• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

THANK YOU Ufology, Stonehart and Sue -- You all rocked!

Free episodes:

Not sure. I haven't had any other complaints. Both ATP and the premium version of The Paracast are part of the same feed.

We check it and test it when it goes up.

Which podcast player are you using?
 
Its a built in app on my Sony Xperia Z3. The current version of Android has a status bar and it clearly states aftertheparacast but the end result is a duplicate of the original broadcast

I bypassed the podcast app and signed in on the forum and just hit the download button link on the paracast+ forum and same thing that status bar indicates it's the after show but the download file shows the result is another original full broadcast and comes in at 108.5 MB which is the size of the original broadcast.
 
Disregard Gene the download from the forum was the ATP it just went into a different folder I was looking in the wrong folder

But regardless the feed that identifies itself as atp does give my the original broadcast.
 
Never going to happen. The truth that the Republicans don't want to admit is that more Mexicans are leaving the U.S. than entering it these days. There are more undocumented Asian immigrants than Latin when it comes to recent arrivals. The presence of border guards on the southern border has doubled over the past decade.

The claim of "porous borders" is sheer nonsense. Look it up.

Mexicans by and large come to the U.S. for better financial opportunities. But as the economy in Mexico improves, some go back, and others are discouraged from leaving. The number of undocumented immigrants in this country is now lower. Again, the Republicans are afraid to admit this fact.

See:

What we know about illegal immigration from Mexico

Another talking point is the false allegation that the failed immigration reform bill of which Rubio was a key architect — before he bailed when the going got tough — was an amnesty bill. There was no amnesty in it. It provisioned an expensive and lengthy path to legalization, which is the polar opposite of amnesty. The last amnesty bill was passed during the Reagan administration.
 
It's up to the voters, and if they go against him in the remaining primaries, by and large, he'll be history. Unless he doesn't cry foul and try a third party run. Anything's possible.
 
Btw., I think stonehart's observation of many musicians being interested in paranormal subjects is spot-on (at least I think it was stonehart who said it), although I would expand that to creative people in general.

It's probably to do with them (well, us, actually, I've played in a band and in my free time I do some writing and fiddling about in music programs) often being out-of-the-box thinkers and probably less afraid of being called crazy (because people already put them in the fringe).

I also think it's not a coincidence, that in the Rhine experiments, creative outgoing people often scored high in Zener card tests. It seems that being open to possibilities might actually mean you'll have a higher chance of own experiences. Being introverted or extroverted seems to have effects, though (I think introverts might tend towards psychosomatic effects rather than outside ones).

And, in reversion, I think that being strictly closed-minded actually means you can block them (again, with extroverted sceptics actually influencing the consciousness field - the "energies" around them).

Of course, these are all nothing but speculations on my part.
 
... Ufology, during conversation on the show about Amy Allan you said,

"I don't think anyone is in contact with dead people."​

Actually, though I am a theist, I would tend to strongly agree with your statement, even though the grounds on which I'd support that statement would be quite different from yours ...

Yes. I would have liked to have been able to expand on that, but it can get a bit involved and I didn't want to monopolize the discussion. My reasoning is based purely on logic that given the available evidence, is sufficient to justify my statement. The reasoning involves a more in-depth look at what we mean by life, identity, personality, death, and consciousness. Without delving into it at this moment, I do recall saying something to the effect that I do believe strange experiences and perceptions happen, but there is a problem with how we interpret them. In the case of life after death, belief is based on a leap in logic that upon closer inspection simply cannot be the case.

I would however also be interested in what your reasoning is and hope you decide to share.
 
Just finished listening to the latest broadcast and i have to say that although i haven't ever been critical of the Paracast i am quite dissatisified with this broadcast and it left a bitter taste in my mouth.

While i respect all the views and opinions of two of your guests (Randall & Sue) it was obvious from the outset that the man whom we've all come to know as stoneheart ( David) is CLEARLY a disinformation agent and you guys allowed him to spread his lies with nary a challenge. shame on you. Randall especially should have been all over him like flies on , well you know.

All these years he (stoneheart) has been allowed to appear here he has pulled the wool over our eyes and had us all fooled, well buddy , if you are reading this, just know that I am on to you. The next time you guys have him on the show, IF there's a next time , it would behoove you to hold his feet to the fire, and heaven help him if he has the audacity to appear while i am on. I am not a confrontational person by any means but in this case i really did feel as if my intellengence was insulted and if he is ever allowed to appear on the show again unchecked i will be forced to cancel my subscription to the paracast+

Peace,
Wade
 
Last edited:
Just finished listening to the latest broadcast and i have to say that although i haven't ever been critical of the Paracast i am quite dissatisified with this broadcast and it left a bitter taste in my mouth.

While i respect all the views and opinions of two of your guests (Randall & Sue) it was obvious from the outset that the man whom we've all come to know as stoneheart ( David) is CLEARLY a disinformation agent and you guys allowed him to spread his lies with nary a challenge. shame on you. Randall especially should have been all over him like flies on , well you know.

All these years he (stoneheart) has been allowed to appear here he has pulled the wool over our eyes and had us all fooled, well buddy , if you are reading this, just know that I am on to you. The next time you guys have him on the show, IF there's a next time , it would behoove you to hold his feet to the fire, and heaven help him if he has the audacity to appear while i am on. I am not a confrontational person by any means but in this case i really did feel as if my intellengence was insulted and if he is ever allowed to appear on the show again unchecked i will be forced to cancel my subscription to the paracast+

Peace,
Wade

Wow, I can't wait to hear more of what he had to say to see what could have riled you up so much. I'm only about 15 minutes into the show so far (after fast forwarding through the political opinions) and I haven't heard anything controversial yet. I will listen more intently now, for sure.
 
it was tongue in cheek Tech, stoney..as well as sue and ufology...was as agreeable and pleasant as a warm summer rain.

sorry for the confusion, my sense of humor can be a little warped at times and doesn't always convey well.
 
it was tongue in cheek Tech, stoney..as well as sue and ufology...was as agreeable and pleasant as a warm summer rain.

sorry for the confusion, my sense of humor can be a little warped at times and doesn't always convey well.

Ha, that's a good one! You totally fooled me! :D
 
Yes. I would have liked to have been able to expand on that, but it can get a bit involved and I didn't want to monopolize the discussion. My reasoning is based purely on logic that given the available evidence, is sufficient to justify my statement. The reasoning involves a more in-depth look at what we mean by life, identity, personality, death, and consciousness. Without delving into it at this moment, I do recall saying something to the effect that I do believe strange experiences and perceptions happen, but there is a problem with how we interpret them. In the case of life after death, belief is based on a leap in logic that upon closer inspection simply cannot be the case.

I would however also be interested in what your reasoning is and hope you decide to share.

Ufology, I think generally, people are prepared to make certain leaps of logic depending on the estimated distance. I also think that, sometimes, an individual's non-repeatable life experiences support leaps of logic that, to the unexperienced, seem as wide as the Grand Canyon. Then again, I think there's a lot of confusion about such things that results from too much enthusiasm, and not enough cool reflection.

I thought I would list what seems are predominant ways in which humans see reality (world views). Nothing necessarily says any are true, it is just what many humans have accepted about reality. This list is my impression, it is not exhaustive, and I would imagine that various aspects overlap for many people. For example, I am no expert but it seems to me that traditional views of First Nations folk take reality as mix of animism and possibly Theism of some sort, if a Great Spirit fills that role:

Naturalism — (e.g. non-theism, atheism, secularism)

Reality is defined by random interfacing of matter, energy, fields, space and time, and contains no transcendent "spiritual" aspect. Life, cognition and intelligence arose in a low-entropy valley from long-term arbitrary interaction of these elemental constituents of reality. Transcendent "spiritual" experiences result exclusively from the brain's bio-electro-chemistry, possibly aided by natural external field effects on the brain. UFOs, evaluated in these terms, are either:​
  • real physical craft with real physical occupants from distant space, ETH
  • natural phenomena
  • subjective brain-manufactured dream-like visions with no existence outside the observer
Animism | Polytheism — (e.g. Gaia? Wicca? First Nations? shamanism, Hinduism)

Reality contains not only basic constituents recognized by naturalism, but also a transcendent aspect, including intelligent nonphysical entities which humans can perceive and interact with. Transcendent experiences can result from a combination of the brain's bio-electro-chemistry, an innate human transcendent aspect, and interaction with external transcendent beings or aspect of reality. UFOs could either be:​
  • ETH
  • real, internal trancendent aspect, or external transcendent intelligence directly interacting with the observer
  • natural phenomena
  • subjective, brain-manufactured vision
Pantheism | Deism | Philosophical Theism — (e.g. Spinoza, Einstein? Gödel)

Reality contains the elements of naturalism, as well as a cohesive and overarching intelligence, a Deity, which is either immanent in all things (pantheism), or distinct from the universe and currently non-interactive (deism), or distinct from the universe and personally detectable and interactive (Gödel, philosophical theism). Transcendent experiences can result from a combination of the brain's bio-electro-chemistry and an innate human transcendent aspect that could interact with the universal intelligence (philosophical theism). UFOs could either be:​
  • ETH
  • real, external transcendent intelligence directly interacting with the observer
  • natural phenomena
  • subjective, brain-manufactured vision
Revelatory Theism — (e.g. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, other revealed religions)

Reality contains the elements of naturalism, as well as a cohesive and overarching transcendent infinite intelligence – Theos-God – who intentionally interacts with humans at times. Reality also includes subordinate intelligences that interact with humans either in obedience to God (angels) or in disobedience (sheddim, daimonia-demons, jinn, Satan). Transcendent experiences can result from a combination of the brain's bio-electro-chemistry, and an innate human transcendent aspect that can interact with the universal transcendent intelligence, or the subordinate intelligences. UFOs could either be:​
  • ETH
  • real, external transcendent intelligence directly interacting with the observer
  • natural phenomena
  • subjective, brain-manufactured vision
An experiencer's report of UFOs or paranormal phenomena, and an investigators examination of such phenomena, will doubtless be influenced by their view of reality. So IMHO familiarity with these various views is important. IMHO, the ETH is possible, but is the least likely source of the multitute of UFO reports.

In addition to the above, naturalism would typically say that an individual's existence is completely and permanently terminated at death (annihilation). The remaining views would at least leave open the possibility, or affirm, that the transcendent "spiritual" component of an individual's existence continues after bodily death (e.g. reincarnation, or resurrection, or a permanent spiritual state).

It is worth remembering that no one knew of the microbial world of bacteria until microscopes went into wide use in the mid-17th century. But before then everyone knew that something "invisible" caused, for example, the Black Death, 1346–53, where from 30 to 60 percent of Europe died from bacterial infections. Likewise, it is possible that there is a transcendent "invisible" realm that causes so much of humanity to accept a spiritual aspect to life, and that the tool to investigate that realm has yet to be invented. It was only in '70's that dark matter left the realm of speculation to fact, thanks to Vera Rubin's observations of spiral arm galaxy red shift anomalies. If, from a scientific point of view, visible matter is now understood to make up only about four percent of reality, then there's a lot of mysterious matter-energy out there that might influence reality in ways far greater than simply gravity.

My brief explanation, Ufology, of why I tend to agree with your statement, that "no one is communicating with the dead" is this: while I do think there is a transcendent aspect to every human which continues after bodily death, I do not think the dead are allowed to interact with the living, certainly not in a general way. If the meager events reported as ghosts of the dead are the real and actual spiritual continuation of people who've died decades or centuries earlier, then they evidently have entered into quite a fixed or retarded kind of life experience. That doesn't seem likely to me. I do think there is some kind of transcendent realm that humans can detect, and to me it is possible that "ghost haunting events" are something like "Rupert" dummy parachutists dropped the evening before D-Day to fool the Wehrmacht. IMHO, the "trickster" phenomenon would tend to support this speculation.
 
To all participants regarding abductions and the methods used. This is not an area I like to talk about and thus somewhat ignorant about, tbt I'm sort of hostile about it.

But isn't the abduction w/surgical overtones a realatively recent phenomenon. Why out of the blue would these guys...where ever they come from...would only in the past 30 years or so add this to their repertoire? Or why is it only recently people started reporting it. Being that visitation is thought to have been occurring for centuries If there was some kind of need to study any genetics or follow up on seeding or family lineage you would hear of accounts going back to then, not of sex with aliens ( very 50s/60s culturally wouldn't you agree?) but once we get to the harsher 70s and furthur on. it seems the surgical aspect was front and center when it should have been implemented aged ago. Seems unlikely some grey visitor had a brainstorm just 30+ years ago. "Hey let's get medieval on their ass".

It's almost like a meme got out and loose amongst us.

How and why did we get from soil samples to stool samples?

Are any of you guys familiar with any stories of missing fetus(s) going back before the 80s?


On the other hand if any of you guys haven't already done so, rent Dark City for some food for thought.
 
Last edited:
Hello "Sue" sunshine,
...
I actually think there are many woman who have a legitimate interest in the possible presence of aliens and other 'out of the norm' phenomena, they just may not have the leisure nor desire to pursue that interest when it may be more peripheral to the demands of their day to day lives. I hope your contribution will help Gene, Chris, and the other Paracasters and Paracastettes encourage more future participation by the ladies who are pursuing an interest in some aspect(s) of the various subjects The Paracast covers. Thank you.

Thank you for the kind words. I think your theory about female involvement is sound, especially about not having the leisure time to pursue a personal interest. As you say, a lot of responsibility for day-to-day life falls onto women's shoulders. As far as the desire to pursue such topics, I think that across genders it will always be the more liminal types who have the most drive for that. Although it could also be having Rh- blood. (jk).

There's also the possibility that talk about the paranormal is gendered in some way. That's when your gender shapes what topics you can talk about when and with whom or sometimes even what words and syntax you use. For example, there was a white slavery panic in the French town of Orleans in 1969 and some researchers went to study it. They were having a hard time finding out anything until they started hanging out at hairdresser's shops to listen as the women there chatted (book: Rumor in Orleans). There isn't a paranormal element to that story (well, okay, there were tunnels. And injections. And abductions...) but the rumor that swept the city became a very big deal. The point is until the researchers started getting their hair done they couldn't figure out what was driving it.

Another example might be something that's always struck me about Linda Moulton Howe -- she's mastered the kind of flat, just-the-facts reportorial vocal delivery that is practically synonymous with credibility and authority and is usually associated with a male person. It's almost like it doesn't matter what she actually says! (jk/~jk) Whereas someone like Ann Druffel who seems to have good research cred and who wrote a perfectly good book on how to resist alien abduction, gets largely ignored during the abduction-heavy 80s and 90s - what's up with that?

Finally, I would just like to say it's Paracastanettes, sir. We have them.
 
Back
Top