What does that mean?
It means that, given the current lack of full comprehension of how quantum mechanics is integrated and effective in the evolution of the physical universe, you and I, like the physicists working in the quantum field, are not going to agree on its interpretation. So there's no point in arguing about interpretations still based in conflicting theories.
Are you continuing to assert that QM is required to explain the mind, and that every particle in the universe is entangled, or not?
I don't believe I've ever 'asserted' that qm is required to explain consciousness or mind; I've cited researchers who hypothesize that qm and quantum field theory are involved in brain activity and mental phenomena as in other phenomena (such as photosynthesis), and who are attempting to demonstrate how, through experiment and reasoning from that which is understood of quantum behavior at present. Re q entanglement, I haven't asserted that every particle in the universe is entangled with every other particle, but that q entanglement as a process of interactivity and interconnection in systems is thought by many physicists to extend throughout the universe and also beyond it.
I'm scratching my chin, sorry.
So are we all.