NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I see that Rramjet's misunderstanding of the burden of proof continues apace. It's not a skeptic's burden to prove what hauntings are NOT, it's up to ghost believers to show that hauntings are caused by something or other. Obviously.As far as I can tell there is no evidence to support the contention that the cause of (some) hauntings (however unlikely it may seem) is not “dead people” -
So when you signed up, you read this:It is a permanent (not a temporaray) "administrative suspension" carlitos and the only way I am able to have that suspension removed is to reveal my true identity to the JREF (I did sign up under an alias -
... and you supplied false information anyway. Got it.
If you do not supply the information or supply false information your Membership will not be approved.
I don't know and I don't care. I'm not the type of guy who breaks a rule, admits it publicly (!), suffers the predictable consequences, and then tries to shift the blame by pointing at other (anonymous?) rule-breakers. I tend to take responsibility for my own actions.but how many other JREF members have been banned under the same rule carlitos?
The word is imprimatur (it's from the Latin - "let it be printed") (on edit, the other word is "moderators")- and considering the vitriol and abuse I have received in the forum - with the obvious impromature of the moderaters - I am not about to do that and consequently risk my name then being blackened outside the forum. I have a career and a family I wish to protect from such assaults. So unless I hand over my real name and details to the JREF - which given their behaviour toward me I am not about to do
Rramjet said:[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 100%, align: center"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: alt1, bgcolor: #F6F6F6"]Recently some identifying information was divulged about me in one of the threads, but despite appeals to the moderators, they have (so far) not acted to remove that information in order to protect my privacy. The JREF privacy policy states that they will "strive" to protect the privacy of members, but clearly that policy is not being acted on.
So I give this warning - If members of the JREF find out any personal information about you - JREF will do nothing to protect your privacy and will allow that information to be published on their own site.
Potential and current members then BEWARE. You privacy will not be respected or protected by JREF - even if you put in a specific request that they do so.[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
No, it's not. You are still administratively suspended, because you filled out your membership application with false information. Your martyrdom complex requires you to believe that you are being persecuted, but you're the only one who thinks so.- then I have - in effect - been permanently banned from posting - it is as simple as that.
Lawd, you in tubble now! They've stalked ya all the way over here. Like I said before "I don't waste my time on zealots." Welcome to the forums Rramjet. We do try to be civil and if you leave I am certain none of our mods will chase you around the internet.
I am not a moderator, and do not speak for the JREF forum in any way. I only posted here because, as Rramjet is suspended at JREF, I couldn't communicate with him there. He appears not to understand this. He's not banned. Not. Banned.
I just re-read this and I might have been wrong here. I don't remember whether the paracast forum asked for my real name or just a username. JREF does ask for your real name, because it's an educational foundation with an endowment to protect.I registered both at the JREF and at this forum with my real name. Both have privacy policies that prevent them from revealing my personal information.
I just re-read this and I might have been wrong here. I don't remember whether the paracast forum asked for my real name or just a username. JREF does ask for your real name, because it's an educational foundation with an endowment to protect.
I just re-read this and I might have been wrong here. I don't remember whether the paracast forum asked for my real name or just a username. JREF does ask for your real name, because it's an educational foundation with an endowment to protect.
He's not banned. Not. Banned
Who gives a rats ass..rats. ASS!
Well, considering Rramjet is lying, it's a valid point. If people were going around lying about this site I would be annoyed.
I'm gonna go and lie about this site and the randi site. I'm not gonna tell ya where I'm going either. Seriously, Angel that's not cool. You are just knee jerk defending jerks and you are better than that. You don't know if the guy lied or not. You just know he slammed your team. Maybe he's wrong or he might be right. But, "liar" from a mod to a new poster is a little to harsh. I say this as someone who trust your integrity even as I disagree with your world view.
And Angelo, just how is he lying? I thought he was pretty clear, he used a "username" because he didn't want the Troll's following him in his "real life." Sheesh!
Hey, I been stalked and can understand his feelings. As a matter of fact I been stalked by some real psychos in the past ... one bearded psycho is currently stalking not only me but Gene on the UFO Mag. website. A genuine mentally deranged moron surrounded by a flock of cackling crows. It comes with the territory.
Decker
Guys, he's saying that he was banned, and he wasn't. If that site wants you to submit your real name to post there, it's up to them. I don't agree with it, but it's not up to me.
Just because you don't agfree with the JREF doesn't mean you have to agree with everyone that has a beef with them. In all honesty, I think it's silly that he came here to complain about them.
Rramjet, Carlitos, please continue posting here - you're welcome to do so. I won't ban you unless you really go off the rails.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]With whom your information may be shared.[/FONT]As a general rule, the JREF will not disclose or share any of your personally identifiable information except if you have given permission or when we believe in good faith that the law requires it.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]How your information is secured.[/FONT]
Other than officers of the JREF, agents acting on behalf of the JREF or the administrators and moderators of the JREF Forum you are the only person who has access to your personal information.
Your information is protected by the security of the Forum software and your password. The JREF strongly recommends that you do not share your password to anyone.
(obviously, they have a disclaimer - carlitos)
Unfortunately it is not possible to guarantee that any data transmitted over the Internet is 100% secure. As a result, whilst the JREF will strive to protect your personal information, the JREF cannot guarantee the security of any information you transmit to us from or via the Forum.
[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 100%, align: center"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: alt1, bgcolor: #F6F6F6"]8. You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion.[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]