trainedobserver
Paranormally Disenchanted
Isn't it hard not to take the opinions of professional ranchers, many who are from ranching families with a great deal of experience with livestock and predators, seriously when they describe these things as not fitting the behavior of predators or disease. I have spoken to at least one person personally who witnessed the aftermath of such a mutilation. It was their option that what they saw (which was a classic mutilation) did not fit anything they had seen previously and it even puzzled the more experienced people here also.
The physical evidence that has been found and reported by Valdez and Gomez seems to suggest that some well funded organization was and probably still is conducting a study of animals raised in specific regions. This suggests that they may be studying the transmission of toxic materials from the environment (I think it is most likely radioactive contaminants) into the food chain among other things. The clandestine methodology seems to indicate that the nature of the study is viewed as so sensitive and important that illegal or extra-constitutional means are justified. The presence of radar chaff, glow sticks, gas masks, listening devices, other manufactured objects, and helicopters say to me that human beings are doing the cattle mutilations for very earthly reasons and not something else. This may not be the work of a governmental agency but rather a privatized compartmentalized extension of some program instigated by one.
I think Edmund Gomez might be right in that technological advances over the past 30 years should have allowed the perpetrators to get whatever they were after by a more effective means by now. Having said that, mutilations are still reported to occur in more or less the same manner if not with the same frequency as in the past.
It is truly a mystery and for the people directly effected by it a very serious mystery indeed. I think when Mr. Gomez finally gets around to publishing his book on his families experiences with cattle mutilations and the Valdez investigation it will be an interesting read.
The physical evidence that has been found and reported by Valdez and Gomez seems to suggest that some well funded organization was and probably still is conducting a study of animals raised in specific regions. This suggests that they may be studying the transmission of toxic materials from the environment (I think it is most likely radioactive contaminants) into the food chain among other things. The clandestine methodology seems to indicate that the nature of the study is viewed as so sensitive and important that illegal or extra-constitutional means are justified. The presence of radar chaff, glow sticks, gas masks, listening devices, other manufactured objects, and helicopters say to me that human beings are doing the cattle mutilations for very earthly reasons and not something else. This may not be the work of a governmental agency but rather a privatized compartmentalized extension of some program instigated by one.
I think Edmund Gomez might be right in that technological advances over the past 30 years should have allowed the perpetrators to get whatever they were after by a more effective means by now. Having said that, mutilations are still reported to occur in more or less the same manner if not with the same frequency as in the past.
It is truly a mystery and for the people directly effected by it a very serious mystery indeed. I think when Mr. Gomez finally gets around to publishing his book on his families experiences with cattle mutilations and the Valdez investigation it will be an interesting read.