Randall
J. Randall Murphy
Transparency in the selection of therapeutic treatments: Where are the clinical trials of the tetracycline family (doxycycline) for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19?
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Chinese are spreading the virus in the West ?I also don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility that the trouble the West ( particularly the USA ) is having stomping it out is because there are CCP agents helping to spread it
To frame this correctly. This isn't my personal theory. I heard it expressed on some talk radio shows and a YouTube video [ EXAMPLE ], so I decided to see if anyone had discovered anything substantial to back it up. I found nothing indisputable. But that also doesn't mean the theory is ludicrous. You can find some of the background detailed elsewhere on this thread. Let's put them in point form:Chinese are spreading the virus in the West ?
Any shred of evidence for this ludicrous idea ?
And you think Farrell is 'on the fringe'?
This should probably be in the COVID-19 News section, and we can always move it there if it goes that way, but the key point in what you said for me, especially against the backdrop of COVID-19, is the word "peddling". That's because the science behind COVID-19 has become intensely politicized and is being "peddled" by politicians and medical experts alike in a manner that fits their agenda and modus operandi.... while peddling insane conspiracy theories instead of science ...
Yes they do and for those who don't care about themselves they should at least care for others.Actually social distancing and wearing a mask do help a lot.
Actually social distancing and wearing a mask do help a lot.
In high risk settings I have no problem with the taking precautions, but outside high risk settings like hospitals and long-term care for the elderly, the risk of mortality from covid-19 is less than dozens of other hazards, and doesn't justify bringing in mandatory masks, vaccinations, and fining groups of people thousands of dollars for being on a picnic, and YES it has been going on, to the tune of over 15 million dollars in fines here in Canada, not to mention putting literally millions of people into a state of abject poverty, the death toll from which may exceed that of COVID-19.Yes they do and for those who don't care about themselves they should at least care for others.
I think the governor of Texas, after his earlier lackadaisical attitude early on, now has it right. If a city has over a certain amount of positives, the mask and social distancing guidelines are mandated. Otherwise they aren't.In high risk settings I have no problem with the taking precautions, but outside high risk settings like hospitals and long-term care for the elderly, the risk of mortality from covid-19 is less than dozens of other hazards, and doesn't justify bringing in mandatory masks, vaccinations, and fining groups of people thousands of dollars for being on a picnic, and YES it has been going on, to the tune of over 15 million dollars in fines here in Canada, not to mention putting literally millions of people into a state of abject poverty, the death toll from which may exceed that of COVID-19.
Exactly. It's just a matter of perspective. I was listening to the radio the other day when someone who had done the math suggested that had the amount of financial loss due to the lockdowns been used to solve the problems of poverty, education, and medical care; not only could those problems have been solved, more lives would be saved, and the quality of life for the nation as a whole would have been improved.It's just a matter of perspective. Simple steps reduce infections and deaths, so why not follow them?
This should probably be in the COVID-19 News section, and we can always move it there if it goes that way, but the key point in what you said for me, especially against the backdrop of COVID-19, is the word "peddling". That's because the science behind COVID-19 has become intensely politicized and is being "peddled" by politicians and medical experts alike in a manner that fits their agenda and modus operandi.
We see the same sort of distorting of science when frackers say there's no "scientific proof" fracking causes the contamination of people's water supplies. As you know, I'm a big fan of science, but I'm not a big fan of deception, and unfortunately when politics and/or big business gets involved, science and deception can be used together to push personal, business, and political agendas, and COVID-19 is no different.
With COVID-19, the situation is a very complex, but as I've been saying from the start, we haven't been told everything about it all along, and we may never know everything. There are those that would call my opinions "crazy conspiracy" theories too, especially the CCP. But it's not only them that we need to be concerned about. The science of COVID-19 does not IMO justify the sweeping social, economic, and behavioral changes made by politicians.
In high risk settings I have no problem with the taking precautions, but outside high risk settings like hospitals and long-term care for the elderly, the risk of mortality from covid-19 is less than dozens of other hazards, and doesn't justify bringing in mandatory masks, vaccinations, and fining groups of people thousands of dollars for being on a picnic, and YES it has been going on, to the tune of over 15 million dollars in fines here in Canada, not to mention putting literally millions of people into a state of abject poverty, the death toll from which may exceed that of COVID-19.
I liked you post because I appreciate honest counterpoint. The part I'm wondering about is what you you don't "buy at all" when they're not simply matters of opinion. I'm actually a bit surprised, but perhaps when you consider the following:I love you man, but I don't buy that at all. It's shut down the world economy for months. For that reason alone it has a special status.
Masks don't hurt people. Limiting group sizes doesn't hurt people. We could already have fully reopened if people would take fairly simple and reasonable precautions.
I don't wear masks everywhere, but I do put one on when asked to do so. No big deal.