Trouble in Paradise with "The Dream Team"

[DaveM]

Perfectly valid evidence includes:

• Materials.
• Firsthand experience.
• Firsthand reports based on firsthand experience.
• Firsthand reports based on instrumented detection ( e.g. radar, photo, video ).
• Recordings from instrumented detection devices.
• Trace evidence of interaction between the environment and an object.
• Analytical ( investigative ) reports based on any combination of the above.

An example of material evidence that has a history of being deceptive is the Bob White artifact, allegedly ejected from a UFO:

Here's a skeptical article on the Bob White Artifact: http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-10-12/

Another example of deceptive physical evidence are the alleged alien implants. These examples of material evidence prove that material evidence is often far from being conclusive or even worthy of consideration as serious as some non-material evidence. Examples of non-physical evidence that is more convincing than material evidence like implants or the Bob white Artifact is covered in these posts:

• Zimbabwe U.F.O. incident | The Paracast Community Forums
• UFO Documentary - Australia (2009) - Westall 1966: A Suburban UFO Mystery | Page 2 | The Paracast Community Forums

If we are talking about the Roswell incident, almost none of the evidence you refer to does not exist. Materials...no. First hand experiencers... almost all dead. We have Jesse Marcel Jr.s report of seeing the debris from the wreck. No instrumented detection reports. No trace evidence. No analytical reports on previous items.

I would not count on skeptic.com for an even handed review of anything, to be honest. Their slant is to disprove everything possible.