Opponents hold that the presence of such a race would give the lie to the claim of
Jesus Christ that He came to take away the sin of the world.
[15], and that He died once and only once to bring this about. They contend that since Jesus is referred to singly (as he was an individual person), this rules out the possibility of an alien counterpart to Jesus, and that an alien counterpart to Jesus is a necessary precondition for an alien nation to exist.
[16][17]--and that Kingdom is also not of this universe, or "cosmos".
Defenders of the compatibility position might insist that neither of the two verses named above speaks directly to the uniqueness claim. But the original
Hebrew and
Greek texts use definite article adjectives and references to a specific person named
Adam (and another, named
Jesus), with no hint that either Adam or Jesus had any counterpart elsewhere in the cosmos. These things militate in favor of uniqueness almost as well as any direct negation of plurality might. Again, compatibility defenders might cite a lack of evidence that any hypothetical alien race would
require counterparts to Jesus or Adam. But
Christian critics reply that if the Bible is real at all, then life does not arise out of non-life