NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
If he does then MIT and Boston College got some 'splannin to do.Let's ask him to "produce" the Degree. If the prez can produce his Birth certificate then surely Dr. Phil can produce his degree. If this happens some of y'all got a lot of splainin to do. Of course if he doesn't then I guess another one bites the dust.
I've noticed that the sceptics on here...start frothing at the mouth like rabid dogs ready to do a "CUJO" on anyone and everything that they can explain away. I happen to be a sceptic who would likes the proof, however sometimes science can't explain everything, how arrogant of us to believe we know everything there is out there in the universe, we're like fish in a pond looking out at the sky and thinking surely there is nothing else to see or do because we can't see beyond our little existence. It's easy to focus on the prosaic aspects of an argument and focus on the things you can easily explain or explain away.
I don't know what the forum etiquette is on the paracast forum can I substitute letters of profane words??? anyway here I go, I apologise if I have offended anyone in advance.......
I heard a saying recently...
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves."[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
Anyone of us can be a keyboard warrior, until we get out there and experience what these people have...well????
I've noticed that the sceptics on here...start frothing at the mouth like rabid dogs ready to do a "CUJO" on anyone and everything that they can explain away. I happen to be a sceptic who would like the proof of the unknown, however sometimes science can't explain everything, how arrogant of us to believe we know everything there is out there in the universe, we're like fish in a pond looking out at the sky and thinking surely there is nothing else to see or do because we can't see beyond our little existence. It's easy to focus on the prosaic aspects of an argument and focus on the things you can easily explain or explain away.
I don't know what the forum etiquette is on the paracast forum can I substitute letters of profane words??? anyway here I go, I apologise if I have offended anyone in advance.......
I heard a saying recently...
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves."
[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
Anyone of us can be a keyboard warrior, until we get out there and experience what these people have...well????
Anyone of us can be a keyboard warrior, until we get out there and experience what these people have...well????
And why would anyone have a degree sealed, if such a thing existed? Need to know? Preposterous!
I have never heard of a sealed degree and I have worked at a University for 10 years, the last 8 of those in the Registrar's Office. I know pretty much everything there is to know about post secondary education, both North American and International. I verify degree for people that contact us to check and I authenticate transcripts that are submitted as part of the admissions process. I'm pretty sure why Lance came to me first when he thought of looking into Imbrogno's degree.And why would anyone have a degree sealed, if such a thing existed? Need to know? Preposterous!
That claim has been verified as utter nonsense by at least two people who deal in such matters on a daily basis. I think Ron said the lady laughed out loud over the phone. Angelo squirted coffee out of his nose. There's your unintended consequences for you.
no offence taken buddy theres a lot more knowledgeable people on here than i certainly am but this very topic of ufology has being so full of quacks and nutcases down the decades it just goes with the territory which itself makes it so hard to get to grips with. the likes of youtube and the thousands of CGI'S and fakes make it even harder to fathom the reality of it all. im bloody more confused the more i look into all of this to be honest.For those who think we should just "move along" I'd point out the hundreds of threads dealing with other subjects on this forum. The subject of how Ufology and Ufological history is impacted by this incident is far from being adequately explored and discussed. This has far reaching and wide ranging implications that must make the pretenders, hoaxers, and fakers in the paranormal field pretty damn uncomfortable I imagine. This too will become evident in their reaction to these developments. It's far from over in its implications and ramifications to Ufology.
Welcome to the forum Paul. I wasn't picking on you.
yep research the researchers then let them say there piece if they check out, but shouldn't that be the first thing to do anyway ? hell i could just read up via google then give mr noory a call and before long " paul reddington expert ufology researcher with a google search PHD coming soon on coasttocoast am".The onus is on Imbrogno to prove these outlandish claims. The people who are repeating that crap need to ask the sensible question, "Prove it!"
Maybe it's time to look at the credentials of other UFO researchers?
I don't offer any credentials; I have none.