I didn't feel attacked. I was merely pointing out that instead of addressing the logic of my answer, which still stands, you shifted away from the matter at hand to, in essence, calling me ignorant about this topic. I readily admit to all sorts of ignorance. I could list gaps in my knowledge all day. However, having not commented on this particular vaccine, and with you not knowing anything about me personally, you logically aren't in a position to be making any statements about what I know or don't know about this issue.
So, you chose one causal event w/regard to SV40 while ignoring others, and then when this is pointed out you ignore the criticism and accuse the person making it of ignorance. These moves on your part constitute evidence to me that, for example, the documentary you recommend might be fraught with errors, but you might be missing them.