• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Fascinating Old Chronoscopes - 1950's

Free episodes:

I believe there is non-human intelligent life occupying the same physical universe as us. I believe there a several varieties that have physical bodies like us. I believe that these beings have "visited" earth throughout history for a number of reasons:

Refuel
Investigate
Experiment
Curiosity

But that doesn't mean that advances in human tech haven't drawn wider interest or more visits.

The relationship between these beings and humans may be similar to the relationship between humans and dolphins. Mutual interest but inability to communicate. Both intelligent but one vastly more so. It's not a perfect analogy of course.

I believe this because there is nothing in Consensus Science indicating that this can't be the case. Indeed I believe that Consensus Science indicates that the existence of ET life is likely. I understand that Consensus Subjective Reality requires empirical evidence of a phenomena and thus rejects this idea. That's fine.

When humans conquered the globe, of course we began to think about frontiers and foreigners that might exist off planet. That doesn't mean they're not there.

I'd love to read about human conceptions of off world life prior to the 40s.

/speculation
 
I am in the bowels of old videos - no videos of television vintage before the 50's, of course, except archival film.

Transformers - power lines - what happened in the 1940's besides a nuclear bomb ignition? the electrification of the US. Electro-magnetism.

Here's an interesting archival footage on 'government power' - no profit making, a cooperative, minor fees - listen to how this was spoken about (in good faith by all) to the farmers and public in the 1930's.

HD Stock Footage Rural America Farm Family Gets Electricity

TEXT: "Power and the Land - Supplying Energy to Rural America Reel 3 - Portrays a farm family from St. Clairsville, Ohio who are members of an REA co-operative, and contrasts their life before and after electricity. More difficult tasks are done "the old way--the hard way" without electrical power. Agricultural co-operation is illustrated through corn cutting scenes set to music and poetry. Farmers meet with a county agent who explains the work of the REA (Rural Electrification Administration) and the need to form co-operatives. Map is used to show REA co-ops established between 1936 and 1940. Electrical lines are constructed taking power from the transmission lines to the individual farm houses. Shows a farm family using and enjoying electrical appliances such as electric lights, electric stove, a radio broadcasts the weather report. Farm life in the 1930's."
 
I believe there is non-human intelligent life occupying the same physical universe as us. I believe there a several varieties that have physical bodies like us.
I recall an anecdote told about an occult teacher at the beginning of the last century. At the end of one of his lectures, there was the usual Q&A. One of the questions was something along the lines of: is there intelligent life else where in the universe (though the exact wording I don't really recall - and I now realize it would be important to know the exact wording of the question). His response was interesting. He closed his eyes - or looked down - and was silent for an unusually long, a-typically long, space of time. Finally he gave his response, saying that he would not answer the question as his task on the earth was very specific and he would not deflect from that task by answering such a question. It's a significant non-answer from someone of considerable occult capacities imo. Gives one pause.
I believe that these beings have "visited" earth throughout history for a number of reasons:

Refuel
Investigate
Experiment
Curiosity

But that doesn't mean that advances in human tech haven't drawn wider interest or more visits.

Never say never, the saying goes. I respect your views but it's more to do with what one decides to spend one's energy on. Most 'radical' imaginations from out the past look quaint to us now. Few there are that stand the test of time, though some do for sure.

Refuel? What manner of (intergalactic) technology would need to 'refuel'? What manner of beings capable of such a traverse would be 'investigating', or 'experimenting' - or doing anything out of mere 'curiosity'? Dabbling aimlessly? There is a saying that I've come across - first heard it said in a film - something about some men see the world as it is, but most see it as they are. This is reminiscent of that. Any projection out into a supposed alien civilization is painfully obvious as a projection of who and what we are as humans now.

The relationship between these beings and humans may be similar to the relationship between humans and dolphins. Mutual interest but inability to communicate. Both intelligent but one vastly more so. It's not a perfect analogy of course.

There was a thread here that was lamenting how 'at an end' humanity is now. After 'all this time' look where we have brought ourselves. I see it as quite the reverse - humanity is very much at it's beginnings. IMO We are very primitive - our future is the long reach. A great occult teacher once said that humanity is the religion of the gods.

Yes, I, too, believe there is advanced intelligent life existing in the universe - but of a kind we cannot conceive. It makes sense that there would be. Humanity has known about these beings for always. It's only 'recently' - in the last few centuries - that humanity's memory has lapsed. Nomenclature becomes an issue and the arguments over the names of these beings is not worth the time. Communication with these other beings has taken place - but there are constraints.

But the idea that a being without the human's physical sense body would still exist in this human physical reality is an interesting possibility - but it seems unlikely. This plane of existence is the human-perceptual plane of existence. All who live as we do will be 'human' and look as we do. Is there an advanced 'human'? I think there is, but as the ancient text states: look on the moment when an individual is on the threshold of becoming 'more than man' with 'fear and trembling' (meaning 'respect'). I do believe that there are beings greater than humanity - more intelligent, more capable - but I do not believe there are beings that are merely a basic re-working of who we are currently as humans. [Take a gander over the science fiction in the early years of the genre - 'Astounding Stories', 'Amazing Stories', etc. - and you will see the world as it then was and the psychology of that time simply re-worked into other images to look 'alien'.

I believe this because there is nothing in Consensus Science indicating that this can't be the case. Indeed I believe that Consensus Science indicates that the existence of ET life is likely.

I've never heard of consensus science, though I can imagine what you mean.

I understand that Consensus Subjective Reality requires empirical evidence of a phenomena and thus rejects this idea. That's fine.

By 'Consensus Subjective Reality' do you mean a shared belief system?

When humans conquered the globe, of course we began to think about frontiers and foreigners that might exist off planet. That doesn't mean they're not there.

But why do they need to be there? Why do we posit them? And refuse the idea of angels and gods? It's a curious disjunct, to my mind.

I'd love to read about human conceptions of off world life prior to the 40s.

/speculation

There's lots of speculative fiction from the 1920's and 1930's. Sending rockets to the moon and meeting strange creatures was being ruminated upon quite early. In 1902 there was the amazing silent short film called 'A Trip to the Moon'. LINK: Le voyage dans la lune (1902) - IMDb in which 'A group of astronomers go on an expedition to the moon.' The 'men travel to the moon by being shot in a capsule from a giant cannon. They are captured by moon-men, escape, and return to the earth.'

BTW - speaking of electricity - the film has a connection to Thomas Edison: "After finishing work on the film, Georges Méliès intended to release it in America and thereby make lots of money. Unfortunately, Thomas A. Edison's film technicians had already secretly made copies of the film, which was shown across the USA within weeks. Melies never made any money from the film's American showings, and went broke several years later (while Edison made a fortune on the film)."

Here it is -


Here's the amazing hand-colored copy of the film that was found in a barn in France in 2000, restored and it's on YouTube! 1902!

 
Last edited:
I recall an anecdote told about an occult teacher at the beginning of the last century. At the end of one of his lectures, there was the usual Q&A. One of the questions was something along the lines of: is there intelligent life else where in the universe (though the exact wording I don't really recall - and I now realize it would be important to know the exact wording of the question). His response was interesting. He closed his eyes - or looked down - and was silent for an unusually long, a-typically long, space of time. Finally he gave his response, saying that he would not answer the question as his task on the earth was very specific and he would not deflect from that task by answering such a question. It's a significant non-answer from someone of considerable occult capacities imo. Gives one pause.

Yes, I, too, believe there is advanced intelligent life existing in the universe - but of a kind we cannot conceive. It makes sense that there would be. Humanity has known about these beings for always. It's only 'recently' - in the last few centuries - that humanity's memory has lapsed. Nomenclature becomes an issue and the arguments over the names of these beings is not worth the time. Communication with these other beings has taken place - but there are constraints.

But the idea that a being without the human's physical sense body would still exist in this human physical reality is an interesting possibility - but it seems unlikely. This plane of existence is the human-perceptual plane of existence. All who live as we do will be 'human' and look as we do. Is there an advanced 'human'? I think there is, but as the ancient text states: look on the moment when an individual is on the threshold of becoming 'more than man' with 'fear and trembling' (meaning 'respect'). I do believe that there are beings greater than humanity - more intelligent, more capable - but I do not believe there are beings that are merely a basic re-working of who we are currently as humans.
You mean demons?

I believe there is - for lack of a better term - disembodied intelligent life existing in our reality (if not our physical reality) as well. I believe this for similar reasons that I believe there is non-human, intelligent life with physical bodies: Because there is no reason to believe they couldn't exist, and imho it seems likely that they would.

In other words, I believe there are a variety of intelligent, non-human forms of life in our reality (both physical and perhaps non-physical). However, I have never had any experience/encounter with such an entity myself.

Refuel? What manner of (intergalactic) technology would need to 'refuel'? What manner of beings capable of such a traverse would be 'investigating', or 'experimenting' - or doing anything out of mere 'curiosity'? Dabbling aimlessly? There is a saying that I've come across - first heard it said in a film - something about some men see the world as it is, but most see it as they are. This is reminiscent of that. Any projection out into a supposed alien civilization is painfully obvious as a projection of who and what we are as humans now.
I think it's a mistake to be monistic in this regard: to contend that any intelligent, physical, non-human race that theoretically might exist must be omniscient.

Take us for example: We just recently tiptoed into the ocean of the cosmos (h/t Sagan) but haven't managed to make it back. If/when we visit another Earth-like planet, we will certainly refuel (if not our vessel, perhaps ourselves - if we have organic bodies, that is), investigate, explore, etc.

Also, who's to say that some of these theoretical visits to Earth aren't "teenagers" out for a spin on the backroads? Sure, it sounds ludicrous, but truth is always stranger than fiction.

Re: the dolphin analogy: Do you think that the dolphin population as a whole realizes that humans exist, that humans have some dolphins in captivity, and that we've been experimenting on and studying dolphins for years? No, dolphins as a whole don't know this, but we've been "blatantly" doing so for years. Again, not a perfect analogy, but the point I'm trying to make is that we must be careful not to suppose that the reason "aliens" have alluded us is because they are omniscient. We're certainly not and I've never heard of dolphins capturing a human. ;)

They may be closer to us than we suspect, but also further from us than we can comprehend.

My belief (which is probably too strong of a word) is that in our reality there exist a variety of extraterrestrial life forms; some of which are intelligent, some of which are not; some of which are disembodied; some of which are not; some of which are comparatively omniscient, some of which are not; etc.

There was a thread here that was lamenting how 'at an end' humanity is now. After 'all this time' look where we have brought ourselves. I see it as quite the reverse - humanity is very much at it's beginnings. IMO We are very primitive - our future is the long reach.
I don't disagree with this.

I've never heard of consensus science, though I can imagine what you mean.
As you know, Science is a dynamic, self-correcting process. At any given time, there is usually one model/theory per domain that a majority of scientists support via consensus. However, many other scientists may support competing models/theories. And finally, Consensus Science does not = Objective Reality.

By 'Consensus Subjective Reality' do you mean a shared belief system?
Yep, pretty much. "Common sense," culture, and stuff like that.

Soupie said: When humans conquered the globe, of course we began to think about frontiers and foreigners that might exist off planet. That doesn't mean they're not there.

But why do they need to be there? Why do we posit them?
For lack of a better term, I think it's in our DNA. We're animals after all. There's always a predator/outsider lurking around the corner or over the next mountain. And hasn't that always been the case for humans, at least according to Consensus Science? Homosapiens sapiens is top dog now, so we either fight over territory and resources with ourselves (which of course we do) or we look off world for new frontiers (territory, resources, and peoples to conquer and pillage).
 
Last edited:
You mean demons?

Not particularly. In general.

I believe there is - for lack of a better term - disembodied intelligent life existing in our reality (if not our physical reality) as well. I believe this for similar reasons that I believe there is non-human, intelligent life with physical bodies: Because there is no reason to believe they couldn't exist, and imho it seems likely that they would.

In other words, I believe there are a variety of intelligent, non-human forms of life in our reality (both physical and perhaps non-physical). However, I have never had any experience/encounter with such an entity myself.

Then why believe? Is it just that the idea 'makes sense'?

I think it's a mistake to be monistic in this regard: to contend that any intelligent, physical, non-human race that theoretically might exist must be omniscient.

You lost me here. Did I say they would be omniscient? Or must be? Did I? [P.S. Later: Very tired when I wrote this - but a genuine question - wondering how you got omniscience in there. :) ]

Take us for example: We just recently tiptoed into the ocean of the cosmos (h/t Sagan) but haven't managed to make it back. If/when we visit another Earth-like planet, we will certainly refuel (if not our vessel, perhaps ourselves - if we have organic bodies, that is), investigate, explore, etc.

This is what I mean - we project outward what we are in any given time. We assume the 'alien' will be like us in psychology and other ways.

Also, who's to say that some of these theoretical visits to Earth aren't "teenagers" out for a spin on the backroads? Sure, it sounds ludicrous, but truth is always stranger than fiction.

This was, in fact, the premise of a very funny, and well-known, science fiction short story way back in the stone age (the 60's, I think). Again, it is an example of 'us' projecting 'us' outward onto 'them'.

Re: the dolphin analogy: Do you think that the dolphin population as a whole realizes that humans exist, that humans have some dolphins in captivity, and that we've been experimenting on and studying dolphins for years? No, dolphins as a whole don't know this, but we've been "blatantly" doing so for years. Again, not a perfect analogy, but the point I'm trying to make is that we must be careful not to suppose that the reason "aliens" have eluded us is because they are omniscient. We're certainly not and I've never heard of dolphins capturing a human. ;)

Good points - but I never said aliens would be omniscient.

The last sentence pretty much says it all - there is a significant difference between human and animal.

They may be closer to us than we suspect, but also further from us than we can comprehend.

Yep - agree here 100%.

My belief (which is probably too strong of a word) is that in our reality there exist a variety of extraterrestrial life forms; some of which are intelligent, some of which are not; some of which are disembodied; some of which are not; some of which are comparatively omniscient, some of which are not; etc.

Could be - no problem here imo. Never say never, I say.

As you know, Science is a dynamic, self-correcting process. At any given time, there is usually one model/theory per domain that a majority of scientists support via consensus. However, many other scientists may support competing models/theories. And finally, Consensus Science does not = Objective Reality.

On the whole, I agree - though I don't see science as quite that monolith of 'consensus' as perhaps you do. Science is a mixed bag - mainly of egos.

Yep, pretty much. "Common sense," culture, and stuff like that.

Okay.
 
Last edited:
Then why believe? Is it just that the idea 'makes sense'?
Yes. Because it makes sense (to me) and because many imo credible people have reported sightings/encounters.

You lost me here. Did I say they would be omniscient? Or must be? … This is what I mean - we project outward what we are in any given time. We assume the 'alien' will be like us in psychology and other ways.
1) I believe I misunderstood you (see point 2). However, many people assume if an “alien” species is able to visit our planet that they will be so advanced that they will, for all intents and purposes, be omniscient. This will make them irreconcilably alien (heh) to us, and us to them, and they will have no need to explore, experiment, refuel, or be curious.

What I am suggesting is that there probably are alien species like this, essentially omniscient and therefore “beyond us” and our squishy organic and “petty” emotional ways. But I’m also suggesting that there probably are alien species that haven’t yet shed their organic bodies and/or their emotions.

The last sentence pretty much says it all - there is a significant difference between human and animal.
But perhaps not as great as you seem to be suggesting...

2) While the theoretical “disembodied” variety of aliens are probably very dissimilar from humans because of a) evolutionary distance, and/or b) different origin, it seems logical that some alien species will have arisen and evolved on their planets much as humans and other animals have here on ours.

While humans and other animals on Earth have many differences, we have many similarities as well: a drive to survive, reproduce, eat, explore, socialize, learn, have fun, etc.

Will all potential alien species have these same innate drives as humans? No. Will some? I believe it's possible.

Thus, I get the point that humans project themselves onto others (if horses had gods, they would look like horses, etc.), but… that does not mean some potential alien species - having had a similar origin and evolution as humans - may share similar psychological goals/drives as humans.
 
yep, they all have leg,'s [2] arms [2] heads [1] eye's [2] nose's [1] mouth's [1] in any sighting's, abduction's etc, so ergo, they must all evolve similar, from extraterrestrial apes, who evolved from extraterrestrial fish, i dont buy it.

that's why i dont buy sighting's, abduction, or port-hole viewing's, interesting as they are, i just dont buy it.
im a futuristic drone/robotic vehicle believer about nut's and bolt craft's, any intelligence with awareness of the self, is going to want to know if it's alone or not, and that self-awareness could be millions of years old, unlike human self-awareness..
 
Last edited:
From 1954 - though unclear when this interview happened.

UFO Encounter 1954 UK... A very credible eye witness!

TEXT: "Published on Mar 20, 2015: Jessie Roestenberg UFO sighting 1954. A very credible eye witness!"
 
A machine that could see into the past.....some real fun in this mocumentary......;)

The Chronoscope

TEXT: "Published on Nov 13, 2013: A documentary about a 1930s scientist who invented a machine that could see into the past."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top