• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Command Sergeant Major James Norton Claims PROOF of UFOs!

Free episodes:

Its getting smelly by the day regarding this whole story!

Oh Boy your gonna love this;

skip to 5:50 talking about Disclosure with our current president
"i have a close friend that everywhere the president goes he goes with him. He's a marine."
and asked about a time frame
"in the near future"

wow, this adds quite a bit to this guys credibility.
 
KSS does use a disclamier which stipulate that its the guest views and everyone needs to make a living in paranormal genre which is another enterainment sector which sells books, dvds etc .
 
To keep something as large and as long as this phenomenon from the people is physically impossible. The govt. has enough trouble keeping stealth fighters a secret, let alone Area 54 and every other supposed secret they attempt to keep. Eventually, even covert intelligence is leaked out or talked about on some death bed or another

Quick frankly, what has happened in the last sixty years in ufology, does suggest some of the more powerful military and economic nations of the West, do know more about this very subject, then there willing to share now with the larger worldwide audience at this time. Now how much they know more then the average man or woman on the street, can't be dejuiced at this time, but during the 1952 UFO overflights Of Washington DC this subject got a fair amount of public awareness in the United States, especially, but the overarching problem with disclosing the UFO phenomenon, is that it does not conduct itself, or allow itself, to be controlled by humans on the ground.

An obvious problem, that would face any democratic-government in alerting their people to the UFO phenomenon, fundamentally may lay, and come down to one simple issue, there is nothing they've got that will prove this is nonhuman either, but that doesn't mean here however there is know tangible reality behind it all , it justs means maybe governments are just as confused and flabbergasted as everyone else to what is going on.

Actually lot of people across the world have never had an encounter with a UFO aren't necessarily in the dark to what is going on, and do accept the planet, may have been visited by intelligent creatures in the past and now. Anyway UFO's to me is an important subject, as they are prove perhaps of other life elsewhere coming to this planet, but I have accepted already, the impact of UFOs to how we live our lives is quiet minimal.

I do also hate the fact only a low number of people have seen this stuff for real, as its pointless sometimes me arguing with other people to prove UFO'S are real when you have not experienced such a thing, and I do have a life and, I don't need to make up stories to get your attention or anyone elses attention. I think people who claim they've seen this stuff any they know they haven't, does suggest there is some lacking of fulfillment in their daily lives at home and at work.

But I do accept the skeptical view. It would be hard to keep the secret of alien interactions from everyone on this planet, but like I said before ok, can the UFO phenomenon be considered a well kept secret?

Remember there is pages upon pages of files documenting civilian and military evidence eyewitness accounts and reports going back decades. Now if your thinking more along the lines of human back-engineered ships having been build based on the designs of recovered alien-craft, that were found somewhere, well yes keeping a tight hand on any of this information leaking out would be extremely difficult, but that reality has led to many altercations between people here on this forum and elsewhere, but its a reality that would be sensational if true, but it would be stupid and futile to claim it is going on, as this idea is in no short measure mixed in with the stories of crashed UFOs and Roswell..

Out of all people however who've claimed to have worked for the government doing this type of work only one person has me puzzled me that would be Bob Lazar. In my opinion this man is an employee of one of the United States intelligence agencies, or he worked indeed at Area51, as he claimed, for me this guy did not intentionally lie by himself. The evidence tells a different story.

My point is that in the situation where you find thousands upon thousands of sightings, supposed abductions, and every other supposedly "E.T." oriented phenomena, not one ever sees the physically evidential light of day. Then there is always the cover up, "but the proof is in the eyewitness....and in the radar....and in the landing zone", or something other than a physical alien finally reporting in....or some body found....or something we can really call "evidence" and use to prove that E.T. exists. We all know that there is something going on, but I am not ready to classify everything as E.T.....or really anything as that at this point.

Finally, remember the United States isn't the world, the impact of the UFO phenomenon has been felt across the world long before TV even existed. The UFO phenomenon, is just one of those things a mystery, but remember the UFO phenomenon has showed up multiple of times in different years and different months, but at the same spot, examples would be the Hudson Valley UFO sightings in the year 1982-83-84-86 and the Belgium Triangle UFO sightings in the year 1989-1990, fictitious hardly, these type of sightings are more important, as there not just single one day events like Roswell, Kecksburg, and even the Betty Hill Abductions and so on.

For me the Hudson Valley UFO Flap and the Belgium Triangle flap are premier UFO events more so then other cases for the fact that hundreds if not thousands of people saw these UFO's over a sustained period of time. So I must keep an open-mind this was ET as people did describe seeing something physical in nature. I personally think most of what is going would be beings coming into our world through window portal areas.
 
To me the only thing that could explain the silence, is there is something preventing the visitors from telling us there here, or we are dealing with an single origin phenomena. Like would humans if we had knowledge and know how hang about the skies of primitive alien world for centuries and not reveal ourselves to all the natives, I doubt it, the fact all visitors coming here allegedly are doing this, is what makes even more stranger for me.
Kieran, I think you are approaching this question of why 'not don't the aliens reveal themselves' from a very human-centric point of view. I think your viewpoint makes many implicit assumptions that are not necessarily valid.
The most obvious implicit assumption is that the 'E.T.' think like us or at least have similar goals/interests as us humans. Also, that they recognize us as some 'special' species on this planet worth 'revealing' themselves to. Who knows, maybe they're ignoring us and trying to communicate with our cows (by gently eviscerating and dissecting them:rolleyes:).
Maybe they could not care less about revealing themselves as you put it. What benefit would it be to them? Do you think they're really that eager to communicate with us so that we can share our vast cosmic knowledge with them? Finally, maybe they are revealing themselves to us in their own way but we're just not paying attention and are ignoring them. And have our governments do everything to deny their existence.
 
Kieran, I think you are approaching this question of why 'not don't the aliens reveal themselves' from a very human-centric point of view. I think your viewpoint makes many implicit assumptions that are not necessarily valid.
The most obvious implicit assumption is that the 'E.T.' think like us or at least have similar goals/interests as us humans. Also, that they recognize us as some 'special' species on this planet worth 'revealing' themselves to. Who knows, maybe they're ignoring us and trying to communicate with our cows (by gently eviscerating and dissecting them:rolleyes:).
Maybe they could not care less about revealing themselves as you put it. What benefit would it be to them? Do you think they're really that eager to communicate with us so that we can share our vast cosmic knowledge with them? Finally, maybe they are revealing themselves to us in their own way but we're just not paying attention and are ignoring them. And have our governments do everything to deny their existence.

I'm human so hardly suprising i would look at things from that standpoint. Actually I think the fact there coming here and maybe have taken and abducted some people suggests personality traits not that far removed from human personality. Take it just as an opinion of mine, not anyway me suggesting, this would be a confirmed fact. Also if cattle mutilations is being done by aliens say (don't know debatable) and aliens are indeed coming here, and they don't really care about live here, what they do is all part of the medical experiment, the aftermath is not relevant, Well again it seems from the stories we have human beings for the most part are been treated with lot more respect and care then other animals.

But you could be right in everything you just said., not saying your not right, but just remember just because aliens could be from another planet or universe, doesn't mean their following a different path to us or thinking differently.
 
But you could be right in everything you just said., not saying your not right, but just remember just because aliens could be from another planet or universe, doesn't mean their following a different path to us or thinking differently.
Kieran, it's not a question of being right or not. I think it is important to be careful and recognize the implicit assumptions we are making as humans when we try to analyse and make sense of this UFO situation. All of us making this attempt at understanding are human after all (though that in itself is an assumption:)) and come to the table mostly with deeply embedded human-centric viewpoints. In other words, I think we are looking at the situation through various filters placed upon us by our evolution and environment. It is important that we recognize as many of these filters as we can so that we can compensate for the filtering and see the situation clearly.
 
Kieran, it's not a question of being right or not. I think it is important to be careful and recognize the implicit assumptions we are making as humans when we try to analyse and make sense of this UFO situation. All of us making this attempt at understanding are human after all (though that in itself is an assumption:)) and come to the table mostly with deeply embedded human-centric viewpoints. In other words, I think we are looking at the situation through various filters placed upon us by our evolution and environment. It is important that we recognize as many of these filters as we can so that we can compensate for the filtering and see the situation clearly.

You know it's funny...I have been doing my very best to attain the exact statement you made here softbeard, but a lot of what I utilize in my posts are based on my personal religious beliefs, and sometimes it looks as though this gets in the way of a more "out of a box" response to people's posts.

I personally thank you for emphasizing how important it is to put away our human expectations and allow for a much clearer attempt at analysis.
 
Kieran, it's not a question of being right or not. I think it is important to be careful and recognize the implicit assumptions we are making as humans when we try to analyse and make sense of this UFO situation. All of us making this attempt at understanding are human after all (though that in itself is an assumption:)) and come to the table mostly with deeply embedded human-centric viewpoints. In other words, I think we are looking at the situation through various filters placed upon us by our evolution and environment. It is important that we recognize as many of these filters as we can so that we can compensate for the filtering and see the situation clearly.

This forum has new posts everyday from joined members, that often do analyse, and try to make sense of the UFO phenomenon. So, your overemphasizing my points in my opinion.

Anyways, I don't believe anyone can sincerely say they know what a nonhuman species, could be thinking, but there is in my opinion some clues in their actions towards our species, that enables me to least, try give an honest assessment on what could be happening!

I often do look and view UFO phenomenon, in ways I can understand, but that does not mean, i am been ignorant to other possibilities that may exist, but equally my point would be to you, what makes you so sure, an alien-nonhuman environment and setting and moral structure would be all different to what we have here?

The fact, that I outlined to you, that people are being returned home, after been taken onboard spacecraft-airships allegedly, and the majority of the abducted, have not received severe physical damage to their bodies. One could presume, and least, I can try to give an honest opinion on the information available to me, that these nonhuman abductors did handle with care and have returned human abductees safely back to their homes. That clue can not viewed to be human centric, as that is what has been alleged to be taking place in alien abduction mythology, for the last couple of generations at least, if this is not going on at'all, then you are close to being right yes 'RIGHT' then not with your opinions .

I don't buy into this filter crap analogy that people in this field spew. I have seen UFO's on three different occasions, different times, in different years. I also don't think the descriptions of the UFO's i gave, had anything to do with how I look at the world, pop culture influences and so on not withstanding.

Plus still haven't seen another description of UFO experience, like mine, anywhere ever, and the fact, unlike most people who've gone and claimed legitimate UFO sightings, my first sighting can be somewhat verified as having happened to me in Ireland.

I too later found out to my surprise, this UFO incident, was part of much later UFO event that happened, over one whole day. Whatever happened the UFO phenomenon, seems to have started up, or appeared in Ireland (during the day) my sighting was between the hours of 5pm and 7pm daytime of the month of March 30 1993 (i think it was after 6 not sure know been so long since that experience) Anyway's the UFO phenomenon seems to have progressed from the south to the north half of the UK during the night, and was seen, into the early hours of 31th march 1993 in France I believe also..

It became known as the Cosford UFO incident in the UK. I will not go into any much depth about my sighting, take too long, anyway I have previously posted two posts about it before when I joined the Paracast forums.

But I will post a video of the Cosford incident, and post a Dr David Clarke report about the Cosford incident,and paste some information about a numbers of UFO sightings at that time in Ireland.

One sighting was had by two Garda (policeman) on the 30th-31TH March 1993 in Askeaton, Limerick, not going to give my family's home address in limerick, but I will tell you i once lived only 7to 8 miles from that location in 1993, and I had my own experience of something different back then at that time. All of this will be off topic, but at the end of day, all we have is opinions, and my opinions often are based on what I have seen and experienced.

Here is the report from Ireland (it a bit long sorry) and the silly explanation given to explain all possible causes of what people were seeing in Ireland and the UK.

The night of March 30-31st, 1993, will remain long in the memory of many people in these islands. On that night, and, to a lesser extent, the following night, witnesses all over Ireland and Britain observed unusual, slow-moving lights in the sky. Without a doubt, many people had seen debris from a Russian satellite launch burn up high above the earth. Cosmos 2238 did indeed account for quite a number of sightings. Harder to understand, though, are the facts that the lights were seen heading in different directions at different times, and, more importantly, this space junk had the capability of somehow flying at very low altitude above electricity power lines. This fact was reported by two garda patrolmen who witnessed this spectacle from their squad car near Askeaton, Limerick. They observed a "large object in the sky with two lights, one at the front and the other at the back", which they first believed to be a Jumbo jet- except that it made no noise. Their sighting-and their being followed for some time by this thing-were officially logged by them soon afterwards back at their station.

Both Officers' names and ranks are known to us at IUFOPRA,and we will continue to withold them in the interests of their privacy. Though it is our policy, at all times, to protect the witnesses'identities from the public gaze, the Dublin-based 'Evening Herald' did print their names in February 1996 in a piece they ran on "The Irish X-Files". Other witnesses in Limerick City, reported their sightings in similiar terms, as "a silent craft like a Jumbo jet gliding over rooftops, that looked like it was about to touch electricity pylons". In the April-May 1993 edition of 'Astromony and Space', an article was published which set out to clear up the mystery once and for all. The incident involving the garda officers was related, and its time was (accurately) put at 01:13 on March the 31st. However, the explanation for the direction these lights moved in is at odds with witness statements. Dr. TS Kelso, Assistant Professor of Space Operations at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology, narrowed down the possibilities of what the object(s) may have been. From NORAD data he calculated that only 438 objects were above the (Irish) horizon at 00:10 UT on March 31st. Only one was below 250 km in altitude at this time. As this object had a perigee- the closest point that a celestial body comes to the earth-of just 107km, it was inevitable that it would fall earthwards.

This object was the carrier rocket body of Cosmos 2238, identified by Western military analysts as a spy satellite, despite Russian claims to the contrary, and launched from Baikonur Cosmosdrome on March 30th. It was expected to traverse Ireland between 01:06 and 01:12 local time, which fits in with many of the sightings, and in a northwest to southeast direction......... which very definitely does NOT fit in with some of them. One such sighting took place in Dunshaughlin, Co Meath, where a witness saw two lights flying close together and in silence. Both had a contrail behind them. They seemed to be very low in the sky but what was really odd was that they were going to the southWEST. This was at 01:15. Further discrepancies in their direction were observed in County Down, and also in England.
A criticism levelled at UFO reports has often been that ordinary civilians are not 'trained observers'. The fact that an ordinary person's eye witness testimony is quite acceptable in a criminal trial, but not in a UFO sighting account, speaks volumes about the failure of science and the mass media to think seriously, for even one moment, about UFOs being objectively real. This has been the case for countless years, but, hopefully, with the revelations that life of some sort may have existed-or may still exist-as close to us as Mars or Jupiter's moons, the same people who have spent years debunking UFOs, no matter what the weight of evidence says, will at least sit down and THINK. What sort of testimony, one wonders, IS acceptable? Who is a 'qualified' or 'trained' observer? Police and military personell, one would think.

We have already heard of the incident involving the patrol car in Limerick. The Irish Air Corps graciously replied promptly to our queries, and sent us copies of interesting statements from a Captain who was on board a Dauphin helicopter en route from Baldonnel (Casement) Aerodrome, near Dublin, to Finner Camp in Donegal. He and his crew of five observed a light being "turned on" above them in their two o'clock position. During their observation, which lasted about two minutes, by using night vision equipment they could see contrails behind what was now two lights. Dubllin ATC was consulted, but they radioed back that no other aircraft was nearby. Dublin checked with Shannon ATC,who also had no radar contacts in the area, apart from the Dauphin. They had been receiving similar reports from people in Askeaton and Bantry. An Iona Airways flight crossing the Welch coast overheard the conversation between the helicopter and Dublin ATC, and said they had seen a fast aircraft formation, moving from north to South at Fl 200, though this could have been RAF traffic. We also received a second military report which was even more interesting, in that the sighting had occurred on March 28th.Two "bright white lights" were observed over Newcastle, Co Dublin, which approxminately 200ft behind them, travelling at around 200kts; and with a dark trail behind each object. A diagram was supplied by the witness also. Copies of these statements and diagrams in our 1994 'Final Report;UFO Wave over England and Ireland-March 30/31st 1993' and is available to purchase by writing to our Box office for price etc. In compiling that report, it was frustrating that ANSO (the Air Navigation Services Office) stated in their reply to us-also reproduced in the report-that they had "no records or reports" of UFO sightings at Shannon ATC Centre for the dates in question.This is despite the fact that the military had reported his sighting to them, they had received reports there from members of the public in the Irish southwest, and they had told national newspapers that they had received these reports from the public.

Indeed, the 'Evening Press' of March 31st stated that the reports were being gathered at Shannon. It was quite understandable that the Irish Dept. of Defence fobbed off our query to them about military radar cover of the Republic and the possibility of 'Stealth' craft breaching national boundaries and security. However, having referred us to ANSO, then a part of Transport, Energy and Communications, we were disappointed that they in turn gave no information. This is despite ANSO being part of the Civil Service, funded by tax pounds. At least, though, we were successful in finding out about more sightings in Britain. Both PUFORG and DUFORO kindly forwarded details to us about sightings in England's south and Southwest, Wales, and, via a Ministry of Defence reply from Nick Pope at Air Staff 2A, also included in our report, further sightings in Yorkshire. In conclusion, despite the Cosmos 2238 explanation, other factors were undoubtedly involved. How else could space debris, travelling from NW to SE at, approximately, 01:15 or so,be seen heading due WEST at that time? Or due NORTH, off South Wales, a full hour earlier? Some speculation, certainly in Ireland, focused on a possible overflight of the American 'Aurora' spyplane, especially given the close proximity of RAF Macrihanish in Scotland. Even that, though, wouldn't explain the diversity in the times-and directions-of the sightings, especially over Wales and England.

It seems entirely possibly that something else was in the air that memorable night besides the Russian craft. Much has been said about controversial footage of 'UFOs' taken from the shuttle while in orbit. Less publicized has been the monitoring by unidentified craft of Russian space launches (as well as military manoeuvers). If UFOs do indeed exist, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume they would watch the workings-or malfunctions-of our leading edge technology, ie, our space programmes? This concludes the IUFOPRA STATUS REPORT on the UFO phenomenon in Ireland. In studying, researching and investigating the area of UFOs, things have a tendency to move quickly! At the time this report was concluded, the newspapers carried details of a UFO which was seen over Co Louth by amateur astronomers observing the Hale-Bopp comet, and the intriguing news that life may have existed, or even still exist, on Callisto and Ganymede. Ridicule would probably have greeted anyone who, even a couple of years ago, dared suggest life might exist as close to ourselves as the vicinity of Jupiter. So, it is commonplace to be overtaken by


The Cosford Incident |

http://youtu.be/LXt8vqcOh60
 
Throughout the entire report on the "Cosford" incident, some very interesting points I believe are relative to the thread here.

First of all, for the majority of sightings in this incident, contrails denoted an exhaust system unlike the many reports of propulsion used in "Extra-terrestrial" craft.

Secondly, this was obviously a "U.F.O." because even though there was clarification as to it being Russian, many eyewitnesses noted the opposite path it was taken, which would seriously contradict a satellite's progression.

Thirdly, the fact that it beamed lights down on a military vehicle denoted intelligence and this not being an anomalous or natural occurrence.

All this fits in nicely with the "U.F.O." phenomenon, but unless I am missing something here, the craft traveled rather slowly, never made an attempt to leave the atmosphere, at least in sight of any witnesses reporting from this piece, and the craft itself used lights and a spot light.....

I don't know...sounds to me like a terrestrial test vehicle of some sort, govt. perhaps or even privately developed.

One added note for the record here. I used to live in Upstate New York near to 684, an interstate highway which had alongside of it the many electrical power lines which flowed down to the City. These lines used to cause all sorts of strange anomalous situations, one of which both my wife and I were privy to, and it reminded me of something in this report.

One day we were driving home from Peekskill and as we entered the area around these huge power lines, my wife pointed out her window and screamed so loudly I thought I'd surely drive us into an accident. Finally getting my bearings and clearing out my right ear, I looked at what she was in shock over, and found the situation to be quite unnerving....There, literally floating in the air as if it was a picture captured in a giant frame in the sky, was a large green jet with no obvious letters or symbols on it whatsoever. It looked like we could reach out and touch it, and it was just hanging there, dead in the sky. As we moved further down the road from where it was positioned, we could see the ass of the thing just floating there, but it then seemed to be move very slowly away as we moved away from it.....

Strange but something I believe which was caused by the power lined girders....

Naturally explained yet very odd.
 
I often do look and view UFO phenomenon, in ways I can understand, but that does not mean, i am been ignorant to other possibilities that may exist, but equally my point would be to you, what makes you so sure, an alien-nonhuman environment and setting and moral structure would be all different to what we have here?
What I stated in my last post was meant to be general, not necessarily applying to yourself or your particular experience. However, what I stated in my previous original post, is more specific and does apply; ie. that you are indeed making implicit assumptions when you ask why 'don't the aliens reveal themselves'. Whether these assumptions are correct or not I cannot say, but it doesn't change the fact you are making them and they should be recognized first, then analyzed as to whether they are valid assumptions or not.
I have never said nor meant to imply that I was sure "an alien-nonhuman environment and setting and moral structure would be all different to what we have here". On the contrary, my personal belief is, from all accounts of ET's behaviour (assuming ET exisits), that they are behaving with moral principles that are similar, if not identical, to ours. The very fact we as humans are able to discern their 'moral' behaviour speaks for this. Furthermore, I can make some arguments based solely on logic as to why 'moral' behaviour should, in general, go hand-in-hand with intelligence.
I don't buy into this filter crap analogy that people in this field spew.
I did not realize other 'people in this field' were commonly making the same cautionary statements about making assumptions and our human-centric viewpoints. Well, all I can say is that I agree with them. In most cases, witnesses are viewing events through filters. This does not mean that the particular 'filters' the witness has significantly affect or color their account. But it may, so the filter should be identified and queried.
 
I don't know...sounds to me like a terrestrial test vehicle of some sort, govt. perhaps or even privately developed.

Just for clarity, let me explain the sighting I had, and maybe another, to see what explanation you have for it, just to see!!

Well i was aged 16 going on 17 in May at that time. Anyway that day 30th of March 1993.

Three male friends of mine decided, and asked me, do you want to camp out for the night, boredom at all nothing to do really.

I said ok. We'all gathered up some food from our parents house to eat later on ( my parents were giving out to me for taking more from the fridge that I should have lol) anyway each of us had our own sleeping bags to sleep in, did not need a tent, as it was a good, fine day very warm close to 2o plus celsius, so of we went to local football pitch, to stay the night at, it not that far from my home or my friend houses, the local pitch probably was less than a quarter of mile away from home.

When we arrived at the local soccer pitch, the grass was not long in length, and not that bumpy, which is aids having an undisturbed sleep, the pitch was been unused at that time for soccer matches, and it was open, for everyone to use anytime, to have a kick around, and was not been watched by security, or anyone.

I'm still not sure about what time I had this experience, but it was anywhere between 5pm and 7pm possibility 8pm in the evening, we all were just sitting around chatting as young males do, talking about all kinds of stuff (can't remember what though) when suddenly to the east of were i was sitting down.

I noticed the Sky (before that) It was cloudless day, with blue skies, but it did get darker around a hour after this experience, that is why I believe the experience, happened sometime after 6pm am 7pm or 8pm seems more probable because this happened at the end of the month of March at all.

The sky it hard to describe it with language, but the sky to east of me like, half it from my vantage point started to go through, a shock flashing type event, the sky was just pulsing rapidly, very quickly, it really difficult to explain, and it was nothing like thunder or lighting, seen that before.

The sky was just puzzling like this non stop for about 10 to 20 seconds, the blue was really bright blue because of this shocking effect, then suddenly, without warning three objects shaped like long school rulers, came from the east side, of were this was all going on, and kept on going to the west pass my line of sight.

The pace and speed of these objects was unbelievable, they got from one end to the other in less than three to four seconds. Two of the objects were of a bright green color and one was of a bright red color. Next a blue thing comes along, and it stops in flight close to center of this flashing, not exactly though. But what happens next is bizarre to me. It morphed from being just a blue long shaped object like a ruler, to now look like a ball, or an oval object.

It didn't hang about long. It just flew off towards the direction of the other objects that had just left. Slowly, but only took a few minutes, the sky began to return to normal again. To me what I saw can't be explained as being something made by humans, if its something environmental, well i haven't seen it since then, and how does something non intelligent have the ability to slow down and speed up again?

I have had a non family related Ghost Experience since then, but that is personal thing. The second UFO experience I had, would be too bizarre for some people to believe in. So not going to go into that.

My last UFO sighting happened during a return flight from Stansted airport London to Shannon airport Ireland. It was trip with a friend for business. It happened in 2009 Anyways to cut a long story short half way through my journey home, to my right were I was sitting, I was aboard a Ryanair plane flight.

My friend said to me with an amazed tone "What the hell is that?" Outside the plane window hovering and least hanging inside in the cloud bank, was three objects of a black/brown color that were shaped like mushrooms, or looked like an old industrial chimney whistler, that would call time on the end of the working day. Three of the objects were in one big cloud, and another two, were way of ahead in the distance in another cloud.

How objects 30,000 plus feet up could just sit there without moving is beyond me to this day, i could even see another plane, go underneath them, much far down down least another 5,000 feet i say.

There is nothing we have can do that i think? My Friend said there was orange color, but I couldn't see that, my friend was much closer to the window then I was though.

What I stated in my last post was meant to be general, not necessarily applying to yourself or your particular experience. However, what I stated in my previous original post, is more specific and does apply; ie. that you are indeed making implicit assumptions when you ask why 'don't the aliens reveal themselves'. Whether these assumptions are correct or not I cannot say, but it doesn't change the fact you are making them and they should be recognized first, then analyzed as to whether they are valid assumptions or not.
I have never said nor meant to imply that I was sure "an alien-nonhuman environment and setting and moral structure would be all different to what we have here". On the contrary, my personal belief is, from all accounts of ET's behaviour (assuming ET exisits), that they are behaving with moral principles that are similar, if not identical, to ours. The very fact we as humans are able to discern their 'moral' behaviour speaks for this. Furthermore, I can make some arguments based solely on logic as to why 'moral' behaviour should, in general, go hand-in-hand with intelligence

Softbeard. I'm only discussing stuff, that puzzles everyone.

Me assuming something, would be me believing this should happen, as we wouldn't do ever do the same thing, as these aliens are doing, and hang about, and keep this silent.

Look I don't presume to know the nonhuman mind, but exploring these questions, is what makes us human wrongly or rightly. I do recognize. I'm making lot of assumptions, but your almost asking me not to bring it up, for your benefit and satisfaction, like how would you go about analyzing, what I said to be wrong. For me, your asking the impossible at this time, but I'm willing to hear you out. The second half of your post. Your backing up my points during this thread discussion, hope you do realise that?

Your third point. That is much hard to know, but obviously somebody, who is lying probably will use things from the pop culture to describe an event, someone with a legitimate UFO experience, in my opinion, will describe how it was, not what they wanted it to be, maybe I am wrong though?
 
I believe that this was to you and those with you a U.F.O.

My only problem on this forum is that giant leap to it automatically being E.T., and E.T. mind you, who has had close ties with us for many thousands of years....who the govt. must have relations with, etc.

No.... to me what you have is a report of a U.F.O. and that is acceptable, but nothing more.
 
your almost asking me not to bring it up, for your benefit and satisfaction, like how would you go about analyzing, what I said to be wrong.
Kieran, I think you misunderstand me. I am not asking anything of you. As a witness, you present your description and that is that. I am simply pointing out the need to identify the assumptions being made. I think you are reading more into my statements than intended.
 
The whole business of conducting a live fire training exercise of a new weapons system in the presence of the Secretary of the Army does seem highly doubtful doesn't it? Wouldn't such things be done on a test range in the desert somewhere with him in a bunker rather than in an open field at Ft. Benning?

This guy says he has the goods, let's see what he delivers on.

I think it depends on the weapon system. If it were a live fire test of a small arms weapon then any miliary range would suffice. Benning is home to the Army Rangers and Special Forces (Green Berets) and hosts a bunch of training facilities. So, if the weapon was intended for infantry or special forces use this could be legit. Unfortunately, no real information on the weapons system was discussed.
 
I believe that this was to you and those with you a U.F.O.

My only problem on this forum is that giant leap to it automatically being E.T., and E.T. mind you, who has had close ties with us for many thousands of years....who the govt. must have relations with, etc.

No.... to me what you have is a report of a U.F.O. and that is acceptable, but nothing more.

Your frustration with the belief ET, is here already, confuses me, like you have know problem at'all believing there is interdimensional demonic beings, for real living in another area or location, outside of this world, but you find it hard, to even contemplate the possibility nonhuman's have arrived here from another planet, within our very own three dimensional construct!! Don't get it.

The arguing that you do against all the silly stuff within ufology, is fine by me, but in my opinion UFOs do exist, and you having already formed an unbreakable opinion, that all this is being produced by demonic entities, makes you just as bad as those diehard believers of the ET hypothesis, whom you have chosen to criticize so often here on this forum.

Honestly like surely you realise yourself your picking and choosing a certain UFO philosophy to suit your particular belief system? I think your smart enough to know that!!

You bringing up Govt, has a different meaning to some of us not living in your country, like I said to Train before, there is no major government spending in my country, to create aerial vehicles beyond what is currently seen and known about!!

Sorry, I don't buy into the theory I witnessed American owned air-space vehicles, or that if I looked closely enough, I might have seen an identifying marking that read "Made in the USA" Yes there just UFO's, look, I have no prove of anything else, were they've come from and such, but in my opinion as a witness.

The UFO's I saw were not build by humans hands, and this is not me picking a theory that suits me , what I seen was with my own eyes, not somebody else eyes, proved to me this stuff belonged, to some other intelligent race other then ourself's. You have no reason to believe me, all i will say is, I have no reason to lie to you, and i gain nothing by lying to you.
 
Honestly like surely you realise yourself your picking and choosing a certain UFO philosophy to suit your particular belief system? I think your smart enough to know that!!

Why is it that no matter how many times I continue to state for the record, that there is a big difference between my "belief" system and that of conclusively knowing what is happening with the phenomenon, that people continue to direct their personal defenses about E.T. against me like some holy crusade…..
Once again let me state for the record…..

I DON’T KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING OUT THERE IN EITHER OUTER SPACE OR INTER-DIMENSIONALLY, OR WITH MY OR WITH ANYONE ELSE’S GOVT!!!!!!

The facts which just aren’t here lead me to conclude via a “THEORY” that based on many years of personal research, my religion, and other bits and pieces of theoretical considerations, namely the odds of an E.T. versus something else happening, versus our size as a planet in the universe, versus what form of intelligence we are talking about when it comes to an alien body who can travel so far and do so and still care about us “ants”, versus the 50’s saucer scares and all the made up Gray looking creatures which all of a sudden became what everyone who is abducted has been privy too, etc. etc. etc. makes it all for a good science fiction novel, yet a poor explanation for what is actually happening, and this based on no evidence whatsoever.

But again…And here is where you need to concentrate in order for it all too finally sink in about me…I’m going to outline this part in REDDISH BROWN for emphasis:

I don’t know the answers and only have my personal theories. Others on this board KNOW the answers and will fight to their deaths to show how they and no one else is right….That E.T. is the only answer. I brought up the idea of Demonic activity because it fit in with my theory for a lack of any other viable reason, and this because I have waited years and years and years for a disclosure which has never happened….for definitive proof which has never happened. For anything….

Now lastly, and please finally let this sink in.


There is a GIANT difference between E.T. and a U.F.O. I believe what you witnessed that day was in fact an unidentified flying object….no more, no less. NONE of us have the evidence that it was extraterrestrial, inter-dimensional, from the center of the earth, or terrestrial. None of us know who is driving the craft, if anyone is driving, or if it’s a probe….or from the future, whatever.


So please understand the difference between my acknowledging the fact that what you experienced was indeed a U.F.O. to you, and that I refuse to believe it’s driven by any of the above until such time as we can be proven otherwise…


I respect the fact that you believe it is an E.T.

Please respect the belief that I think it could be anything including E.T.

And let’s finally move on.
 
Just for the record I never said what I saw was ET!!

I'm open to all possibilities the one option that i dismiss is the human one.
 
I agree, the next step is for a "credible UFO researcher" as he puts it to see the metal and report on it.
I understand he has spoken to Stan Friedman, has anyone spoken to him to hear what he has to say about the case ?
 
Back
Top