• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

UFO in Montreal

Free episodes:

Uh-huh;) Get a life buddy!

Dude, seriously when did you turn into such a complete and total dick? I remember having conversations with you in the past the were both civil and informative. WTF?

Oh and for future reference, telling someone on this board to "get a life"... kinda falls flat.
 
Blowfish, I do think CapnG did pose a valid question. I think that if I did investigate it and found it to be mundane, no amount of evidence I could present would convince anyone that I wasn't trying to debunk it. Hence it not being worth my time to investigate it as has been suggested. The doctor saw something he couldn't explain - he explicitly states that he thinks it wasn't from this planet.
 
Blowfish, I do think CapnG did pose a valid question. I think that if I did investigate it and found it to be mundane, no amount of evidence I could present would convince anyone that I wasn't trying to debunk it. Hence it not being worth my time to investigate it as has been suggested. The doctor saw something he couldn't explain - he explicitly states that he thinks it wasn't from this planet.


Angel of loren ,
I happy for you ;)and the other member needs to use profanities is not worth a mention;)
 
I think over all, the back biting (or perceived ) is disappointing to say the least. This would have been a good time for people to pull together and interview - clearly this was seen by several people. So while it still fresh in people minds, others would prefer to snap, snipe and snip at others. Disappointing.
Had I lived closer, I would have been there trying to find out where ever I could find, Listening to so many of the past shows, provides people with a general idea of what to ask. IS there any way we can find out who else was involved, give me names and I would try talking to them.
 
"telling someone on this board to 'get a life'... kinda falls flat"

Well, there was a time when I had better things to do on a Friday night than read about UFOs, but...
 
"telling someone on this board to 'get a life'... kinda falls flat"

Well, there was a time when I had better things to do on a Friday night than read about UFOs, but...

That's not quite what I meant but you gotta admit, to people in the "real world" those of us on this board would probably be pictured as a collection overweight, 40 year-old virgins, living in our parent's basements, squintilly typing away on the interwebs about things that don't exist and arguing about things that are really only taken seriously by idiots, lunatics and the snake-oil salesmen that prey on them.

That doesn't exactly leave a lot of high-ground to claim. Actually, it's kind of depressing.

Also, since personal and personnel have differently stressed accents they can't really be considered homophones either. Whoops... my bad.
 
So I contacted the Quebec UFO Research guys. I'll let you know if I hear back. Basically, I have asked if they want to jump on the forum and talk about the case they are investigating. Apparently, Chris Rutkowski is the prominent researcher. He has been a guest on the Paracast. So hopefully we will hear back.
 
Here's my thing about this: Angel is right in that if he did find it was a balloon somebody would say 'no it wasn't your just a debunker." ON the other hand the reverse is also true. An astronaught or a pilot who says "it was a craft" is told it was Venus or a weather balloon or the sub conscious manifestation of the birth canal. :-)

I'm not a beleiever in u.f.o.' s but Leslie Keene (did i spell the rite?) :-) has really gotten me to thinking more seroiusly about it lately.

As always scuse muh spillin but I ain't goin back over it and kerectin it. :-)
 
Nothing personal Angelo, I was just pointing out what a wonderful opportunity you have to dive in and be a part of the solution. Here's your perfect opportunity to muster the troops, dive in, check it out and get directly involved in attempting to solve the mystery. What a great lead!

"Ziegler is shaken and certain of what he saw. 'This left me with the deep sense that I had seen something not from this planet.'"

If this had happened in my neck of the woods, I'd be out beating the bushes, making the phone calls gathering data etc....

It really sucks when people expect others to always be the ones to do the hard work interviewing witnesses, making the calls and doing the legwork. Unless you've been motivated to do the work, how can you expect to be taken seriously? Dang...

Radar? Nope. Landing traces? Nope. Video? Nope. Pictures? Nope. A few people who saw something that distressed them in the sky? Yep.

A terrific lead indeed!

I know! I Angelo, intrepid ufo investigator extrordinare, will, with the help of my special task force of professionals, track down these people and pester them with deep insightful questions! Never mind that I have not done this before. My supreme intelligence will see me through! I will, with my presumptiveness boldly announce that I am acting on behalf of The Paracast! Those witnesses will be so impressed with me they will spill their guts more completely and profoundly than in the entire history of spilling or guts!

Get real man. This is essentially what you are asking Angelo to do and the way you are asking him to think. Angelo is a smart guy. Why do you want him to act like a goof? Do you have that little respect for him?

Besides, if you really think that engaging in direct investigation is a prerequisite for discernment in a field that has no established investigative standards or prerequisites you are adrift in your own circular logic.

One more thing for you to think about. Are all the folks out there in the trenches doing the grunt work really helping? Or are quite a few seriously poisoning the pool with poor research? Or even worse, making a complete utter mockery of the field? You want more of that? Really? What you are advocating is going to lead to just that.
 
Radar? Nope. Landing traces? Nope. Video? Nope. Pictures? Nope. A few people who saw something that distressed them in the sky? Yep.

A terrific lead indeed!

I know! I Angelo, intrepid ufo investigator extrordinare, will, with the help of my special task force of professionals, track down these people and pester them with deep insightful questions! Never mind that I have not done this before. My supreme intelligence will see me through! I will, with my presumptiveness boldly announce that I am acting on behalf of The Paracast! Those witnesses will be so impressed with me they will spill their guts more completely and profoundly than in the entire history of spilling or guts!

Get real man. This is essentially what you are asking Angelo to do and the way you are asking him to think. Angelo is a smart guy. Why do you want him to act like a goof? Do you have that little respect for him?

Besides, if you really think that engaging in direct investigation is a prerequisite for discernment in a field that has no established investigative standards or prerequisites you are adrift in your own circular logic.

One more thing for you to think about. Are all the folks out there in the trenches doing the grunt work really helping? Or are quite a few seriously poisoning the pool with poor research? Or even worse, making a complete utter mockery of the field? You want more of that? Really? What you are advocating is going to lead to just that.
Better than a armchair critic!:)
 
To say or insinuate that "going out and investigating" isn't better than not investigtating is kind of silly. Not getting into the whole thing between Christ and Angel. I'm talking in general. Yeah, there is a lot of bad investigation but the alternative (common sense here guys) is not to "not" investigate. If nobody had ever researched and investigated going to the moon we would still be reading sci fi and talking about it. Nothing wrong with that but it's not the same as actually going there. I'm not an investigator. Angel isn't an investigator. It's o.k. we both have our places. But, don't knock Chris because he's "out there investigating" it make you look silly and petty. By the way I don't think Chris hates Angel and I don't think Angel is a close minded person . I just think they are coming from two different mindsets and both have strong opinions. But, the investigation part? Don't knock that or at least in my opinion you shouldn't knock that. :-)

---------- Post added at 12:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 PM ----------

OMG! I said Christ and Angel. The Fruedian implications are mind boggling. LOL! I'm gonna leave it. :-)
 
Expecting the average Joe to engage in investigations of sightings with no training is pointless and counterproductive. Any conclusions they make could be ripped apart by the opposition. It's just not a good idea. I see nothing wrong with people being interested in the subject matter but not wanting to engage it. That is precisely why the Paracast and other outlets exist. This is not a private inestigator/researcher forum. It is a public forum that discusses the paranormal. I think it rediculous that anyone would expect the forum to be 'represented' in an investigation. That is not the stated purpose. What it shows is the willingness of some to snip at every minor detail from those with whom they disagree.

This sort of stuff is a huge reason that real progress and compromise has not and likely will not be made. For me it is frustrating. Its like looking at ta chess board and seeing that stalemate is the best option and that winning is impossible. Yet neither side is willing to concede and work towads the compromise. Very frustrating.

Also, I doubt Gene wants forum members running around claiming to be representatives of his show and company brand while pestering the shit out of people that have sightings. I sure that can't have any possible legal repercussions.

The whole idea that the forum needs to be represented in an investigation needs to really end here in my opinion. Before this gets out of hand.
 
Uhhh, I must have missed something Ron. Or you are addressing another concern. I have absolutely no intention of saying somebody should "represent" the Paracast. My point was that 'experienced" field research by people with the resources and time to do it is a good thing. I'm afraid that the paranormal until/unless it gets private funds for research or the military does it will always be a fringe investigation/scientific endeavor. That said I still think investigation is a good thing and I salute folks like Chris and Jim Marrs and scientist such as Taarg and Sheldrake. Other than that I didn't mean to go where this has headed. :-)
 
Uhhh, I must have missed something Ron. Or you are addressing another concern. I have absolutely no intention of saying somebody should "represent" the Paracast. My point was that 'experienced" field research by people with the resources and time to do it is a good thing. I'm afraid that the paranormal until/unless it gets private funds for research or the military does it will always be a fringe investigation/scientific endeavor. That said I still think investigation is a good thing and I salute folks like Chris and Jim Marrs and scientist such as Taarg and Sheldrake. Other than that I didn't mean to go where this has headed. :-)
You missed something. It was Christopher who said that.

Wow, aren't you lucky? Right there in YOUR town! I'm sure you've made the phonecalls to your network and have dispatched the troops to the site to do an in-depth investigation.... Inquiring paracaster minds are awaiting the results of YOUR investigation!!!

Anything we can do to help, don't hesitate to ask...
Cool!

Of course investigation is a good thing tyder. But the age old attitude "If you ain't doing it you have no basis or place to speak of it" is not only wrong but in some cases dangerous. Think about the cases where the it is being done to you." Like, corruption in politics, ripoff consumer products, police brutality, medical malpractice and bad media reporting.

Bad UFO investigation is just a small subset of bad media reporting. There are potential victims involved and those potential victims certainly have every place and basis in the world to speak of it.
 
How do you know?

Because we see it all the time. Guys like McGaha and Schermer always like to bring up cases were self-styled Ufologists declare they have "irrifutable proof" of whatever that upon further professional scrutiny turns out to be something mundane. Then they hold that up like a standard bearer and declare all paranormal investigations worthless.

That's infinitely more damaging to the subject matter than some random, anonymous critical comment on page X of a thread buried in the back of an internet message board.
 
Radar? Nope. Landing traces? Nope. Video? Nope. Pictures? Nope. A few people who saw something that distressed them in the sky? Yep.

A terrific lead indeed!

I know! I Angelo, intrepid ufo investigator extrordinare, will, with the help of my special task force of professionals, track down these people and pester them with deep insightful questions! Never mind that I have not done this before. My supreme intelligence will see me through! I will, with my presumptiveness boldly announce that I am acting on behalf of The Paracast! Those witnesses will be so impressed with me they will spill their guts more completely and profoundly than in the entire history of spilling or guts!

Get real man. This is essentially what you are asking Angelo to do and the way you are asking him to think. Angelo is a smart guy. Why do you want him to act like a goof? Do you have that little respect for him?

Besides, if you really think that engaging in direct investigation is a prerequisite for discernment in a field that has no established investigative standards or prerequisites you are adrift in your own circular logic.

One more thing for you to think about. Are all the folks out there in the trenches doing the grunt work really helping? Or are quite a few seriously poisoning the pool with poor research? Or even worse, making a complete utter mockery of the field? You want more of that? Really? What you are advocating is going to lead to just that.

I really appreciate what you said and you succinctly put into words exactly what I was thinking.
 
Back
Top