of the facts that they put forth in the movie. And can you please layout the proper format for a "real documentary" for those of us that don't know what we should be looking for in a "real one". And I'm saying all of this in the nicest tone.:I'm sorry, but to call this a documentary does a disservive to people who make real documentaries. This was a publicity stunt. What did we learn? That MacDonalds is bad for you when eaten in excess? Well, d'uh. Even MacDonalds will admit that.
just curious. who do you feel the "publicity stunt" was for? I guess I'm a little slow. I thought all documentaries were some what of a publicity stunt to draw attention to a cause or certain subject. I guess I don't understand your objection and assumption that everyone already knows all of the facts that they put forth in the movie. And can you please layout the proper format for a "real documentary" for those of us that don't know what we should be looking for in a "real one". And I'm saying all of this in the nicest tone.:
Well, thank goodness for personal opinion, and agreeing to disagree.
I'm sorry, but to call this a documentary does a disservive to people who make real documentaries. This was a publicity stunt. What did we learn? That MacDonalds is bad for you when eaten in excess? Well, d'uh. Even MacDonalds will admit that.
I do know what you do for a living. I've seen it in plenty of other posts.I make docs for a living (as well as other types of programs and films), and I respect them, and the people that make them. That's why it irks me to see something like Supersize Me called a doc - don't get me started on some of Michael Moore's propaganda pieces, or Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (which won an Oscar for pete's sake!). There's nothing wrong with making stuff like that (I quite enjoyed AIT, on its own terms, as the world's most expensive powerpoint presentation), but to consider them documentaries diminishes the work of real documentarians, which sadly often goes unnoticed by the general public at large.
Raise your hands - how many people saw Sicko? How many saw Fog of War? One was a true doc, and one was a philippic. There is a difference.
And that's all I'll say about this, because we're talking from different perspectives.