P
pixelsmith
Guest
so anything that has a perceived negative impact on the environment should be neutralized or just the human impact? to say we have surpassed natures ability to regulate humans is pretty arrogant.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I think its pretty clear our population is above earth's carrying capacity, we have simply surpassed nature's ability to regulate our growth....for the time being.
now i'm gonna kick al gore inna nuts.
this thread was made for me by Angelo. where is he anyway?godammit pixel, step away from the thread.
yay! my favorite sparring partner is alive and well. good to hear from you!I'm around. I've just been burnt out on the paranormal topics. I'm only really checking in a couple of times per week and if there are any moderation concerns that are brought to my attention.
I read both sides of the issues. As I recall this was your favorite "go to" site for your brand of "science". Could that be why you seem a bit sensitive to this post?Pixel, you like to talk about how the sources that talk about global warming as a problem are compromised, but don't you think linking to articles from a site associated with The Heartland Institute is also flawed? Or is it more of a "if they agree with my point of view they are cool" sort of thing.