Walter Bosley
Paranormal Adept
I did not know about the other investigator on the Paulides material. I will check out that review back-and-forth.
Regardless of whatever question as to the value or theatrics of what he does with the 411 material, speaking as a former FBI operational specialist and as a former Special Agent of AFOSI and as a former counterterrorist field guy, and as a reserve (inactive) USAF officer, I stand by my assessment of what he describes was the reaction the Parks Service displayed to his requests. If the way he described, I don't care a dog turd about the National Parks tourist campaign needs, if they have a problem like this and an investigator is willing to put the man hours into working it and has made professional requests for information (yes also as an author/investigative journalist), their proper response is "Yes, Citizen Investigator Journalist, we at your service, how can we help? Here's what we can give, here's what we can't. We aplogize for any inconvenience." I'm telling you, any agent who responded to Paulides the way he describes (assuming it's true) would be having a less than pleasant discussion with his supervisor -- regardless of their opinion of Paulides' work. Now I must admit, some of the jackoffs recruited into LE since 9/11 may be changing the game, but MOST of these guys would respond professionally and courteously even when stonewalling. That is my experience with that world.
Whether Paulides' work is valuable curiosity or useless hype, I'm gonna say the truth would be at least somewhere in the middle of that spectrum. I would like to see what other investigators who have worked say on the matter, of course. I didn't know others were, so maybe my mind will be changed. At present, I still say it's among the top three most interesting issues in the alternative research field, until I'm convinced otherwise and that is not impossible.
Are there books or interviews?
Also, in fairness, I don't recall Paulides himself ever proposing any answer much less saying it was a paranormal issue. That is what other people bring into the discussion. Unless I missed something.
Regardless of whatever question as to the value or theatrics of what he does with the 411 material, speaking as a former FBI operational specialist and as a former Special Agent of AFOSI and as a former counterterrorist field guy, and as a reserve (inactive) USAF officer, I stand by my assessment of what he describes was the reaction the Parks Service displayed to his requests. If the way he described, I don't care a dog turd about the National Parks tourist campaign needs, if they have a problem like this and an investigator is willing to put the man hours into working it and has made professional requests for information (yes also as an author/investigative journalist), their proper response is "Yes, Citizen Investigator Journalist, we at your service, how can we help? Here's what we can give, here's what we can't. We aplogize for any inconvenience." I'm telling you, any agent who responded to Paulides the way he describes (assuming it's true) would be having a less than pleasant discussion with his supervisor -- regardless of their opinion of Paulides' work. Now I must admit, some of the jackoffs recruited into LE since 9/11 may be changing the game, but MOST of these guys would respond professionally and courteously even when stonewalling. That is my experience with that world.
Whether Paulides' work is valuable curiosity or useless hype, I'm gonna say the truth would be at least somewhere in the middle of that spectrum. I would like to see what other investigators who have worked say on the matter, of course. I didn't know others were, so maybe my mind will be changed. At present, I still say it's among the top three most interesting issues in the alternative research field, until I'm convinced otherwise and that is not impossible.
Are there books or interviews?
Also, in fairness, I don't recall Paulides himself ever proposing any answer much less saying it was a paranormal issue. That is what other people bring into the discussion. Unless I missed something.
Last edited: