allengreenfield said:
the entirely mechanical method of 'prediction' I am talking about (it is pure cipher - no occult aspect internal to it)
I didn't realize you were going to be back on so soon. I have immensely enjoyed the previous episodes with you. If I had realized that you were going to show up so often I would be more active in posting questions in the Question Bank forum.
Thank you kindly!
One question I had that I wish had been explored more was something you mentioned in one of the previous shows, that being a statement that was something to the effect that certain people in occult circles warned you to stop drawing the connection between ufos and the occult. I would very much like to hear some expansion on this subject.
1. I'm not asking for names but can you generally relate something about who did the warning? Was this leadership of a specific organized Western tradition group?
Yes. It was the current OHO of the c OTO which later expelled me.
2. Can you comment on what you believe the motivation for the warning was? What do you feel they believed would be the consequences of exploring a link?
The reason given was that it would "be bad for my reputation as a writer" - this from an occultist. The real reason may have been something more sinister, as the connection between, say, Aleister Crowley's contact "Lam" and the much later grey aliens is obvious, and their is an undercurrent of the Sirius Mystery in OTO secret ritual and that of predecessor rites. The Oannes (aquatic being from Sirius as in Robert Temple's The Sirius Mystery) in the pivotal III Degree OTO ritual. I was, btw, a much decorated high degree member when expelled for speaking my mind in public.
3. Can you comment on what those doing the warning believe to be the case regarding ufos? For example, where in their worldview do ufos fit and do they ascribe them as a manifestation of some particular source? Is there any form of internal, current consensus in those circles as to the origin and nature of ufo phenomena?
Most middle and upper level occultists are hard-core debunkers, for unclear reasons. I address this in Secret Rituals of the Men in Black. The bulk of the members are in the third triad (outer) and many are pro-UFO and see no conflict between the subjects.
4. As you have asked people to try the cipher themselves, I bought both of the books and have. Are you still actually using the DOS version of Lexicon or is there some updated tool w/ a less awkward interface?
There is a more up to date tool--you might try Gerald del Campo's Cipher 2000 at
http://www.geocities.com/solis93/cipher.html
who I think wrote the program. I no longer use Lexicon, but do manual conversions. There is a dictionary of conversions from Luxor Press by John Crow that is handy for looking up word values in NAEQ.
See the Wiki piece at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Aeon_English_Qabala
thanks