Man Made Clouds

[pixelsmith]

I woke up saturday about 8:15 am and looked out the window. It was a spectacular nearly cloudless bright blue sky with one contrail trailing off into the distance. I went to make coffee and looked out the window on the north side of my house and saw a couple contrails forming a cross. I waited for the coffee to get done and poured a big cup to enjoy on my patio and grabbed my camera on the way out as I usually do and was surprised to find a sky already full of "persistent contrails" that were formed in the time it took for my coffee to brew. As I sat there plane after plane came from various directions and FILLED the sky in spectacular fashion. For 2 hours I sat and watched as planes turned a beautiful blue sky into a complete haze that nearly blocked out the sun. The contrails expanded more and more and at times looked a bit like cloud "waterfalls" and even caused a circular rainbow around the sun. I was amazed at the way these contrails morphed in those two hours.

 

[pixelsmith]

more...

 

[pixelsmith]

i took about 500 photos in 2 hours but will only post a few so you can see the progression of the cloud expansion.

 

[pixelsmith]

and a few more.. Quite a cloud show in just a couple hours time.

 

[Randall]

I've been watching jet aircraft since I was kid and there's no question in my mind that there are substantially different kinds of vapor trials left by some large jets these days. I've seen plenty of normal contrails, the kind that fade out as the aircraft moves along, but these "persistent contrails" that spread out and turn the whole sky white, followed by rain within a day or so are something else. And the rain doesn't feel right either. It's got a different smell and texture. Once upon a time I wouldn't hesitate to drink a glass of rainwater. Not anymore. Some days are better than others, but it doesn't take long before the trails return. This isn't a "chemtrail conspiracy" either. It's just an observation. Anyone can do it if they start looking up.

 

[pixelsmith]

Thanks for your comment ufology. We had rain the next day as well.

 

[pixelsmith]

I find it strange that there has been only one comment on this series of photos. Does everyone really think this is normal?

 

[Randall]

I find it strange that there has been only one comment on this series of photos. Does everyone really think this is normal?

It's a bit curious to me also because it's so blatantly obvious. But then again, I'm in my mid 50s now, and I remember when the sky was clear azure without that white background haze and there were none of these persistent contrails. I used to ride my bicycle up to the airport on my days off school and watch airplanes all day. Other days I'd lie on my back in the cemetery across the street ( yes I was a weird then too ) and watch the clouds and jets. So I've had the benefit of decades of personal observation to see how things have changed.

In contrast, these days we have a generation of young people who seldom have bothered to go out side and actually look at the sky because they've spent their whole lives in front of the TV or a game console, and even if they did go outside and start looking, they've got no experience to compare it to what it was like before all this started. So they go look it up on the Internet and end up on some reptilian chemtrail conspiracy website that makes anyone who questions what's going on look like they've got a screw loose.

The best point I've seen recently on this issue is that someone said rhetorically, to paraphrase: "What difference does it make whether or not it's part of some weather modification conspiracy? They're still filling the sky with whatever they are, the evidence is right before our eyes, and we should be more concerned than we are."

 

[pixelsmith]

wtf is wrong with people that they can't see these jet contrails are not normal?

 

[Randall]

wtf is wrong with people that they can't see these jet contrails are not normal?

I think that I offered a pretty good explanation in my last post. Most people don't know what "normal" is supposed to look like. They have no frame of reference compared to decades past, and if they even bother to look up, they think they're just normal harmless contrails of water vapor, not realizing that even if it is only pure water vapor ( which is doubtful ), that water vapor is a far more efficient greenhouse gas than all the other pollutants that global warming activists focus on, and it's being deposited directly into the upper atmosphere!

If you're into this in a bigger way than I am, get yourself an HD video camera with a telephoto lens and optical image stabilization and start monitoring aircraft with one of those phone apps. I heard there's one where you can just point your phone at an aircraft flying over and it's supposed to give you the flight number.

At some point you'll catch an aircraft at a certain altitude and location without a contrail and then one of these other types that leave these persistent contrails, sometimes even lower in the atmosphere where no contrail should form. I've seen them visually, but always randomly. One thing to check on is what kind of fuel these aircraft are burning. Some aircraft are now burning a combination of vegetable oil and jet fuel. That might explain the greasy feel of some of the snow and rain.

 

[pixelsmith]

I agree with you, people just don't know any better.

No, I will not be getting all fancy with equipment and I don't even own a smart phone.

 

[Han]

I have to be honest and say my mind is already made up, that there is not a global conspiracy regarding "chemtrails".
I do have a few questions
(1) What type of aeroplanes are being used to spray "chemtrails" more specifically are passenger jets "converted" or adapted to spray the alleged chemicals? or are there special "chemtrail" specialised aircraft?
(2) Why has (to my knowledge) an amateur pilot not collected "samples" as evidence. i.e flown into a "persistent" chemtrail and collected samples?
(3) Why has (to my knowledge) a "whistle blower" not come forward? specifically a pilot who has flown a "chemtrail" mission. (unless you think that the spraying system is automated or controlled from the ground meaning the pilot has no knowledge of the "spraying"?)

I would like to add that I have seen contrails since I was a small child in the 1980s (I live on one of the busiest flight paths in the world) and have a strong early memory of comparing a plane and its contrail to a Biro pen. Obviously I can not compare now to before I was born, but I have not noticed any difference in contrails since about 1985 or so when I took interest in aeroplanes.

My personal opinion is that whether you see contrails/chemtrails depends on atmospheric conditions like temperature, wind and moisture, especially when it comes to "persistent" contrails.

Even though I do not see evidence of "chemtrails" I did enjoy looking at your photographs.

best wishes

 

[GeoShift]

Han, check out these videos to get an idea of what is going on with the geo engineering.

 

[Randall]

I have to be honest and say my mind is already made up, that there is not a global conspiracy regarding "chemtrails".
I do have a few questions
(1) What type of aeroplanes are being used to spray "chemtrails" more specifically are passenger jets "converted" or adapted to spray the alleged chemicals? or are there special "chemtrail" specialised aircraft?
(2) Why has (to my knowledge) an amateur pilot not collected "samples" as evidence. i.e flown into a "persistent" chemtrail and collected samples?
(3) Why has (to my knowledge) a "whistle blower" not come forward? specifically a pilot who has flown a "chemtrail" mission. (unless you think that the spraying system is automated or controlled from the ground meaning the pilot has no knowledge of the "spraying"?)

I would like to add that I have seen contrails since I was a small child in the 1980s (I live on one of the busiest flight paths in the world) and have a strong early memory of comparing a plane and its contrail to a Biro pen. Obviously I can not compare now to before I was born, but I have not noticed any difference in contrails since about 1985 or so when I took interest in aeroplanes.

My personal opinion is that whether you see contrails/chemtrails depends on atmospheric conditions like temperature, wind and moisture, especially when it comes to "persistent" contrails.

Even though I do not see evidence of "chemtrails" I did enjoy looking at your photographs.

best wishes

Just keep watching. You sound smart enough to figure this out. Just set aside the "conspiracy theory" and start watching the different vapor trails. If the same thing is happening where you are, the "persistent ones" will coat the sky, turn into cloud cover, and often turn into precipitation within a few days, while the other ones that fade out normally don't. On some days you'll see both types within a short period of time in the same area. It's also a scientific fact that water vapor is a far more efficient greenhouse gas than all the other pollutants that global warming activists focus on, so even if these persistent vapor trails aren't actually the so-called "chemtrails", it's still being deposited directly into the upper atmosphere where it contributes more effectively to the greenhouse-gas effect than anything else cited as the cause of global warming. So why is this important factor seldom mentioned, or downplayed, and left out of the carbon trading scheme? It's as if somebody might not want airline companies to have to start paying carbon credits or something?

 

[flipper]

I find it strange that there has been only one comment on this series of photos. Does everyone really think this is normal?

Thank you pixelsmith for this opportunity to write about my observations and how I interpret them.

About ten years ago a friend said they were really spraying the chemtrails last weekend. I began to look and since then have been seeing the same pattern of cloud formation that you took pictures of from your patio. But I have seen other things in the past ten years. I have seen a black line project out from a plane. I say plane because that is what it looked like.

Sometimes you can see the plane and not hear it. Sometimes you can hear the plane and not see it. Sometimes when they are not spraying they look like discs. I have seen dark strips in the sky were they have sprayed. I have watched the mist clouds from rain clouds.


In my search for answers I turned to the Internet. I found videos by Rod Hilderman. There were lots of them. He explained what camera he used. In one video he had on You Tube the wing changed positions within one frame. Then one day he took all his videos off the Internet. I found one after that he had not succeeded in withdrawing from a blog site. In it he said that he had been photographing a chemtrailer and it came back and flew over him very low. The following video was posted later by someone else.

Here are some other resources for you:

Chemtrails. The Realities of Geoengineering and Weather Modification | Global Research

I think that the agenda here is not human. There is likely some military planes involved but they are not working for the betterment of mankind. Dean Koontz has a novel where strange rain starts to fall and then strange plants show up and nothing is friendly to humans.

 

[pixelsmith]

I have to be honest and say my mind is already made up, that there is not a global conspiracy regarding "chemtrails".
I do have a few questions
(1) What type of aeroplanes are being used to spray "chemtrails" more specifically are passenger jets "converted" or adapted to spray the alleged chemicals? or are there special "chemtrail" specialised aircraft?
(2) Why has (to my knowledge) an amateur pilot not collected "samples" as evidence. i.e flown into a "persistent" chemtrail and collected samples?
(3) Why has (to my knowledge) a "whistle blower" not come forward? specifically a pilot who has flown a "chemtrail" mission. (unless you think that the spraying system is automated or controlled from the ground meaning the pilot has no knowledge of the "spraying"?)

I would like to add that I have seen contrails since I was a small child in the 1980s (I live on one of the busiest flight paths in the world) and have a strong early memory of comparing a plane and its contrail to a Biro pen. Obviously I can not compare now to before I was born, but I have not noticed any difference in contrails since about 1985 or so when I took interest in aeroplanes.

My personal opinion is that whether you see contrails/chemtrails depends on atmospheric conditions like temperature, wind and moisture, especially when it comes to "persistent" contrails.

Even though I do not see evidence of "chemtrails" I did enjoy looking at your photographs.

best wishes

Thanks for your post Han. I have been observing contrails for about 20 years longer than you and I DO notice a difference in contrails generated between 1960's and today.
I agree that normal contrails can differ depending on atmospheric conditions like temperature, wind and moisture.
Samples from contrail fallout, admissions from politicians and the 100+ patents on weather modification techniques and apparatus have proven these "chemtrails" exist.

 

[Han]

Han, check out these videos to get an idea of what is going on with the geo engineering.

I saw this back in 2010 here is what I felt after watching it (copied from thread Funny Chem trail video | Page 3 | The Paracast Community Forums)

Thanks for the video I have just watched it all and made the following observations:

In the film "karen johnson" links Aluminium oxide with Alzheimer's disease, having had my grandfather suffer from this horrible disease I know that there is no proven link with Aluminium. [my grandmother threw away all her Aluminium pots and pans and felt guilty untill she was assured by my Uncle, a scientist that it was not linked.)

There is a dentist called "Dr James Rota" who comments on Aluminium oxide, he forgot to mention that he must of placed Aluminium oxide literally thousands of times into the mouths of his patients, because that is what porcelain fillings, crowns and Bridges are made of.

The credibility of the whole programme was called into question to my mind when (1) "Peter Vereeke" started talking about entities (space brothers) (2) a 17 year old "Sofia Xenidis" said she was afraid of "being infected with Cancer"[Cancer is not infectious] (3) There where constant references to "God". (4) In part six [youtube version] they harrased senators and were suprised that they were avoided. (5) they used "scary" music when stating information.

I also noticed that they (film makers) travelled by Plane alot! and did not mention that Contrails do not require a Jet engined Plane, or that Air travel has increased continuously since it began, in short there are more planes flying now than ever before so there for more Contrails.

There was also no mention of catalytic converters on Cars [made of aluminium oxide].

For me the killer blow is that "Sunscreen" or "Suncreams" [for use on the body i.e at the beach] are comonly made of Aluminium oxide . It still feels like some body (probably a chemistry student) is laughing every time some one buys into the "Chemtrail"/Crop Spraying myth.

Having said all of that the documentary did raise some new (to me) concerns about changes in soil PH and levels of Borium contamination. However I feel that there are more likely causes than "Chemtrails" and the "New World Order".

and yes I do love {[(brackets)]} and am not very good at capital letters regards Harry
Peace and love Harry A Newton
Han, Oct 27, 2010

 

[Han]

RE: Real planes don't shapeshift - UFO fake planes do video:

I am very far from a video expert but the "shapeshifting" effect can easily be explained by "interlacing" of the video frames, especially when you consider that: as the plane was flying it had to have been travelling at "high speed" (relative to the camera).

 

[Han]

Thanks for your post Han. I have been observing contrails for about 20 years longer than you and I DO notice a difference in contrails generated between 1960's and today.
I agree that normal contrails can differ depending on atmospheric conditions like temperature, wind and moisture.
Samples from contrail fallout, admissions from politicians and the 100+ patents on weather modification techniques and apparatus have proven these "chemtrails" exist.

I have to concede that if the spaying of "chemtrails" started before I was born: then my "normal" (for lack of a better word) would include "chemtrails".
What I am left thinking is that IF "chemtrails" are being sprayed, then the "anti-chemtrail" movement better start to get its act together, and stop moving goal posts. What I am trying to say is that the more they (chemtrails) are associated with for example a NWO, mind control, population control, space brothers, UFO's and shapeshifting (rightly or wrongly) the less likely people (especially scientists) are to take any genuine underlying evidence seriously.

I have to say that Pixelsmith has been consistant in saying that they are to do with "geo-enginearing" but I have seen people try to link every conspiracy and phenomena imaginable to "chemtrails"resulting in me being extremely sceptical about the issue.

 

[pixelsmith]

I wish I would have got outside and took a few pics just 45 minutes earlier and the sky would have been cloud and contrail free. Then you could see the remarkable expansion of these contrails in a 3 hour window.