CapnG
Devil's Advocate
Karma to you
Uh-huh.
I can't help but notice you didn't answer the question I posed. That's getting to be a habit for you lately.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Karma to you
Uh-huh.
I can't help but notice you didn't answer the question I posed. That's getting to be a habit for you lately.
Uh-huh Get a life buddy!
Blowfish, I do think CapnG did pose a valid question. I think that if I did investigate it and found it to be mundane, no amount of evidence I could present would convince anyone that I wasn't trying to debunk it. Hence it not being worth my time to investigate it as has been suggested. The doctor saw something he couldn't explain - he explicitly states that he thinks it wasn't from this planet.
"telling someone on this board to 'get a life'... kinda falls flat"
Well, there was a time when I had better things to do on a Friday night than read about UFOs, but...
Nothing personal Angelo, I was just pointing out what a wonderful opportunity you have to dive in and be a part of the solution. Here's your perfect opportunity to muster the troops, dive in, check it out and get directly involved in attempting to solve the mystery. What a great lead!
"Ziegler is shaken and certain of what he saw. 'This left me with the deep sense that I had seen something not from this planet.'"
If this had happened in my neck of the woods, I'd be out beating the bushes, making the phone calls gathering data etc....
It really sucks when people expect others to always be the ones to do the hard work interviewing witnesses, making the calls and doing the legwork. Unless you've been motivated to do the work, how can you expect to be taken seriously? Dang...
Better than a armchair critic!Radar? Nope. Landing traces? Nope. Video? Nope. Pictures? Nope. A few people who saw something that distressed them in the sky? Yep.
A terrific lead indeed!
I know! I Angelo, intrepid ufo investigator extrordinare, will, with the help of my special task force of professionals, track down these people and pester them with deep insightful questions! Never mind that I have not done this before. My supreme intelligence will see me through! I will, with my presumptiveness boldly announce that I am acting on behalf of The Paracast! Those witnesses will be so impressed with me they will spill their guts more completely and profoundly than in the entire history of spilling or guts!
Get real man. This is essentially what you are asking Angelo to do and the way you are asking him to think. Angelo is a smart guy. Why do you want him to act like a goof? Do you have that little respect for him?
Besides, if you really think that engaging in direct investigation is a prerequisite for discernment in a field that has no established investigative standards or prerequisites you are adrift in your own circular logic.
One more thing for you to think about. Are all the folks out there in the trenches doing the grunt work really helping? Or are quite a few seriously poisoning the pool with poor research? Or even worse, making a complete utter mockery of the field? You want more of that? Really? What you are advocating is going to lead to just that.
Better than a armchair critic!
Not really. Sloppy investigation would just give debunkers more ammo by allowing them to attack both the data and the investigator. The armchair critic has no such impact on the field.
You missed something. It was Christopher who said that.Uhhh, I must have missed something Ron. Or you are addressing another concern. I have absolutely no intention of saying somebody should "represent" the Paracast. My point was that 'experienced" field research by people with the resources and time to do it is a good thing. I'm afraid that the paranormal until/unless it gets private funds for research or the military does it will always be a fringe investigation/scientific endeavor. That said I still think investigation is a good thing and I salute folks like Chris and Jim Marrs and scientist such as Taarg and Sheldrake. Other than that I didn't mean to go where this has headed.
Wow, aren't you lucky? Right there in YOUR town! I'm sure you've made the phonecalls to your network and have dispatched the troops to the site to do an in-depth investigation.... Inquiring paracaster minds are awaiting the results of YOUR investigation!!!
Anything we can do to help, don't hesitate to ask...
Cool!
How do you know?
Radar? Nope. Landing traces? Nope. Video? Nope. Pictures? Nope. A few people who saw something that distressed them in the sky? Yep.
A terrific lead indeed!
I know! I Angelo, intrepid ufo investigator extrordinare, will, with the help of my special task force of professionals, track down these people and pester them with deep insightful questions! Never mind that I have not done this before. My supreme intelligence will see me through! I will, with my presumptiveness boldly announce that I am acting on behalf of The Paracast! Those witnesses will be so impressed with me they will spill their guts more completely and profoundly than in the entire history of spilling or guts!
Get real man. This is essentially what you are asking Angelo to do and the way you are asking him to think. Angelo is a smart guy. Why do you want him to act like a goof? Do you have that little respect for him?
Besides, if you really think that engaging in direct investigation is a prerequisite for discernment in a field that has no established investigative standards or prerequisites you are adrift in your own circular logic.
One more thing for you to think about. Are all the folks out there in the trenches doing the grunt work really helping? Or are quite a few seriously poisoning the pool with poor research? Or even worse, making a complete utter mockery of the field? You want more of that? Really? What you are advocating is going to lead to just that.