• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

"Mutilated cow creepy, suspicious"

Free episodes:

Isn't it hard not to take the opinions of professional ranchers, many who are from ranching families with a great deal of experience with livestock and predators, seriously when they describe these things as not fitting the behavior of predators or disease. I have spoken to at least one person personally who witnessed the aftermath of such a mutilation. It was their option that what they saw (which was a classic mutilation) did not fit anything they had seen previously and it even puzzled the more experienced people here also.

The physical evidence that has been found and reported by Valdez and Gomez seems to suggest that some well funded organization was and probably still is conducting a study of animals raised in specific regions. This suggests that they may be studying the transmission of toxic materials from the environment (I think it is most likely radioactive contaminants) into the food chain among other things. The clandestine methodology seems to indicate that the nature of the study is viewed as so sensitive and important that illegal or extra-constitutional means are justified. The presence of radar chaff, glow sticks, gas masks, listening devices, other manufactured objects, and helicopters say to me that human beings are doing the cattle mutilations for very earthly reasons and not something else. This may not be the work of a governmental agency but rather a privatized compartmentalized extension of some program instigated by one.

I think Edmund Gomez might be right in that technological advances over the past 30 years should have allowed the perpetrators to get whatever they were after by a more effective means by now. Having said that, mutilations are still reported to occur in more or less the same manner if not with the same frequency as in the past.

It is truly a mystery and for the people directly effected by it a very serious mystery indeed. I think when Mr. Gomez finally gets around to publishing his book on his families experiences with cattle mutilations and the Valdez investigation it will be an interesting read.
 
I'm posting before I start work today. Which means my office pc blocks out some images. So, I can't tell if my own link worked or not. :confused: I'll have to check once I get home this evening. Oh well, time to start earning my bread. :cool:

She dinna work! Arrrrgg! Fortunately the link shows up so folks can highlight and search to get there. Matthew Williams is probably the most vocal and forthcoming of the crop circle makers. He has done a lot to expose dishonest crop circle researchers and to document the true history of crop circles than anyone else I know.

I gave up on taking Strieber that seriously years ago. He is pure entertainment to me however. I have read most of the guys books and enjoyed every single one of them. I would not hesitate to recommend him as entertainment to anyone interested in the paranormal, UFOs, or aliens.
 
I thought the Gomez interview came across as too cogent and credible for comfort. He sounds quite credible, at any rate. Ranchers are indeed familiar with the health and behavioral habits of their livestock and the ecology around them. They have to be.
 
And again if they were using The clandestine methodology , we wouldnt even be talking about it.
They could simply purchase the cattle they need for far less money and a lot less risk of detection.
The very fact that we are even talking about the stuff thats been left behind, is more indicative of a desire to be noticed than a clandestine methodology

The radar chaff is almost funny, what need would you have for radar chaff when stealing a cow ?
It could almost be an inside joke, bury the few grains of wheat with lots of chaff........

If the purpose is to secretly test cattle, its far easier and less suspicious to simply purchase the cattle and load em onto a truck, than turn up in the dead of night with a helicopter.

There is nothing clandestine about whats being done.

The very fact we are even talking about the stuff thats been "left behind" is more likely imo to be the intent behind doing so.
 
Back
Top