Ask Dr. David Jacobs

[kruggutter]

The "data" and the conclusions he draws are only as valid as the methods that are used. Some have identified significant problems with his methods, particularly in light of advances in the study of memory and genetics. But I suppose that discussion can wait until after the broadcast.

David Jacobs Wants Scientists To Take His Work Seriously. A Scientist Does Just That.

With respect, the scientist you've cited is one of the individuals part of the group that has been online Gang stalking
Dr. Jacobs non-stop for the last five years. The scientist in question has been actively supporting and condoning some
of the foulest and sleaziest of ad hominem attacks and smear tactics used against Jacobs by the other individuals in
that group. Regarding his stance on the Emma Woods matter he has, like many others, been drawing his conclusions
on incomplete evidence.

I'm not saying that this scientist's claims be discarded, I'm saying that because of the unethical behaviour he's supported
against Jacobs it is clear that he is biased against Jacobs, and therefore any claims that he makes about Jacobs need to be
fact checked.

 

[ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM]

All the bagging about Dr Jacobs let's focus on the new book and folks who have issues with him about past issues should pm instead instead turn the forum post as a slanging match poor form. Rather want to hear Dr Jacobs interview first by Gene and Chris maybe Dr Jacobs could post on this thread after the interview about his book only.

 

[matthew1977]

I've listened to 3 separate recent interviews with Dr. Jacobs (here and other places) and I found it interesting that no living ufo hypnotherapist can confirm Dr. Jacobs "hu-brid" theory. He only provides old data from deceased parties which cannot be collaborated (i.e. Budd Hopkins).

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk