But in response to the question:
Is Donald Trump a Crook?
Bing demurs:
Something went wrong. Refresh
Is Donald Trump a Crook?
Bing demurs:
Something went wrong. Refresh
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Of course he is. I really can't believe you Americans can not see the obvious.But in response to the question:
Is Donald Trump a Crook?
Bing demurs:
Something went wrong. Refresh
Similarly, a former Pentagon official who led a secret program to investigate UFOs said that the phenomenon is real and not from this world, but also cautioned against jumping to the conclusion that they are alien spaceships1.
Of course he is. I really can't believe you Americans can not see the obvious.
No evidence that laymen are (fully) aware of…As KDR notes in his latest book on Roswell, there is no known, credible explanation other than ET, in which case the government, which confiscated the evidence, knows plenty…Even the public has access to reports e.g. Socorro, in which the evidence for a landed object--for which there is, again, no prosaic explanation--is clear.there is no definitive evidence that UFOs are spaceships or that they are of alien origin.
But the phenomenon does want to be perceived as a threat. There have been "bad' incidents since 1953, or 1948--Mantell....UFOs are not a threat..
I've seen no evidence the government seized anything; and since ETIs are not proven to exist, using them as an "explanation" for ANYTHING is silly. And ignoring prosaic explanations doesn't make them vanish.No evidence that laymen are (fully) aware of…As KDR notes in his latest book on Roswell, there is no known, credible explanation other than ET, in which case the government, which confiscated the evidence, knows plenty…Even the public has access to reports e.g. Socorro, in which the evidence for a landed object--for which there is, again, no prosaic explanation--is clear.
Totally agree.I've seen no evidence the government seized anything; and since ETIs are not proven to exist, using them as an "explanation" for ANYTHING is silly. And ignoring prosaic explanations doesn't make them vanish.
So you're completely unfamiliar with Roswell witness testimony and that of others who noted the government took e.g. film.I've seen no evidence the government seized anything;
They are unproven to laymen; you can't assume the government, which took so much evidence, has no definitive proof…Btw we are "space aliens"--from the perspective of the rest of the Universe. All the ETH says is that life arose and evolved elsewhere just as it did here; the process just began earlier than on earth. Since it's highly likely ETs exist they're a perfectly plausible explanation. In view of the extraordinary nature of many reports, in many cases they're the best explanation if not the only one.and since ETIs are not proven to exist, using them as an "explanation" for ANYTHING is silly.
KDR did not ignore prosaic explanations(!) he exhaustively investigated them and proved them wrong.And ignoring prosaic explanations doesn't make them vanish.
I said EVIDENCE, not ANECDOTE. And was KDR's investigation completely unbiased?So you're completely unfamiliar with Roswell witness testimony and that of others who noted the government took e.g. film.
They are unproven to laymen; you can't assume the government, which took so much evidence, has no definitive proof…Btw we are "space aliens"--from the perspective of the rest of the Universe. All the ETH says is that life arose and evolved elsewhere just as it did here; the process just began earlier than on earth. Since it's highly likely ETs exist they're a perfectly plausible explanation. In view of the extraordinary nature of many reports, in many cases they're the best explanation if not the only one.
KDR did not ignore prosaic explanations(!) he exhaustively investigated them and proved them wrong.
How true. LolI forgot to mention that supposed aliens can't be used as explanations for the same reason supposed horses can't be ridden.
Witness testimony may not be conclusive proof but it is evidence. Many times KDR rejected UFO cases or certain reports because he didn't find them credible, and he has investigated Roswell more exhaustively than any other case.I said EVIDENCE, not ANECDOTE. And was KDR's investigation completely unbiased?
When there is no terrestrial explanation for a technical phenomenon--as has been repeatedly shown with regard to Roswell--and the phenomenon includes reports of humanoid or nonhuman beings, as well as technology, ET is the only reasonable explanation.I forgot to mention that supposed aliens can't be used as explanations for the same reason supposed horses can't be ridden.
It would be nice if the proof taken by government or military people were revealed….Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Anecdotes, even dressed up as "reports", won't do.
There are mundane means for radar reflectors to wind up in fields, so there IS a terrestrial explanation.
He's been showing up quite a bit in the past several decades, but the real proof isn't in the public domain.ET can't be an explanation until he shows up!
Do you have extraordinary proof that the USG took ANYTHING?It would be nice if the proof taken by government or military people were revealed….
UFOlogy or the ETH, is not based solely on witness testimony. Many cases are supported by physical evidence--landing marks, damage, injuries etc.
Try reading KDR's books or his blog… There was only one way enough stuff could've come down on the foster ranch and that is if a mogul array had crashed there. As KDR has shown, for many years, available documentation clearly shows this did not happen. Even if it might've, witness testimony indicates the material was extraordinary not mundane--i.e. not recognizable even to a base intel officer.
He's been showing up quite a bit in the past several decades, but the real proof isn't in the public domain.