NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Grokl said:Think it would have been a bit better if the questions were answered directly instead of the "I know something ya'all dont know..." attitude.
Unfortunately, I think Mr Greer has no real evidence to show anybody really on anything these days.
To put it another way, it was a disservice to any new listeners or interested laypeople.
Paranormal Packrat said:To put it another way, it was a disservice to any new listeners or interested laypeople.
Um, Perhaps it was a show for the informed and not the layperson. Maybe the first time he was on, is more your speed. Perhaps? See, they were nice to him the first time. They caught shit. Now, they are too hard I guess.
CapnG said:The bit about Greer's mysterious team of non-scientists who really exist but can't be named... I can sorta see how that's legit. I mean suppose (just SUPPOSE) you actually had such a team, you'd want them to keep their heads waaaaay down until you had the means to properly protect them from the powers that be and set them up in a proper lab, wouldn't you? I think so. Annonymity requests on their part don't strike me as odd in the slightest. On the other hand for David to mention his friend (who for the record I'm certain exists... god Greer was being uber-dickish about that wasn't he?) but become flustered at the notion of revealing his identity seems a little pot-and-kettle. Realistically, NOBODY in the public sector needs to know who any of these people are. If there's real research to be done and real funds to do then I don't care what their names are, so long as they actually DO this shit.
sesteve said:Dudes .. I'm OUTOFHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RonCollins said:He has been spewing this crap for a decade or more. If you dont want to name them, then why bring them up?
IsoBan said:Our obsessions and compulsions as human beings are rooted in vastly magnified survival instinct, which any intelligent ( granted, biological ) life was likely also rooted in at first.
Scott Story said:I just listened to the show, but I haven't read all the posts that come before on this thread. I'm not a Greer fan, nor do I find him credidible.
But, and I will probably be banned from the forum, I was not impressed with this show for various reasons. First up, Greer came off as much professional sounding. David, and to a lesser extent Jeremy, came in looking for a fight.
If I had never heard of any of you, I would have come away from this interview feeling sympathetic for Greer. I know these are weighty, important matters for all involved, but it was poorly handled. I'm not going to pick apart David's approach, because I'm probably going to be attacked for stating my opinion by fellow board members.
I guess it's time for the Paracast to define it's role--Angry, righteous defenders of the search for truth; Or collegiate interviewers. It seems to me there is a middle ground you could aim for without becoming C2C.
This is worse than Boyd Bushman's episode. I don't care about Bushman or his claims, but all the "senior" scientist jibes that were made while barely repressing accusations did not convince me then or your even-handedness then, and this episode did not either.