Suggested Guests

[cottonzway]

Jim Fetzer openly supports known "spook" Dr. Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood. He openly supports their bull****. That is why people split from the ST group and distanced themselves from Fetzer. He is spewing total disinformation. Now if he is being "handled" to do so I do not know but he clearly is hurting serious debates about 9/11 supporting ignorant nonsense that a child an clearly tell you is bull****. Sorry man, but he sold out.

 

[BrandonD]

Jim Fetzer openly supports known "spook" Dr. Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood. He openly supports their bull****. That is why people split from the ST group and distanced themselves from Fetzer. He is spewing total disinformation. Now if he is being "handled" to do so I do not know but he clearly is hurting serious debates about 9/11 supporting ignorant nonsense that a child an clearly tell you is bull****. Sorry man, but he sold out.

I saw Dr Morgan Reynolds at a 9/11 lecture at the local university. He was presenting the basic evidence supporting the idea that our current administration leaders had at least some level of participation in the attacks. He seemed like a well-reasoned guy and didn't appear to leading people astray, as far as I could tell. Where did you get this information that he is a known "spook"? And what would be the benefit of a spook going out and lecturing on the 9/11 conspiracy? Is it to gauge the level of public support for this idea?

 

[Rick Deckard]

Personally i can not wait for a Bart Sibrel Paracast episode...

Erm, looks like you are in for a *very long* wait then...

...while we're (quietly) talking about the moon landings (shhhh, David's around), the BBC are a running poll...

BBC Moon Hoax Vote Page

...here are the current totals:

Did we really land on the Moon?

Current results:
Yes (11363 votes) 59.0%
No (7884 votes) 41.0%

There's obviously a lot of deluded individuals out there - well, at least 11,363 anyway...(just kidding, honest).

 

[cottonzway]

I saw Dr Morgan Reynolds at a 9/11 lecture at the local university. He was presenting the basic evidence supporting the idea that our current administration leaders had at least some level of participation in the attacks. He seemed like a well-reasoned guy and didn't appear to leading people astray, as far as I could tell. Where did you get this information that he is a known "spook"? And what would be the benefit of a spook going out and lecturing on the 9/11 conspiracy? Is it to gauge the level of public support for this idea?

I guess the most important question I have is when did you see Dr. Reynolds give his presentation? He did not at first come out and say the types of things he is now and he may have had good intnetions at the time. IN the last 12-18 months though he has been one of the main supporters of two outlandish "theories" that are obvioulsy not possible even at face value.

He first started with the "no planes" theory. That is that NO PLANES hit the towers, but all of the video is CG from a bluescreen. He tries to explain how all of the people who saw it in person saw a hologram or says the people who are interviewed are agents who are lying. He has been on FOX and MSNBC supporting this nonsense.

After people laughed at him for those obviously bunk idea he supported a new threory. Along with "crazy" Judy Wood (a Dr. and former Clemson professor) they support a new idea that says space beams from the old star wars program caused the fall of the twin towers. That's right, space beams.

Now I don't know for fact that he is a "spook" but why would a guy for his intelligence all of the sudden support such nonsense? So either someone got to him (paying him or threating him) or he simply has lost his mind. If you were not aware of what he is promoting now please look it up. It will stun you as well and make you very angry.

 

[BrandonD]

I guess the most important question I have is when did you see Dr. Reynolds give his presentation? He did not at first come out and say the types of things he is now and he may have had good intnetions at the time. IN the last 12-18 months though he has been one of the main supporters of two outlandish "theories" that are obvioulsy not possible even at face value.

He first started with the "no planes" theory. That is that NO PLANES hit the towers, but all of the video is CG from a bluescreen. He tries to explain how all of the people who saw it in person saw a hologram or says the people who are interviewed are agents who are lying. He has been on FOX and MSNBC supporting this nonsense.

After people laughed at him for those obviously bunk idea he supported a new threory. Along with "crazy" Judy Wood (a Dr. and former Clemson professor) they support a new idea that says space beams from the old star wars program caused the fall of the twin towers. That's right, space beams.

Now I don't know for fact that he is a "spook" but why would a guy for his intelligence all of the sudden support such nonsense? So either someone got to him (paying him or threating him) or he simply has lost his mind. If you were not aware of what he is promoting now please look it up. It will stun you as well and make you very angry.

Man that is nuts, I saw him at least a year ago and he didn't say ANYTHING like that. His presentation was very basic, just presenting the overwhelming evidence for complicity and cover-up. No holograms or space lasers.

You know, it almost leads one to think that someone's screwing with his brain.

 

[Casual Paracast Listener]

At cottonzway and in general,

I have just listened again to a "2004.06.12 - Jim Fetzer - Scientific Evidence of the JFK & 9.11 Conspiracies" interview And let me tell you... the man is smart well versed, nice, expert on his subject "The Kennedy
Assassination" along side with a team of experts in different fields, says "i do not know" when he does not know", And regarding 911 the bulk of the talk was on the pentagon no boeing 707 plane which by the way hardly the other side can bring any substantial evidence of a boeing crashing into the pentagon.

And there was not any of the stuff that you claim that he says now a days nor that there is any hint to a no planes hit the WTC towers, In fact there is a moment when he makes a remark on the hijackers' nationality and let me tell you there is no "space beams" either.

I can not imagine a gentleman such as Jim Fetzer make such claims that you say he made nor to to imagine that he would support anyone makes such of a claim.


Now to a different subject "The main one"

Mr. Steinberg, I would appreciate it if you post a feed back to my wish list of guests and if it would be possible to have any of the Tier one Suggested Guests in the near future.

Personally i have heard them all and i already have an excellent audio interviews that i can listen to when needed but still i would still like if you and david host them on your show so that others get a chance to listen to what they had to say as well to see what you and david can bring out of them.

That is about it, Have a nice day

 

[cottonzway]

I suggest you look up my claims to either disprove them or see if I am being truthful. Never trust anyone on their "word" when it comes to these types of issues. I happen to think the guy is part of a COINPROTEL myself, but maybe it was his ego or he lost his mind. Regardless, use Google to prove/disprove my claim.

 

[neuromancer]

If David and Gene manage to get Dr. Vallee on air, then it wud be the biggest coup that they have ever pulled!

 

[Casual Paracast Listener]

Just wanted to retract on Michael S. Heiser and Alex Jones requests, personally i am no longer interested in any of what they got to say.

@ cottonzway

Well i was already searching for videos of such of claims that Jim Fetzer may have made... It is just that there are so many videos to look at and i do not currently can afford such a task to allocate time and effort in doing so but i am on it.

And one of the videos that i was watching while searching, He made an intro that could indeed lead to the hi-tech unheard of weapon systems that may have been used however the video finished at that point, What had upset me the most that Alex Jones was on the panel with him or at least in his vicinity.

And although AJ, i regard him as some what smart, knowing & have some valid points to make in general but i do not regard him as a credible person anymore which also going to cast shadows at least in my mind when i see JF on same panel with him or singing on the same tune.

But as far as the JF's take on the JFK assassination case i highly regard him but as for 911 event, It's just like i have said before. Prior posting here i did not hear a lot from JF take on 911, Just some general points that were all in the valid box as far as i am concern.

There are a lot to be said about 911 but no WTC towers planes or a hi-tech unheard of weapon system that kind of mimics "space beams" are not of them.

So if i come across anything that is like JF adopts any of those two points and embraces them as what he thinks, Then it will be the end of JF's credibility as far as i am concern as this is not a matter of difference in opinions.

Anyway have a nice day all, Oh and by the way the show sucks big time lately and this is a matter of opinion. It is not that i have went into the torture of listening to the last number of episodes but why listen to it when the subjects and guest are going no where.

 

[cottonzway]

Just wanted to retract on Michael S. Heiser and Alex Jones requests, personally i am no longer interested in any of what they got to say.

@ cottonzway

Well i was already searching for videos of such of claims that Jim Fetzer may have made... It is just that there are so many videos to look at and i do not currently can afford such a task to allocate time and effort in doing so but i am on it.

And one of the videos that i was watching while searching, He made an intro that could indeed lead to the hi-tech unheard of weapon systems that may have been used however the video finished at that point, What had upset me the most that Alex Jones was on the panel with him or at least in his vicinity.

And although AJ, i regard him as some what smart, knowing & have some valid points to make in general but i do not regard him as a credible person anymore which also going to cast shadows at least in my mind when i see JF on same panel with him or singing on the same tune.

But as far as the JF's take on the JFK assassination case i highly regard him but as for 911 event, It's just like i have said before. Prior posting here i did not hear a lot from JF take on 911, Just some general points that were all in the valid box as far as i am concern.

There are a lot to be said about 911 but no WTC towers planes or a hi-tech unheard of weapon system that kind of mimics "space beams" are not of them.

So if i come across anything that is like JF adopts any of those two points and embraces them as what he thinks, Then it will be the end of JF's credibility as far as i am concern as this is not a matter of difference in opinions.

Anyway have a nice day all, Oh and by the way the show sucks big time lately and this is a matter of opinion. It is not that i have went into the torture of listening to the last number of episodes but why listen to it when the subjects and guest are going no where.

I can chime in on a few things here once again. As for when you saw Alex Jones with Jim Fetzer it was the 9/11 Truth Symposium that was carried on C-Span over a year ago. This event also had Morgan Reynolds there as well. This was prior to their claims of "space beams and no planes" and also prior to when Fetzer split with Steven Jones. Fetzer was there because he did not turn his back then as well and Dr. Reynolds on the truth movement like they have now with their COINTELPRO.

I can tell you this about Alex Jones though, he is the best chance to expose these people. He has gotten very aggressive in his stance with the globalists and I think this is the right course of action. I don't always agree with Alex, but I highlyt respect him because he is on the front line of a battle that the American people MUST win. I disagree with you on about Alex because he sources his claims. That is important. It's one thing to rant and rave while not saying anything of substance but another to also add in sourced info that you can check out for yourself. I've never found a claim of his to be an outright lie and in many cases the truth of the topic is watered down to reach people without scarying them. He is doing more for this country right now for just about everyone IMO.

 

[Aaron LeClair]

Erm, looks like you are in for a *very long* wait then...

...while we're (quietly) talking about the moon landings (shhhh, David's around), the BBC are a running poll...

BBC Moon Hoax Vote Page

...here are the current totals:

Did we really land on the Moon?

Current results:
Yes (11363 votes) 59.0%
No (7884 votes) 41.0%

There's obviously a lot of deluded individuals out there - well, at least 11,363 anyway...(just kidding, honest).

Given the question that is surprisingly high. The no votes that is. I wonder how it was interpreted. I take the question to ask if we've ever been to the moon. Was the question in the context of a given mission?

 

[Casual Paracast Listener]

@ cottonzway

Regarding AJ, check-out this file
I would rather AJ than no AJ at all but as far as credibility goes... hmmm no i am sorry truth & lies weaved together, sometimes oversimplified and other times fuss over nothing ect... Oh and one more thing when ever alex is over a radio show he starts kissing host's ass happened with over c2c and jeffrense show and the comedy is that he always tells them "Well you know .... I do not say this to anyone but you are so & so"

What is hilarious is that AJ was standing and ranting how it is the world as we know it basically is going to end tomorrow or the day after, However he was keen to run ad segments.

Anyway got to run so have a nice day for now

 

[tommyball]

How about a special 2 part episode with Nick Pope, Richard Dolan and Paul Kimball?

I think an annual or semi-annual round table discussion between Gene & David and some reputable UFO researchers might be a good way to shed some more light on where this field is going in terms of getting to some real knowledge.

-todd

 

[Gene Steinberg]

How about a special 2 part episode with Nick Pope, Richard Dolan and Paul Kimball?

I think an annual or semi-annual round table discussion between Gene & David and some reputable UFO researchers might be a good way to shed some more light on where this field is going in terms of getting to some real knowledge.

-todd

Not a bad idea. As with all your suggestions, folks, we'll listen real carefully and do what we can with the best ones

 

[Nekrinos]

These are all good guests... I still think we need to have Mr. Dona back on. hat was a great episode

 

[scott]

How about getting Garrett Husveth or Al Rauber (excellent paranormal investigators) from the Haunted New Jersey Podcast? They have some amazing EVPs. I'd love to ask them what they think these entities really want.

Also, what about the mystic and philosopher, Ken Wilber? He's spent his life studying all aspects of human conciousness but I've never heard his take on anything paranormal.

 

[Aaron LeClair]

How about getting Garrett Husveth or Al Rauber (excellent paranormal investigators) from the Haunted New Jersey Podcast? They have some amazing EVPs. I'd love to ask them what they think these entities really want.

Also, what about the mystic and philosopher, Ken Wilber? He's spent his life studying all aspects of human conciousness but I've never heard his take on anything paranormal.

If you like Ken Wilber, you might like the book Bridging Science and Spirit by Norman Friedman.

 

[scott]

If you like Ken Wilber, you might like the book Bridging Science and Spirit by Norman Friedman.

Thanks, I'll have to check it out.

 

[Aaron LeClair]

Thanks, I'll have to check it out.

It deals with the paranormal/Seth-Jane Roberts, David Bohm's take on quantum physics, and Wilber's interpretation of the perennial philosophy. So you have science, philosophy, and the paranormal dealt with.

 

[andersonglk]

Let me preface this by saying "Hi!"
I discovered The Paracast a few months ago and have since downloaded and listened to nearly every episode; many of them several times over. I am lucky enough to be able to use an MP3 player for a large part of my workday, and I generally listen to audiobooks or other types of spoken word sessions. The Paracast has been like a godsend to me. Anyways, to stay on topic...

I would be very interested to hear a show with William Henry as a guest.

Also, please get Mr. Jeff Ritzmann on again. I have listened to many of his interviews (on The Paracast and other shows,) have read many of his posts on web forums, and have found him to be a very likeable and extremely interesting guy. Besides, anybody who can take such a strong and reasonable tone with a certain Mr. Horn is an admirable person in his own right.

Keep up the great work Gene and David!