• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Are Genies Playing this HAARP?

Free episodes:

Well, there is no denying what that document states. It clearly declares:

"...a barrier to or confusing factor for hostile missiles or airplanes."
"...or even complete disruption of guidance systems..."
"...missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces..."
"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns..."

But does this document actually relate to HAARP? HAARP isn't mentioned at all in the text. It looks to me like some hypothetical facility many, many times more powerful, the effects of which - shall we say - are "bigged up" for the purposes of Cold War propaganda. All kinds of stuff is tossed in there.

For example, it also briefly mentions the possible local effects of high altitude nuclear bursts on the earth's magnetic field. This has nothing to do with HAARP and its transmissions - no matter how powerful it is supposed to be.

And why would the US put the patent of a secret defence/weather-controlling facility on the web for all to see? (A patent does not mean that the technology exists.)

The document is dated Jan 1985. OK, so if the technology didn't actually exist in 1985, it could now. Well like I said in post #15, how come no one noticed it operating if it's doing all this stuff? Not a wiggle of an ELF/VLF chart recorder - anywhere. Unless someone knows different...

Ian

HAARP is only one facility. I've heard there are a few more of these aerial arrays around the world. About "why it hasn't been noticed". Maybe because they don't want you to notice. I mean If I were going to be conducting weather manipulation I'd sure try and make sure an amateur meteorologist wasn't the first person to out my research.
 
HAARP is only one facility. I've heard there are a few more of these aerial arrays around the world. About "why it hasn't been noticed". Maybe because they don't want you to notice. I mean If I were going to be conducting weather manipulation I'd sure try and make sure an amateur meteorologist wasn't the first person to out my research.
There are several arrays around the world including a floating one from the US.
 
But does this document actually relate to HAARP? HAARP isn't mentioned at all in the text. It looks to me like some hypothetical facility many, many times more powerful, the effects of which - shall we say - are "bigged up" for the purposes of Cold War propaganda. All kinds of stuff is tossed in there.

[...]

And why would the US put the patent of a secret defence/weather-controlling facility on the web for all to see? (A patent does not mean that the technology exists.)

The document is dated Jan 1985. OK, so if the technology didn't actually exist in 1985, it could now. Well like I said in post #15, how come no one noticed it operating if it's doing all this stuff? Not a wiggle of an ELF/VLF chart recorder - anywhere. Unless someone knows different...

Ian

Excellent points. The underlined were my thoughts, too.
 
I've been having a look at HAARP Status site: TheWeatherSpace.com – High Frequency Detection

The site makes no technical sense at all.

"Longwave readings", "Shortwave readings"? What are these waves? Maybe it refers to radio waves. Fair enough if you believe radio waves do anything to the weather, but at what frequency? Where are the detectors? How do they process their data to create these maps? What is the M1 to M10 scale measuring? What is the magnitude of the increments?

From the website:
Version 2.0 of this program will feature a worldwide map with 50 new stations enabling all continents but Antarctica to be seen at once. Expect it this week.

Fifty new stations? Very impressive. Who's funding them? How is the data being brought back from these stations? What are they actually measuring? Who's paying for the data links? How are the station locations chosen? Can I help install one near me so I can take part in this phenomenal programme?

The impressive site graphics look like they've been tweaked from normal weather maps, and nice colours overlayed from temperature, humidity or barometric pressure maps.

Looks like an elaborate hoax to me, just to convince anyone with little scientific knowledge but who want to believe in this stuff. The Facebook page if full of the same.

After basic Googling to determine the owner/operator of HAARP Status, it turns out to be Kevin Martin, who appears to have a history of practical joking. Surely this guy could do something useful with his time and obvious talents...?
 
Last edited:
Evidence of man made hurricanes and cyclones. Look below the video for all the links backing up his data
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For anyone wanting to see what a true multi-megawatt, chaos-causing radio transmitter is like, have a listen and view here and here.

This truly colossal facility transmitted a very disruptive signal around the world from about 1976 to 1986. That certainly left an electromagnetic footprint each time it was operated!

Inevitably at the time there were all sorts of wild scare stories about what it was for; Russians controlling the weather, mind control, beam weapon, some doomsday machine - sound familiar?

Known variously as the Soviet Woodpecker, Gomel Pules, amongst other names, it appeared without warning, but its massively powerful signal caused pandemonium across the short-wave bands and broke through into all sorts of electronic equipment each time it was switched on. But it was only hours before its signal was DF'd to Gomel in Belarus. I was at the wrong end of it during its operation, trying to operate HF communications equipment.

It soon turned out to be a new type of over-the-horizon military radar, but the Soviets didn't care how much interference it caused, even to their own domestic and military radio communications until a couple of years later when it was 'fine-tuned' a bit.

I think it makes HAARP look a bit feeble...

Ian

Oh yeah--I recall all too well how The Woodpecker would reek havoc on the HF ham bands. Seems like, sometimes, you could transmit a string of "dits" on its frequency and it would move. Or maybe you just thought so because the da*mn thing was all over the bands anyway.
 
Back
Top