Ron Collins
Curiously Confused
Wow, I don't understand the hostile undertones presented by some in this thread. I think it is a valid question. If you can imagine that an intelligence (from whatever origin you want to assign) is interested in humans then the internet is a treasure trove of information. Not only on ourselves, our history, our capabilities, and every other aspect of our being but also the factual data stored about our physical planet and its various species, weather, and geology.
The concept that "some intelligence" might be hacking into things is not at all out of the question. In fact it seems perfectly plausible to me. The goal of any hacker is to gain access to something undetected. The stuff you hear about on the news comes from anarchists and pranksters that then decide to vandalize sites/information. Or they do something stupid and get caught. Think Gary McKinnon. Good hackers do not get caught very often because they aren't jackasses. They want knowledge that others try to keep safely hidden.
The US government employs hackers that access computer systems of other governments, and sometimes private industry, daily to amass information they can then package into their daily intel product for policy maker consumption. Hackers have recently turned previously accepted climate theory on its ear with their release of previously secreted information. Why would an intelligence interested in learning about us or keeping tabs on us not utilize this tool? It seems absurd to assume that "they" would not.
Hell, one could reasonably argue that one reason for the apparent decrease in observed physical analytical activity on the part of UFO's and their occupants could be correlated with the advent and breadth of the information revolution. Essentially switching their analysis to combing through our various and sundry collections of data.
The concept that "some intelligence" might be hacking into things is not at all out of the question. In fact it seems perfectly plausible to me. The goal of any hacker is to gain access to something undetected. The stuff you hear about on the news comes from anarchists and pranksters that then decide to vandalize sites/information. Or they do something stupid and get caught. Think Gary McKinnon. Good hackers do not get caught very often because they aren't jackasses. They want knowledge that others try to keep safely hidden.
The US government employs hackers that access computer systems of other governments, and sometimes private industry, daily to amass information they can then package into their daily intel product for policy maker consumption. Hackers have recently turned previously accepted climate theory on its ear with their release of previously secreted information. Why would an intelligence interested in learning about us or keeping tabs on us not utilize this tool? It seems absurd to assume that "they" would not.
Hell, one could reasonably argue that one reason for the apparent decrease in observed physical analytical activity on the part of UFO's and their occupants could be correlated with the advent and breadth of the information revolution. Essentially switching their analysis to combing through our various and sundry collections of data.