Drama is not reality, it is an art.
The arts should be free from outside interference.
The most skilled actor or the one most suited to the role should be given it.
Gender should not be an issue, or race etc, it should be about merit.
My understanding is that this will be a new series of Dr who, not a remake of an old one, so I trust that the writers had written Who's player as being female.
We are talking about a very seasoned, experienced and successful production, at least give them a chance to show that it can work.
It is also probably worth noting that it is made for the BBC:
BBC - Embracing diversity in everything we do - Diversity & Inclusion
Anyway invariably the 'commissioner' (the person who orders/pays for a new work of art) will have certain stipulations or specifications for the artist.
For example if I ask an artist to paint me a donkey, and he paints me a horse, I am not going to pay.
The BBC has a very clear policy and the result is a female Dr, because that is what they want. It is up to the production to make it work.
We have to pay for a TV license here so in a way I have payed for Dr Who, even though I never watch it.
The BBC is such an important and influential organisation that I think it is imperative that it lights the way, of course this will mean errors and mistakes are made.
But I really do believe that it is the thought that counts, and I don't begrudge the BBC for trying to be progressive.
I think in time things will level out, and the cream will rise to the top, like it always does, but that can't happen until everyone is given an equal shot.
I trust Auntie. I suppose you can choose your friends but not your family
Also maybe I am not so bothered about who plays the Dr because I am not a fan. I wish they had given the funding to red dwarf instead, but that is another story, and this is supposed to be an 'officially funny thread' and not a place for soapbox rants. so here is my attempt at reworking an old joke:
Knock, knock.
Who is there?
A female Doctor:
A female Doctor Who?
Yep!