• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter pixelsmith
  • Start date Start date

Free episodes:

Respect?
Why, by the way, should religions be above criticism? Everything else in this world can be subjected to criticism and scrutinized scientifically, but religion. When religion enters the room one is supposed to respectfully recede and shut up. But why on earth should one at all show respect for redundant old absurd delusions? Especially religious delusions which teach that all non-believers deserve to be tortured in all eternity have no demand whatsoever of respect from anybody. That kind of perverse delusions deserves only contempt!

Proof of God
 
The idea, if someone is having a different made up belief system than your own made up belief, this is a crime punishable by death. Especially, to have a different fantasy friend in the sky is a sufficient reason to kill them. An amusing twist is that Christians and Moslems often see each other as infidels, but are in fact sharing the very same God, which they of course both stole from the Jews (who also are infidels in their eyes). Oh well, if you just are religious enough, such details are obviously of no importance.

Dumbing down the population. Keeping the population down in ignorance and encouraging superstitious thinking. The religion’s dominant role in society through centuries has produced a general population who is illiterates when it comes to critical thinking, and are thus receptable for any kind of silly woo-woo notions and quack medicine. A population in which childish and comical superstitious ideas are taken seriously and thrives, thanks to public endorsed indoctrination in schools, media and public life.

Gift of Religion

On the positive side, religion has been a never ending source of crazy ideas, absurd stories, comical ceremonies and hocus-pocus, and hordes of ridiculous self righteous, pompous believers crawling like scared abused dogs for their imaginary master goblin in the sky. This is all things we could be rolling on the floor laughing about, hadn’t it been for all those millions of lives lost to religious crusades, inquisitions, wars, torture etc up through the last two millennia, giving the laughter a bad aftertaste in the mouth.
 
What is the main ethic contributions of the Bible??
A lot of people think that our western ethic and moral values are based on Christianity and the Bible. And without this glorious and holy heritage we all would be immoral and unethical perverts. This is of course rubbish and a product of 1700 years of the church's biased propaganda of itself and it's outdated teachings. Our western culture is of course not unaffected of the Christian Church's total religious domination the last 1700 years, but in fact, most of what we call human rights and values are based on ideas and philosophy from Antiquity (mostly Greek and Roman) forming the base for the human ideals developed in the Renaissance period.

These ideas were finally formulated in the Declaration of Human Rights after the French Revolution, at a time when Europe gradually had liberated itself from the religious medieval legislation and the Church's negative view of man and nature.

This humanization of legislation and society happened against the Church's will, not because of it. In fact, the Church has always tried to fight any kind of human and scientific progress. The Pope, Pius 6., condemned the declaration of human rights as a "monstrosity" in 1791, and later Popes followed up this. Gregory 16. declared the liberty of faith as "insane" (deliriamentum) in 1832. In 1868 Pope Pius 9. called the Austrian constitution which declared the freedom of speech, press, faith and teaching, and treated all religions equally, as a "disgusting law" (infanda lex).


The useless Ten CommandmentsOf the Ten Commandments, the first five rules are purely religious and regulating your relationship with God. So they are not particular helpful as guidelines for human to human conduct. Four of the last five commandments are all common "rules" found in most cultures past and present, and not at all particular to Christianity. The last commandment is concerned with "to covet" your neighbour's ox, wife and whatever, something which is beyond legislation. It's no point regulating people's yearnings or desires. It's just stupid.
As guidelines for human relations or for societies the Ten Commandments are tragically insufficient. From an all-knowing and omnipotent "God" we would expect something less banal, insufficient and crude!

And Jesus is not any better: Jesus uphold the bizarre laws of the Old Testament as he say "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." (Matt. 5:17) and "….it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail." (Luke 16:17).

The immorality in the biblical laws, commandments and rules, are found in the motivation behind them. You shall not kill/steal from/lie to a "brother" because its "Gods will", not because it is an evil unethical thing to do to your fellow man. At the same time it's obviously fine to kill people outside your own tribe/congregation. God himself does this all the time by the thousands in the "Good Book"..

The Moral of the Bible
 
Top Ten indications that you’re over-obsessed with religion

10 – You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.

9 – You feel insulted and "dehumanized" when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms, but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that humans were created from dirt.

8 – You laugh at polytheists, but you have no problem believing in a Triune God.

7 – Your face turns purple when you hear of the "atrocities" attributed to Allah, but you don't even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the male first-born babies of Egypt in "Exodus" and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in "Joshua" – including women, children, and trees.

6 – You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods consorting with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god who got killed, came back to life and then ascended into the sky.

5 – You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of the Earth (4.55 billion years), but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is about a couple of generations old.

4 – You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs – though excluding those in all rival sects – will spend Eternity in an infinite Hell of Suffering, and yet you consider your religion the most "tolerant" and "loving."

3 – While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor “speaking in tongues" may be all the evidence you need to "prove" your choice of religions to be the correct one.

2 – You define .01% as a "high success rate" when it comes to answered prayers, and consider that to be evidence that prayer works. And you think that the remaining 99.99% failure was simply the will of God.

1 – You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history – but you still call yourself a Christian.
 
Phew! I'm not over-obsessed with religion -- that's a relief. I do wonder about you though mike.

Im passionate about scientific knowledge and the advancement of mankind, recognising superstitious nonsense has had a detrimental effect on this process is part of that :D

It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.-- Carl Sagan,

The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion or in politics, but it is not the path to knowledge, and there's no place for it in the endeavor of science. We do not know beforehand where fundamental insights will arise from about our mysterious and lovely solar system. The history of our study of our solar system shows us clearly that accepted and conventional ideas are often wrong, and that fundamental insights can arise from the most unexpected sources.-- Carl Sagan

Positive Atheism's Big List of Carl Sagan Quotations
 
I suppose it comes down to a choice of philosophy

I could choose

"The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but moves even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both psychologically and theologically false, and at the least an error of faith."

Formal Church declaration in its indictment of Galileo

"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin."

Cardinal Bellarmine, during the trial of Galileo, 1615

"One Galileo in two thousand years is enough."

Pope Pius XII

The Roman Pontiff cannot and ought not to reconcile himself or agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization."
Pope Pius IX

or

The cure for a fallacious argument is a better argument, not the suppression of ideas.-- Carl Sagan,
 
Think of how many religions attempt to validate themselves with prophecy. Think of how many people rely on these prophecies, however vague, however unfulfilled, to support or prop up their beliefs. Yet has there ever been a religion with the prophetic accuracy and reliability of science? ... No other human institution comes close.-- Carl Sagan,
 
Many of the cartoon stories in The Brick Testament mentioned in a previous post, though the physical dexterity of the project is, at first and for a couple of minutes, rather admired, it quickly becomes apparent that the project is, indeed, the work of a child mentally.

Further exploration of the site, and I'm no prude or shocked easily, will quickly tell you the profaneness of the whole thing.

This is compounded by the intellectual immaturity, to put it mildly, in the "interpretation" of the Old Testament stories referred to.

Just one, at random, is the story in the last three chapters of Judges. I won't go into detail. You can read it yourself (if anyone cares, for any reason!). I just want to say that the Old Testament stories as portrayed in vulgar form on this website, not only are profanely presented, but get the whole story, its context, etc., all wrong. They are also embellished to show the story in its worst light, are horribly out of context, oversimplified, etc.

The story in Judges, and this can be used to describe much of the Old Testament, is a story having to do with the political situation in Israel at the time, tribal dynamics, interrelationships between towns, very, very importantly the customs between people and groups, and on and on. What is profanely told as a "dismemberment" story accompanied by graphic "artwork" (which quickly becomes BORRRRINGG), is in actuality a story of morality, a cautionary tale, a moral tale. It also takes place in a certain period in Israel's history.

And I am accused of pomposity by one of the moderators by, yes, rather pedantically, pointing this out?

I remind you of what to me is another aspect of some of these posts. It is shown in post number 153 of this thread and has a brief (!) tongue in cheek commentary by me. However, the parallel I point out is worth thinking about, I think.

For a quick comparison, see this cartoon from the website brought into this thread:

The Brick Testament

That "funny" and side splitting cartoon reminded me of something else I've seen:

Early Nazi Posters

Scroll down to the 6th, 17th, and 37th posters from the poster at the top.

A bit more reflection on this is at post number 153. Kim
 
But “God Is Just” You Claim:

Most Christians have responded to this statement with the following rationalization. “God can not let all of his creations into heaven because he is just.” I ask in rebuttal to this, since when is justice more important than love in the heart of a parent? Is hell even justice, or is it simply cruel and unusual punishment? The bible states the system of justice very simply. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. There is also another variation of that system with the biblical verse “eye for an eye”. The Christian God violates his own system of law when he damns his creations to eternal suffering for sins as menial as theft or blasphemy. I hardly think, nor would any logical person, that throwing someone into a gnashing jaw would be justly befitting of nearly any crime. (With the exception of murder, and even so, eternal punishment is pretty excessive.)

Most courts of law would take custody of your child from you just for an excessive spanking. We as a people enacted these laws, for we thought them to be logical. Is God above logic, or what we deem as compassionate behavior? After all he pitches a majority of his children into a lake of “fire and brimstone.” How many of us would want a parent such as that? Anyone of us would immediately sever our ties with such an abusive person. Yet Christians knowingly continue the insanity of giving worship to a God so cruel!

Why I am Not a Christian
 
Televangelist Pat Robertson. As the host of the Christian Broadcasting Network's (CBN) "700 Club" Pat Robertson spreads his stupidity over nationwide TV every day. There is no shortage of stupid and evil quotes from him that he is quite proud to keep disseminating.
Probably his most famous act of religiously motivated evil stupidity is contained in his interview with co-idiot Jerry Falwell right after the September 11th terrorist acts in which he blames the ACLU, abortionists, pagans, feminists, homosexuals, and People for the American Way for pissing off God and allowing the terrorists attacks to happen. Here is the transcript of these two idiots making total fools of themselves:

Falwell said, "What we saw on Tuesday, as terrible as it is, could be miniscule if, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve."

Robertson replied, "Well, Jerry, that's my feeling. I think we've just seen the antechamber to terror, we haven't begun to see what they can do to the major population."

Falwell said, "The ACLU has got to take a lot of blame for this. And I know I'll hear from them for this, but throwing God...successfully with the help of the federal court system...throwing God out of the public square, out of the schools, the abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked and when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad...I really believe that the pagans and the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who try to secularize America...I point the thing in their face and say you helped this happen."

Robertson said, "I totally concur, and the problem is we've adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government, and so we're responsible as a free society for what the top people do, and the top people, of course, is the court system."

Falwell added, "Pat, did you notice yesterday that the ACLU and all the Christ-haters, the People for the American Way, NOW, etc., were totally disregarded by the Democrats and the Republicans in both houses of Congress, as they went out on the steps and and called out to God in prayer and sang 'God bless America' and said, let the ACLU be hanged. In other words, when the nation is on its knees, the only normal and natural and spiritual thing to do is what we ought to be doing all the time, calling on God."
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/f/falwell-robertson-wtc.htm


The termites are in charge now, and that is not the way it ought to be, and the time has arrived for a godly fumigation.-- Pat Robertson, New York Magazine, August 18, 1986
 
Pastor Fred W. Phelps

Pastor Fred W. Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church is being named The Retard of the Month for his bigotry against homosexuals, for his sexism, for his xenophobic statements against several countries, and for publicly showing disrespect and lack of sympathy towards victims of many accidents, natural disasters, murders and terrorist acts, including but not limited to the World Trade Center bombing on the 11th of September, 2001.

Christians generally oppose homosexuals acts, but this man takes his views to the extreme and actually advocates the death penalty for homosexuals acts. He and his congregation, mainly composed of family members, have organized thousands of pickets at various locations both in and outside of the U.S.A., in the last 10 years, preaching their hateful drivel against homosexuals and virtually anyone who disagrees with their insane religious beliefs or actions. During a demonstration, they display signs containing "GOD HATES FAGS", "THANK GOD FOR AIDS", "FAGS DIE, GOD LAUGHS", "AIDS CURES FAGS", "FAGS BURN IN HELL", "FAGS DOOM NATIONS", "GOD GAVE FAGS UP", "THANK GOD FOR 9/11" etcetera.

They believe the 9/11 attacks, the death of many American soldiers in Iraq, hurricane Katrina, the Columbia shuttle accident and the murder of the five Amish girls are punishment from God for the U.S.A.'s tolerance of homosexuals acts. As if all of this wasn't bad enough, the heartless bastards picket funerals of dead soldiers and homosexuals, thus showing no sympathy for the friends and family of the deceased. They have even considered picketing the funeral of the five slain Amish girls, although they cancelled the protest, not because they actually realized how wrong it is, but because they were given an hour of radio time on Mike Gallagher's program instead.

Protests are not their only means of spreading their hateful garbage. For example, the Westboro Baptist Church owns several sites including GodHatesFags.com, GodHatesAmerica.com, GodHatesCanada.com and GodHatesSweden.com. The titles of these websites alone are revolting to any decent human being. Shortly after the tsunamis in Asia occurred, they posted the statement on their main site: "THANK GOD FOR 20000 DEAD SWEDES, WISH IT WERE MORE". Here is another evil statement which can be found in their website F.A.Q.:

We sincerely hope and pray that all 20,000 Swedes are dead, their bodies bloated on the ground or in mass graves or floating at sea feeding sharks and fishes or in the bellies of thousands of crocodiles washed ashore by tsunamis. These filthy, faggot Swedes have a satanic, draconian law criminalizing Gospel preaching, under which they prosecuted, convicted and sentenced Pastor Ake Green to jail - thereby incurring God's irreversible wrath - Westboro Baptist Church

The "God Hates Sweden" website was created as a response to the imprisonment of another retarded fundie who publicly made bigoted statements against homosexuals in Sweden.

On top of all of this, Fred Phelps is a sexist as he believes women are not allowed to preach. His website quotes the following biblical passages as evidence:

"1 Tim. 2:9-14 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1 Cor. 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

For his unbelievable display of idiocy and disrespect for the entire human race generated by religion, Fred W. Phelps is being awarded The Retard of the Month Award.
 
Christians, they love to talk about how loving, dutiful and compassionate they are, yet I have yet to meet ONE who does not practice hypocrisy to the highest degree. Their willful ignorance of the Bible combined with their two faced idealism to preach it, has made us sick, hasn’t it? For nearly two thousand years Biblicists have been lecturing people on the importance of adhering to the Bible’s teachings on ethics, manners, and morality. They quote Jesus and Paul profusely, with a liberal sprinkling of Old Testament moralism. The problem with their approach lies not only in an oft- noted failure to practice what they preach, but an equally pronounced tendency to ignore what the Bible itself, preaches. Christians practice what can only be described as “selective morality”. What they like, they cling to and shove down other’s throats; what they don’t like, they ignore vehemently. That which is palatable and acceptable is supposedly applicable to all; while that which is obnoxious, inconvenient, or self-denying is only applicable to those addressed 2,000 years ago. Their hypocrisy is so rampant that even the validity of calling oneself “Christian” is in question. I see so many people enjoy quoting the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, and some of Paul’s sermons, but don’t even PRETEND to heed other, equally valid, maxims. I’ve mentioned pro-life and conservatism in other sermons. This one is going to sum up the rest of my beefs.
Christians Are Hypocrites
 
US President George W. Bush for his religiously motivated actions that effectively halt stem cell research in the United States. Stem cell research has the potential to deliver many medical advances that were previously impossible, possibly saving the lives of millions of sick people and improving the quality of life of many more sick people. The lives and welfare of millions of people are affected by by George Bush's insane belief in a magical sky-daddy. Mr. Bush knows that his actions will hurt many people but he does it anyway simply because he thinks that that's what his God wants him to do in order to get to heaven. In a sense he is no different than a suicide bomber, he's willing to kill many other people so that he can get to heaven.
Mr. Bush's actions continue a long legacy of Christian stupidity and interference into legitimate medical research. In the past couple of centuries Christians have rioted to prevent medical schools from using dead bodies to train medical doctors because they thought that autopsies might keep the dead from going to heaven. Christians have fought in-vitro fertilization which has allowed millions of infertile couples to bear children, and many of them are still fighting against sex education programs which include "safe-sex" techniques, such as condom use, which help prevent the spread of deadly diseases such as AIDS.
Bush Jr.
 
Like father like son

A monthly feature of the EvilBible.com web site is the award of the Retard of the Month to the person or persons who have demonstrated an exceptional level of public stupidity due to religion. Nominees must be public officials or public figures. Suggestions for future Retards of the Month can be made by e-mailing Editor@EvilBible.com.

The Retard of the Month for May 2004 was:

Former President George H.W. Bush for saying "I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
The following exchange took place at the Chicago airport between Robert I. Sherman of American Atheist Press and George H.W. Bush, on August 27 1987. Sherman is a fully accredited reporter, and was present by invitation as a member of the press corps. The Republican presidential nominee was there to announce federal disaster relief for Illinois. The discussion turned to the presidential primary:
RS:
"What will you do to win the votes of Americans who are atheists?"
GB:
"I guess I'm pretty weak in the atheist community. Faith in God is important to me."
RS:
"Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?"
GB:
"No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
RS:
"Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation of state and church?"
GB:
"Yes, I support the separation of church and state. I'm just not very high on atheists."
UPI reported on May 8, 1989, that various atheist organizations were still angry over the remarks.
The exchange appeared in the Boulder Daily Camera on Monday February 27, 1989. It can also be found in "Free Inquiry" magazine, Fall 1988 issue, Volume 8, Number 4, page 16.
On October 29, 1988, Mr. Sherman had a confrontation with Ed Murnane, co-chairman of the Bush-Quayle '88 Illinois campaign. This concerned a lawsuit Mr. Sherman had filed to stop the Community Consolidated School District 21 (Chicago, Illinois) from forcing his first-grade atheist son to pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States as "one nation under God" (Bush's phrase). The following conversation took place:
RS:
"American Atheists filed the Pledge of Allegiance lawsuit yesterday. Does the Bush campaign have an official response to this filing?"
EM:
"It's bullshit."
RS:
"What is bullshit?"
EM:
"Everything that American Atheists does, Rob, is bullshit."
RS:
"Thank you for telling me what the official position of the Bush campaign is on this issue."
EM:
"You're welcome."
After Bush's election, American Atheists wrote to Bush asking him to retract his statement. On February 21st 1989, C. Boyden Gray, Counsel to the President, replied on White House stationery that Bush substantively stood by his original statement, and wrote:
"As you are aware, the President is a religious man who neither supports atheism nor believes that atheism should be unnecessarily encouraged or supported by the government."​

George Bush states that atheists are not citizens or patriots
 
Like father like son

A monthly feature of the EvilBible.com web site is the award of the Retard of the Month to the person or persons who have demonstrated an exceptional level of public stupidity due to religion. Nominees must be public officials or public figures. Suggestions for future Retards of the Month can be made by e-mailing Editor@EvilBible.com.

The Retard of the Month for May 2004 was:

Former President George H.W. Bush for saying "I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
The following exchange took place at the Chicago airport between Robert I. Sherman of American Atheist Press and George H.W. Bush, on August 27 1987. Sherman is a fully accredited reporter, and was present by invitation as a member of the press corps. The Republican presidential nominee was there to announce federal disaster relief for Illinois. The discussion turned to the presidential primary:
RS:
"What will you do to win the votes of Americans who are atheists?"
GB:
"I guess I'm pretty weak in the atheist community. Faith in God is important to me."
RS:
"Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?"
GB:
"No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
RS:
"Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation of state and church?"
GB:
"Yes, I support the separation of church and state. I'm just not very high on atheists."
UPI reported on May 8, 1989, that various atheist organizations were still angry over the remarks.
The exchange appeared in the Boulder Daily Camera on Monday February 27, 1989. It can also be found in "Free Inquiry" magazine, Fall 1988 issue, Volume 8, Number 4, page 16.
On October 29, 1988, Mr. Sherman had a confrontation with Ed Murnane, co-chairman of the Bush-Quayle '88 Illinois campaign. This concerned a lawsuit Mr. Sherman had filed to stop the Community Consolidated School District 21 (Chicago, Illinois) from forcing his first-grade atheist son to pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States as "one nation under God" (Bush's phrase). The following conversation took place:
RS:
"American Atheists filed the Pledge of Allegiance lawsuit yesterday. Does the Bush campaign have an official response to this filing?"
EM:
"It's bullshit."
RS:
"What is bullshit?"
EM:
"Everything that American Atheists does, Rob, is bullshit."
RS:
"Thank you for telling me what the official position of the Bush campaign is on this issue."
EM:
"You're welcome."
After Bush's election, American Atheists wrote to Bush asking him to retract his statement. On February 21st 1989, C. Boyden Gray, Counsel to the President, replied on White House stationery that Bush substantively stood by his original statement, and wrote:
"As you are aware, the President is a religious man who neither supports atheism nor believes that atheism should be unnecessarily encouraged or supported by the government."​

George Bush states that atheists are not citizens or patriots
I couldn't connect to this site for about 15 minutes. Do you think the Christians are hacking this site?
 
I couldn't connect to this site for about 15 minutes. Do you think the Christians are hacking this site?

Seems ok to me, well worth a read too.

at least 2.2 million atheists Americans fought in American wars from World War Two onward. Tens of thousands have died "for America." George would have these men and women stripped of their citizenship? He does not recognize their patriotism
 
Back
Top