It's a very simple story. Trump decided he wouldn't accept his loss by a landslide in the 2020 election, and hatched a plot to say in office. The insurrection was a part of the plot. Period.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Of course it was and he did not care one bit about those who are so stupid that they followed him blindly.It's a very simple story. Trump decided he wouldn't accept his loss by a landslide in the 2020 election, and hatched a plot to say in office. The insurrection was a part of the plot. Period.
This is a monster who should be taken away and tried for murder.Okay — you guys just keeping believing that.
Fantastic news.We knew it was coming:
Trump Indicted in New York: Donald Trump Is Indicted in New York (Published 2023)
Mr. Trump will be the first former president to face criminal charges. The precise charges are not yet known, but the case is focused on a hush-money payment to a porn star during his 2016 campaign.www.nytimes.com
No I did not but that's good cultural quiz knowledge.Speaking of Republicans, did you know the guy who did most of the Law & Order show intros is a former Republican legislator from Maine:
Steven Zirnkilton - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Not this nut case Randall. We have him to the US because we wanted rid of him just like David Icke. However Wednesday week I will not be at work but in Belfast city centre listening to a speech from the 46th president of the USA.Despite repeated claims he’s lowering drug prices, Joe Biden’s administration is refusing to force the manufacturer of a lifesaving prostate cancer drug developed completely with public funds to lower its nearly $190,000 annual price tag.
Name calling and pejoratives are not valid counterpoint. Again, neither of you watched the video, because you haven't had time to since I posted it. However if you're serious, how about we take actual examples e.g. that members of Congress are also invested in the companies that lobby them to keep them from making changes that would affect meaningful life saving changes at the expense of their profits — Gee only a "nut case" would think that there's something wrong with thatNot this nut case Randall. We have him to the US because we wanted rid of him just like David Icke. However Wednesday week I will not be at work but in Belfast city centre listening to a speech from the 46th president of the USA.
Gene, I'm sure your "fact checking" will reveal exactly what you want it to ( like it always does ) — because if it doesn't then you just deny it, reject it, or censor it.It's unfortunate that so much of the posts here focus on false claims, or total misunderstandings of how things work. A short search on Google can clear up such things. So I spend much of my time in this thread fact-checking rather than discussing the core issues of philosophy and policies.
Randall are you aware we never went to the moon.?Gene, I'm sure your "fact checking" will reveal exactly what you want it to ( like it always does ) — because if it doesn't then you just deny it, reject it, or censor it.
You are totally wrong. All of it. How the U.S. healthcare system works and the limits of Presidential powers are well known. But you have your head in the fringe quicksand and don't realize it.Gene, I'm sure your "fact checking" will reveal exactly what you want it to ( like it always does ) — because if it doesn't then you just deny it, reject it, or censor it.
I didn't call you names. I gave you facts that you can easily verify.Name calling and pejoratives are not valid counterpoint. Again, neither of you watched the video, because you haven't had time to since I posted it. However if you're serious, how about we take actual examples e.g. that members of Congress are also invested in the companies that lobby them to keep them from making changes that would affect meaningful life saving changes at the expense of their profits — Gee only a "nut case" would think that there's something wrong with that