So would I. I'm working on it.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Will hearing more he said vs somebody else said add anything to the debate?I think it would be interesting to have Peter Robbins on to hear in detail the problems he now has with Larry Warren's account of the Rendlesham Forest incident.
It would also be good to understand if his thoughts on Nick Pope's book have changed as a result.
I also think he's a compelling listen on all aspects of the UFO mystery and so called "abduction" phenomenon.
Will hearing more he said vs somebody else said add anything to the debate?
At the archives Håkan specializes in the personal and organizational files we keep from paranormal activists, groups and organizations.
They are a research repository.Does this individual or his organization state the reasons for doing this?
That's the plan. I'm working on scheduling with Peter.I doubt it, whether you're referring to the Rendelsham debate or the UFO debate as a whole. But I'd like to hear Gene interview Robbins to clear up which parts of Warren's testimony he now rejects and which he continues to support.
I'd like to hear the debate. The dream Paracast round table would be Halt, Pope, Robbins and the British sceptic Ian RidpathWill hearing more he said vs somebody else said add anything to the debate?
Hey I like Pope but I think he's added very little to our understanding of the event. Aside from documenting it in his book.I'd like to hear the debate. The dream Paracast round table would be Halt, Pope, Robbins and the British sceptic Ian Ridpath
That's a fair comment. I'd like to hear his thoughts on Peter Robbins' criticisms of his book if indeed they still stand.Hey I like Pope but I think he's added very little to our understanding of the event. Aside from documenting it in his book.
Thanks, Han but can you say a 'cold day in Hell'?
I have realised that it is hard for me to argue against something I don't understand.
You must know something, or be convinced of something, that I am not. Or vice versa.
I guess what I am trying to say is that my default reaction to 'channeling' etc is one of scepticism.
But one thing I know is that if you don't look you can't see, or maybe in this case, you can't hear unless you listen
What you believe or don't is no skin off my nose, and I realise I have not always been polite to you.
I think part of the reason for that was born of frustration on my part, because like I said I don't understand where you are coming from.
And I know very little about ET channeling because I invariably avoid the topic entirely (except this time of course )
Rather than me putting beliefs on you, I would rather hear what you actually think. That is why I made the suggestion.
But I also respect that you don't want to, so that is fine. Best wishes.
I guess what I am trying to say is that my default reaction to 'channeling' etc is one of scepticism.